Cited by 12Viral Infections and Outbreaks ResearchViral Infections and VectorsVirology and Viral Diseases

Distribution of Marburg virus in Africa: An evolutionary approach

Open access
Zehender, Gianguglielmo, Sorrentino, Chiara, Veo, Carla, Fiaschi, Lisa, Gioffrè, Sonia, Ebranati, Erika, Tanzi, Elisabetta, Ciccozzi, Massimo +2 more·2016·Infection, Genetics and Evolution

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the origin and geographical dispersion of Marburg virus, the first member of the Filoviridae family to be discovered. Seventy-three complete genome sequences of Marburg virus isolated from animals and humans were retrieved from public databases and analysed using a Bayesian phylogeographical framework. The phylogenetic tree of the Marburg virus data set showed two significant evolutionary lineages: Ravn virus (RAVV) and Marburg virus (MARV). MARV divided into two main clades; clade A included isolates from Uganda (five from the European epidemic in 1967), Kenya (1980) and Angola (from the epidemic of 2004-2005); clade B included most of the isolates obtained during the 1999-2000 epidemic in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and a group of Ugandan isolates obtained in 2007-2009. The estimated mean evolutionary rate of the whole genome was 3.3×10(-4) substitutions/site/year (credibility interval 2.0-4.8). The MARV strain had a mean root time of the most recent common ancestor of 177.9years ago (YA) (95% highest posterior density 87-284), thus indicating that it probably originated in the mid-XIX century, whereas the RAVV strain had a later origin dating back to a mean 33.8 YA. The most probable location of the MARV ancestor was Uganda (state posterior probability, spp=0.41), whereas that of the RAVV ancestor was Kenya (spp=0.71). There were significant migration rates from Uganda to the DRC (Bayes Factor, BF=42.0) and in the opposite direction (BF=5.7). Our data suggest that Uganda may have been the cradle of Marburg virus in Africa.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.meegid.2016.06.014

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zehender, G., Sorrentino, C., Veo, C., Fiaschi, L., Gioffrè, S., Ebranati, E., Tanzi, E., Ciccozzi, M., Lai, A., & Galli, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT)
Corresponding author
Zehender, Gianguglielmo
Venue
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
44
Pages
8-16
ISSN
1567-1348 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2413279130
Cited by
12
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Infection Genetics and Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Vectors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
Keywords
Marburg virus, filoviruses, phylogeography, viral origin, geographic dispersion, evolutionary rates, most recent common ancestor, Uganda, Democratic Republic of the Congo, viral migration
MeSH terms
Africa, Animals, Bayes Theorem, Biological Evolution, Humans, Marburg Virus Disease, Phylogeny, Selection, Genetic, Likelihood Functions, Marburgvirus, Gene Flow, Phylogeography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review