AttriMIL: Revisiting attention-based multiple instance learning for whole-slide pathological image classification from a perspective of instance attributes
Open accessAbstract
Multiple instance learning (MIL) is a powerful approach for whole-slide pathological image (WSI) analysis, particularly suited for processing gigapixel-resolution images with slide-level labels. Recent attention-based MIL architectures have significantly advanced weakly supervised WSI classification, facilitating both clinical diagnosis and localization of disease-positive regions. However, these methods often face challenges in differentiating between instances, leading to tissue misidentification and a potential degradation in classification performance. To address these limitations, we propose AttriMIL, an attribute-aware multiple instance learning framework. By dissecting the computational flow of attention-based MIL models, we introduce a multi-branch attribute scoring mechanism that quantifies the pathological attributes of individual instances. Leveraging these quantified attributes, we further establish region-wise and slide-wise attribute constraints to dynamically model instance correlations both within and across slides during training. These constraints encourage the network to capture intrinsic spatial patterns and semantic similarities between image patches, thereby enhancing its ability to distinguish subtle tissue variations and sensitivity to challenging instances. To fully exploit the two constraints, we further develop a pathology adaptive learning technique to optimize pre-trained feature extractors, enabling the model to efficiently gather task-specific features. Extensive experiments on five public datasets demonstrate that AttriMIL consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods across various dimensions, including bag classification accuracy, generalization ability, and disease-positive region localization. The implementation code is available at https://github.com/MedCAI/AttriMIL.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hotspot detection approaches can reduce review time and improve safety but face challenges such as spurious attention to artifacts, sensitivity-specificity trade-offs in small-lesion detection, and overconfidence on out-of-distribution detection.
“These approaches can reduce review time and improve safety but face challenges such as spurious attention to artifacts, sensitivity-specificity trade-offs in small-lesion detection, and overconfidence on out-of-distribution detection [33,35,36].”
From Artificial Intelligence in Dermatopathology: An Update and Review of the Current Literature (2026) · cites this paper as [35]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 80 · Cited by 33
- Authors
- Cai, L., Huang, S., Zhang, Y., Lu, J., & Zhang, Y.
- Affiliations
- Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Ye
- Zhang, Yongbing
- Venue
- Medical Image Analysis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-07
- Volume
- 103
- Pages
- 103631
- ISSN
- 1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4410362102
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 6
- FWCI
- 13.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Medical Image Analysis (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Science and Technology Planning Project of Shenzhen Municipality (GXWD20220818170353009)
- Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Program
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62031023, 62331011)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- multiple instance learning, whole slide image classification, pathology image analysis, attribute constraints, weakly supervised classification
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Multiple-Instance Learning Algorithms, Algorithms, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review