Cited by 40Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionSmart Agriculture and AI

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Real-time tool detection in smart manufacturing using You-Only-Look-Once (YOLO)v5

Open access
Zendehdel, Niloofar, Chen, Haodong, Leu, Ming C.·2023·Manufacturing Letters

Abstract

Computer vision plays an essential role in Industry 4.0 by enabling machinery to perceive, analyze, and control production processes. Object detection, a computer vision technique that accurately classifies and localizes objects within images, has gained significant interest. This technique can be applied in various domains, including manufacturing, to assist in the detection of different tools. In this paper, You-Only-Look-Once (YOLO)v5 real-time object detection technique has been developed and optimized, to detect different tool types and their locations in a manufacturing setting. To train the neural network, a dataset of 3,286 tool images from the internet has been collected and annotated. To enhance the model's ability in generalization, three augmented variants of each image have been created to improve rotation invariance. The model's training scheme has been further optimized with stochastic gradient descent after configuring different hyperparameters such as learning rate and momentum. The fine-tuned model achieved a mean average accuracy of 98.3 %, demonstrating the high precision of the model in detecting different tool types and their locations in real-time.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mfglet.2023.08.062

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Fernández-Caramés, 2019, Towards an autonomous industry 4.0 warehouse: a UAV and blockchain-based system for inventory and traceability applications in big data-driven supply chain management, Sensors, 19, 10.3390/s19102394 · DOI
  2. Zaidi, 2022, A survey of modern deep learning based object detection models, Digit Signal Process, 10.1016/j.dsp.2022.103514 · DOI
  3. Jiao, 2019, A survey of deep learning-based object detection, IEEE Access, 7, 128837, 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939201 · DOI
  4. Girshick, 2015, Region-based convolutional networks for accurate object detection and segmentation, IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 38, 142, 10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2437384 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Redmon J, Farhadi A. YOLO9000: better, faster, stronger. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition; 2017. p. 7263–71. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Redmon J, Farhadi A. Yolov3: an incremental improvement, arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.02767; 2018. · arXiv
  7. Bochkovskiy A, Wang C-Y, Liao H-YM. Yolov4: optimal speed and accuracy of object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.10934; 2020. · arXiv
  8. Yu, 2021, Real-time underwater maritime object detection in side-scan sonar images based on transformer-YOLOv5, Remote Sens (Basel), 13, 3555, 10.3390/rs13183555 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Jing, 2022, Automatic extraction of damaged houses by earthquake based on improved YOLOv5: a case study in Yangbi, Remote Sens (Basel), 14
  10. Zhao, 2021, A wheat spike detection method in UAV images based on improved YOLOv5, Remote Sens (Basel), 13
  11. Yao, 2021, A real-time detection algorithm for kiwifruit defects based on YOLOv5, Electronics (Basel), 10
  12. Jung, 2022, Improved YOLOv5: efficient object detection using drone images under various conditions, Appl Sci, 12, 10.3390/app12147255 · DOI
  13. Fang, 2021, Accurate and automated detection of surface knots on sawn timbers using YOLO-V5 model, Bioresources, 16, 10.15376/biores.16.3.5390-5406 · DOI
  14. Lei F, Tang F, Li S. Underwater target detection algorithm based on improved YOLOv5. J Mar Sci Eng 2022;10(3). doi: 10.3390/jmse10030310. · DOI
  15. Padilla R, Netto SL, da Silva EAB. A survey on performance metrics for object-detection algorithms. In: 2020 international conference on systems, signals and image processing (IWSSIP); 2020. p. 237–42. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Zendehdel, N., Chen, H., & Leu, M. C.
Affiliations
Missouri University of Science and Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Zendehdel, Niloofar
Venue
Manufacturing Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-08
Volume
35
Pages
1052-1059
ISSN
2213-8463 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387455278
Cited by
40
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 1
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Manufacturing Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Missouri University of Science and Technology
  • National Science Foundation (CMMI-1954548)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
Keywords
tool detection, real-time object detection, YOLOv5, smart manufacturing, Industry 4.0, data augmentation, fine-tuning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review