Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 423

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Reverse electrodialysis: Performance of a stack with 50 cells on the mixing of sea and river water

Open access
Veerman, J., Saakes, M., Metz, S.J., Harmsen, G.J.·2009·Journal of Membrane Science

Abstract

The purpose of reverse electrodialysis (RED) is to produce electricity upon the mixing of two solutions. We studied the power density (W/m2) and the energy efficiency (the amount of energy produced from specified volumes of river and sea water in relation to the thermodynamic maximum). With a stack of 50 cells (of 10 cm × 10 cm), a power density of 0.93 W/m2 was obtained with artificial river water (1 g NaCl/L) and artificial sea water (30 g NaCl/L), which is the highest practical value reported for RED. This value is achieved due to an optimized cell design using a systematic measurement protocol. The main factor in the power density is the cell resistance. With the used membranes (Fumasep FAD and FKD) and a spacer thickness of 200 μm, a cell resistance of 0.345 Ω is measured under RED conditions. This is about one and a half times the value as expected from the contribution of the individual components. This high value is probably caused by the shielding effect of the spacers. The largest contribution to this resistance (about 45%) is from the river water compartment. The hydrodynamic loss resulted in a maximal net power density of about 0.8 W/m2 at a flow rate of 400 mL/min. At this optimum the consumed power for pumping is 25% of the total generated energy. The majority of the pump power is lost in the manifolds. Multistage experiments were performed at maximal power conditions (a current density of about −30 A/m2 and at a flow rate of 300 mL/min). At these conditions the theoretical energy efficiency is maximal 50%. In practice however, the energy efficiency of a single stack is 9%. The effluent concentrations of the so operated stack are used for a second experiment and so on, simulating a multistage operation. With 3 stages a cumulative energy efficiency of 18% is achieved. A fourth stage did not increase this value. The power density of the 3 stages together was 50% of the power density of the first stage, indicating that energy efficiency and power density are counteracting. Further increase of power density and energy efficiency can be obtained with a better spacer and manifold design. A more open spacer is beneficial for RED in two ways: less shielding and lower pressure drop. Less shielding decreases the electrical resistance of the cell. A lower pressure drop permits the use of thinner water compartments, resulting again in a decreased electrical resistance of the cell and an improvement of the power density.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.11.015

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 423

Metadata

Authors
Veerman, J., Saakes, M., Metz, S. J., & Harmsen, G. J.
Venue
Journal of Membrane Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
327
Issue
1-2
Pages
136-144
ISSN
0376-7388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008683519
Cited by
423
References
0
FWCI
5.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reverse electrodialysis: Performance of a stack with 50 cells on the mixing of sea and river water. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.11.015
The paper
Veerman, J., Saakes, M., Metz, S. J., & Harmsen, G. J. (2009). Reverse electrodialysis: Performance of a stack with 50 cells on the mixing of sea and river water. Journal of Membrane Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.11.015

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.