The DOI matches its Crossref record; 207 of the 207 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Machine learning in clinical decision making
Open accessAbstract
Machine learning is increasingly integrated into clinical practice, with applications ranging from pre-clinical data processing, bedside diagnosis assistance, patient stratification, treatment decision making, and early warning as part of primary and secondary prevention. However, a multitude of technological, medical, and ethical considerations are critical in machine-learning utilization, including the necessity for careful validation of machine-learning-based technologies in real-life contexts, unbiased evaluation of benefits and risks, and avoidance of technological over-dependence and associated loss of clinical, ethical, and social-related decision-making capacities. Other challenges include the need for careful benchmarking and external validations, dissemination of end-user knowledge from computational experts to field users, and responsible code and data sharing, enabling transparent assessment of pipelines. In this review, we highlight key promises and achievements in integration of machine-learning platforms into clinical medicine while highlighting limitations, pitfalls, and challenges toward enhanced integration of learning systems into the medical realm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Microbiome analyses of blood and tissues suggest cancer diagnostic approach
Poore, G. D., Kopylova, E., Zhu, Q., Carpenter, C., Fraraccio, S., Wandro, S., Kosciolek, T., Janssen, S., Metcalf, J., Song, S. J., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2095-1 · Cited by 989
RetractedDeep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Bray, F., Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Siegel, R. L., Torre, L. A., & Jemal, A. (2018) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21492 · Cited by 84,109
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
McDonagh, T. A., Metra, M., Adamo, M., Gardner, R. S., Baumbach, A., Böhm, M., Burri, H., Butler, J., Čelutkienė, J., Chioncel, O., et al. (2021) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab670 · Cited by 19,442
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
Esteva, A., Kuprel, B., Novoa, R. A., Ko, J., Swetter, S. M., Blau, H. M., & Thrun, S. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21056 · Cited by 14,362
Advances in neural information processing systems 7
(1996) · Computers & Mathematics with Applications · doi:10.1016/s0898-1221(96)90463-0 · Cited by 14,281
2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure
Yancy, C. W., Jessup, M., Bozkurt, B., Butler, J., Casey, D. E., Drazner, M. H., Fonarow, G. C., Geraci, S. A., Horwich, T., Januzzi, J. L., et al. (2013) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.019 · Cited by 12,536
Cited by
Evaluation and mitigation of the limitations of large language models in clinical decision-making
Hager, P., Jungmann, F., Holland, R., Bhagat, K., Hubrecht, I., Knauer, M., Vielhauer, J., Makowski, M., Braren, R., Kaissis, G., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03097-1 · Cited by 798
Bias in medical AI: Implications for clinical decision-making
Cross, J. L., Choma, M. A., & Onofrey, J. A. (2024) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000651 · Cited by 607
Cullin, N., Azevedo Antunes, C., Straussman, R., Stein-Thoeringer, C. K., & Elinav, E. (2021) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2021.08.006 · Cited by 578
Self-citationWang, B., Li, Y., Zhou, M., Han, Y., Zhang, M., Gao, Z., Liu, Z., Chen, P., Du, W., Zhang, X., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36017-x · Cited by 259
Humans inherit artificial intelligence biases
Vicente, L., & Matute, H. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-42384-8 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Adlung, L., Cohen, Y., Mor, U., & Elinav, E.
- Venue
- Med
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-06
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 642-665
- ISSN
- 2666-6340 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3159875333
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 207
- FWCI
- 8.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine learning in clinical decision making. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.medj.2021.04.006
- The paper
- Adlung, L., Cohen, Y., Mor, U., & Elinav, E. (2021). Machine learning in clinical decision making. Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medj.2021.04.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
