Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 210

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mixed polyamide-based composite nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes with improved low-pressure water softening capability

Fang, Wangxi, Shi, Lei, Wang, Rong·2014·Journal of Membrane Science

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.05.047

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Gabrielli, 2006, Electrochemical water softening: principle and application, Desalination, 201, 150, 10.1016/j.desal.2006.02.012 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Conlon, 1990, Membrane softening – the concept and its application to municipal water-supply, Desalination, 78, 157, 10.1016/0011-9164(90)80040-I · DOI
  3. Comstock, 1989, Desal-5 membrane for water softening, Desalination, 76, 61, 10.1016/0011-9164(89)87039-0 · doi:10.1016/0011-9164(89)87039-0
  4. Duran, 1995, A comparison of membrane softening on three South Florida groundwaters, Desalination, 102, 27, 10.1016/0011-9164(95)00038-4 · doi:10.1016/0011-9164(95)00038-4
  5. Song, 2011, Performance of UF–NF integrated membrane process for seawater softening, Desalination, 276, 109, 10.1016/j.desal.2011.03.064 · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2011.03.064
  6. Su, 2012, Study on seawater nanofiltration softening technology for offshore oilfield water and polymer flooding, Desalination, 297, 30, 10.1016/j.desal.2012.04.014 · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2012.04.014
  7. Van der Bruggen, 2003, Reuse, treatment, and discharge of the concentrate of pressure-driven membrane processes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 3733, 10.1021/es0201754 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Petersen, 1993, Composite reverse-osmosis and nanofiltration membranes, J. Membr. Sci., 83, 81, 10.1016/0376-7388(93)80014-O · DOI · Paper page
  9. Verissimo, 2006, Influence of the diamine structure on the nanofiltration performance, surface morphology and surface charge of the composite polyamide membranes, J. Membr. Sci., 279, 266, 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.12.014 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2005.12.014
  10. Yu, 2009, Aromatic–cycloaliphatic polyamide thin-film composite membrane with improved chlorine resistance prepared from m-phenylenediamine-4-methyl and cyclohexane-1,3,5-tricarbonyl chloride, J. Membr. Sci., 344, 155, 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.07.046 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2009.07.046
  11. Wang, 2010, Polyamide thin-film composite membranes prepared from a novel triamine 3,5-diamino-N-(4-aminophenyl)-benzamide monomer and m-phenylenediamine, J. Membr. Sci., 353, 78, 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.02.033 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2010.02.033
  12. Pandey, 2001, Formation of pore-filled ion-exchange membranes with in situ crosslinking: poly(vinylbenzyl ammonium salt)-filled membranes, J. Polym. Sci. Part A: Polym. Chem., 39, 807, 10.1002/1099-0518(20010315)39:6<807::AID-POLA1054>3.0.CO;2-2 · doi:10.1002/1099-0518(20010315)39:6<807::aid-pola1054>3.0.co;2-2
  13. Li, 2009, Preparation and characterization of poly(piperazineamide) composite nanofiltration membrane by interfacial polymerization of 3,3′,5,5′-biphenyl tetraacyl chloride and piperazine, J. Membr. Sci., 335, 133, 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.03.011 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2009.03.011
  14. Tang, 2008, Study on a novel polyester composite nanofiltration membrane by interfacial polymerization of triethanolamine (TEOA) and trimesoyl chloride (TMC) I. Preparation, characterization and nanofiltration properties test of membrane, J. Membr. Sci., 320, 198, 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.002 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.002
  15. Huang, 2006, Studies on nanofiltration membrane formed by diisocyanate cross-linking of quaternized chitosan on poly (acrylonitrile)(PAN) support, J. Membr. Sci., 286, 237, 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.09.045 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2006.09.045
  16. Chiang, 2009, Nanofiltration membranes synthesized from hyperbranched polyethyleneimine, J. Membr. Sci., 326, 19, 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.09.021 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2008.09.021
  17. Li, 2006, A novel nanofiltration membrane prepared with PAMAM and TMC by in situ interfacial polymerization on PEK-C ultrafiltration membrane, J. Membr. Sci., 269, 84, 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.06.021 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2005.06.021
  18. Yu, 2011, Study on polyamide thin-film composite nanofiltration membrane by interfacial polymerization of polyvinylamine (PVAm) and isophthaloyl chloride (IPC), J. Membr. Sci., 379, 164, 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.05.061 · DOI
  19. Yaroshchuk, 2001, Non-steric mechanisms of nanofiltration: superposition of Donnan and dielectric exclusion, Sep. Purif. Technol., 22, 143, 10.1016/S1383-5866(00)00159-3 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Fang, 2013, Interfacially polymerized composite nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes for low-pressure water softening, J. Membr. Sci., 430, 129, 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.12.011 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Loh, 2011, Fabrication of high performance polyethersulfone UF hollow fiber membranes using amphiphilic Pluronic block copolymers as pore-forming additives, J. Membr. Sci., 380, 114, 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.06.041 · DOI
  22. Fang, 2012, Composite forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes: Integration of RO- and NF-like selective layers to enhance membrane properties of anti-scaling and anti-internal concentration polarization, J. Membr. Sci., 394, 140, 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.034 · DOI
  23. Wang, 2010, Characterization of novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes, J. Membr. Sci., 355, 158, 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.03.017 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2010.03.017
  24. Shi, 2011, Effect of substrate structure on the performance of thin-film composite forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes, J. Membr. Sci., 382, 116, 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.07.045 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2011.07.045
  25. Hirose, 1996, Effect of skin layer surface structures on the flux behaviour of RO membranes, J. Membr. Sci., 121, 209, 10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00181-0 · doi:10.1016/s0376-7388(96)00181-0
  26. Yoon, 2009, High flux nanofiltration membranes based on interfacially polymerized polyamide barrier layer on polyacrylonitrile nanofibrous scaffolds, J. Membr. Sci., 326, 484, 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.10.023 · DOI
  27. Ahmad, 2004, Composite nanofiltration polyamide membrane: a study on the diamine ratio and its performance evaluation, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 43, 8074, 10.1021/ie0497994 · doi:10.1021/ie0497994
  28. Saha, 2009, Performance evaluation of thin film composite polyamide nanofiltration membrane with variation in monomer type, J. Membr. Sci., 342, 60, 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.06.025 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2009.06.025
  29. Verissimo, 2005, New composite hollow fiber membrane for nanofiltration, Desalination, 184, 1, 10.1016/j.desal.2005.03.069 · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2005.03.069
  30. Yang, 2007, Preparation and characterization of polypiperazine amide/PPESK hollow fiber composite nanofiltration membrane, J. Membr. Sci., 301, 85, 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.06.009 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2007.06.009
  31. Ghosh, 2008, Impacts of reaction and curing conditions on polyamide composite reverse osmosis membrane properties, J. Membr. Sci., 311, 34, 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.11.038 · DOI
  32. Bowen, 1998, Characterization and prediction of nanofiltration membrane performance – a general assessment, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 76, 885, 10.1205/026387698525685 · DOI
  33. Bowen, 1997, Characterisation of nanofiltration membranes for predictive purposes – use of salts, uncharged solutes and atomic force microscopy, J. Membr. Sci., 126, 91, 10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00276-1 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Schaep, 1998, Influence of ion size and charge in nanofiltration, Sep. Purif. Technol., 14, 155, 10.1016/S1383-5866(98)00070-7 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Nghiem, 2007, Effects of membrane fouling on the nanofiltration of pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs): mechanisms and role of membrane pore size, Sep. Purif. Technol., 57, 176, 10.1016/j.seppur.2007.04.002 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Liu, 2008, Study on the thin-film composite nanofiltration membrane for the removal of sulfate from concentrated salt aqueous: preparation and performance, J. Membr. Sci., 310, 289, 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.11.002 · DOI
  37. Park, 2010, Ion transport characteristics in nanofiltration membranes: measurements and mechanisms, Aqua, 59, 179
  38. Zazouli, 2010, Effect of hydrophilic and hydrophobic organic matter on amoxicillin and cephalexin residuals rejection from water by nanofiltration, Iran. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng., 7
  39. Garcia-Aleman, 2004, Permeation of mixed-salt solutions with commercial and pore-filled nanofiltration membranes: membrane charge inversion phenomena, J. Membr. Sci., 239, 163, 10.1016/j.memsci.2004.02.036 · DOI
  40. Mohamed, 2005, Impact of land disposal of reject brine from desalination plants on soil and groundwater, Desalination, 182, 411, 10.1016/j.desal.2005.02.035 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Elazhar, 2013, Comparison of the performances of two commercial membranes in hardness removal from underground water using Nanofiltration membranes, Int. J. Adv. Chem., 1, 21

Cited by

See all 210

Metadata

Authors
Fang, W., Shi, L., & Wang, R.
Venue
Journal of Membrane Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
468
Pages
52-61
ISSN
0376-7388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074762644
Cited by
210
References
0
FWCI
10.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation-Prime Minister׳s office, Republic of Singapore
  • Environment & Water Industry Programme Office (EWI) of PUB (MEWR C651/06/182, 0901-IRIS-20)
  • Economic Development Board - Singapore

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mixed polyamide-based composite nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes with improved low-pressure water softening capability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.05.047
The paper
Fang, W., Shi, L., & Wang, R. (2014). Mixed polyamide-based composite nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes with improved low-pressure water softening capability. Journal of Membrane Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.05.047

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.