Urinary GC-MS steroid metabotyping in treated children with congenital adrenal hyperplasia
Abstract
Background Treatment of children with classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) is a difficult balance between hypercortisolism and hyperandrogenism. Biochemical monitoring of treatment is not well defined.Objective Cluster analysis of the urinary steroid metabolome obtained by targeted gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) for treatment monitoring of children with CAH.Methods We evaluated 24-h urinary steroid metabolome analyses of 109 prepubertal children aged 7.0 ± 1.6 years with classic CAH due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency treated with hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone. 24-h urinary steroid metabolite excretions were transformed into CAH-specific z-scores. Subjects were divided into groups (metabotypes) by k-means clustering algorithm. Urinary steroid metabolome and clinical data of patients of each metabotype were analyzed.Results Four unique metabotypes were generated. Metabotype 1 (N = 21 (19%)) revealed adequate metabolic control with low cortisol metabolites (mean: -0.57z) and suppressed androgen and 17α-hydroxyprogesterone (17OHP) metabolites (-0.79z). Metabotype 2 (N = 23 (21%)) showed overtreatment consisting of a constellation of elevated urinary cortisol metabolites (0.62z) and low metabolites of androgens and 17OHP (-0.75z). Metabotype 3 (N = 32 (29%)) demonstrated undertreated patients with low cortisol metabolites (-0.69z) and elevated metabolites of androgens and 17OHP (0.50z). Metabotype 4 (N = 33 (30%)) presented patients with treatment failure reflected by unsuppressed androgen- and 17OHP metabolites (0.71z) despite elevated urinary cortisol metabolites (0.39z).Conclusion Metabotyping, which means grouping metabolically similar individuals, helps to monitor treatment of children with CAH using GC-MS urinary steroid metabolome analysis. This method allows classification in adequately-, over-, or undertreated children as well as identification of patients with treatment failure.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LC-MS is a more recent technique than GC-MS.
“LC-MS is a more recent technique than GC-MS (303).”
From Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia—Current Insights in Pathophysiology, Diagnostics, and Management (2022) · cites this paper as [303]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 28
- Authors
- Kamrath, C., Hartmann, M. F., Pons-Kühnemann, J., & Wudy, S. A.
- Affiliations
- Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Wudy, Stefan A.
- Venue
- Metabolism
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 112
- Pages
- 154354
- ISSN
- 0026-0495 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3084294768
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 1.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
- Keywords
- congenital adrenal hyperplasia, 21-hydroxylase deficiency, treatment monitoring, cortisol, fludrocortisone, cortisol metabolites, androgen metabolites, 17-hydroxyprogesterone, overtreatment, undertreatment, treatment failure, children
- MeSH terms
- Adrenal Hyperplasia, Congenital, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Fludrocortisone, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Retrospective Studies, Metabolome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review