The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Joint displays for mixed methods research in psychology
Open accessAbstract
Mixed methods researchers use joint displays for integration at different phases of the research process in psychological research. Joint displays are visual displays that are used to integrate quantitative and qualitative data during data collection, analysis, and interpretation. We discuss different mixing purposes and how joint displays may help researchers integrate the quantitative and qualitative strands of a study. We provide examples of joint displays for data collection and for data analysis, including newer innovations. Finally, we discuss considerations, including benefits and challenges, of using joint displays during data collection and analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Integration of results is considered a defining feature of mixed-methods research.41”
From Mixed-methods feasibility outcomes for a novel ACT-based video game ‘ACTing Minds’ to support mental health (2024) · cites this paper as [41]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research
Robinson, P. M. (2007) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00096.x · Cited by 23,362
Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices
Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12117 · Cited by 7,219 · cited 2×
“We discuss the different forms of integration served by joint displays for methods and analyses (Fetters et al., 2013), how the examples provided serve mixing purposes (Greene et al., 1989), and identify innovative forms of joint displays in psychological research.”
BackgroundToward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/01623737011003255 · Cited by 5,687
Using Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Design: From Theory to Practice
Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006) · Field Methods · doi:10.1177/1525822x05282260 · Cited by 3,167
Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry
Greene, J. C. (2007) · Cited by 1,960
Guetterman, T. C., Fetters, M. D., & Creswell, J. W. (2015) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.1865 · Cited by 1,740
Editorial: The New Era of Mixed Methods
Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W. (2007) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/2345678906293042 · Cited by 1,204
An Introduction to Fully Integrated Mixed Methods Research
Creamer, E. G. (2018) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781071802823 · Cited by 469
Integrating Analyses in Mixed Methods Research
Bazeley, P. (2018) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781526417190 · Cited by 397
Methodological Rigor in Mixed Methods: An Application in Management Studies
Harrison, R. L., Reilly, T. M., & Creswell, J. W. (2020) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/1558689819900585 · Cited by 353
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- DeCuir-Gunby, 2017, vol. 5
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gillespie, A., Glăveanu, V. P., & Laurent, C. D. S. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009031066 · Cited by 120
Younas, A., & Durante, Á. (2022) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.15536 · Cited by 72
Cogan, N. A., Kennedy, C., Beck, Z., McInnes, L., MacIntyre, G., Morton, L., Tanner, G., & Kołacz, J. (2022) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1111/hsc.13992 · Cited by 57
Associations between climate change-related factors and sexual health: A scoping review
Logie, C. H., Toccalino, D., MacKenzie, F., Hasham, A., Narasimhan, M., Donkers, H., Lorimer, N., & Malama, K. (2024) · Global Public Health · doi:10.1080/17441692.2023.2299718 · Cited by 50
A software feature for mixed methods analysis: The MAXQDA Interactive Quote Matrix
Guetterman, T. C., & James, T. G. (2023) · Methods in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.metip.2023.100116 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- McCrudden, M. T., Marchand, G., & Schutz, P. A.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
- University of Arizona (US)
- Corresponding author
- McCrudden, Matthew T.
- Venue
- Methods in Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-12
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 100067
- ISSN
- 2590-2601 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3184843358
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 17
- FWCI
- 32.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Methods in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Digital Scholarship - UNLV (University of Nevada Reno) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Data Visualization and Analytics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Keywords
- joint displays, mixed methods, qualitative-quantitative integration, data visualization, data collection, data analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
