Cited by 402Fungal and yeast genetics researchEffects of Radiation ExposureMicrobial Metabolism and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 14 of the 67 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Ionizing radiation: how fungi cope, adapt, and exploit with the help of melanin

Open access
Dadachova, Ekaterina, Casadevall, Arturo·2008·Current Opinion in Microbiology

Abstract

Life on Earth has always existed in the flux of ionizing radiation. However, fungi seem to interact with the ionizing radiation differently from other inhabitants of the Earth. Recent data show that melanized fungal species like those from Chernobyl's reactor respond to ionizing radiation with enhanced growth. Fungi colonize space stations and adapt morphologically to extreme conditions. Radiation exposure causes upregulation of many key genes, and an inducible microhomology-mediated recombination pathway could be a potential mechanism of adaptive evolution in eukaryotes. The discovery of melanized organisms in high radiation environments, the space stations, Antarctic mountains, and in the reactor cooling water combined with phenomenon of 'radiotropism' raises the tantalizing possibility that melanins have functions analogous to other energy harvesting pigments such as chlorophylls.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review argues that melanized fungi can not only survive ionizing radiation but in some cases respond to it with directed growth or faster growth, possibly through melanin-mediated energy transduction and radioprotection. It synthesizes environmental, space, and laboratory evidence and proposes mechanisms while noting methodological caveats in some radiotropism studies.

Key findings

  • Melanized fungi occupy extreme radiation environments, including Chernobyl reactor surfaces and cooling water, Antarctic/Arctic sites, and spacecraft. In Israel’s “Evolution Canyon,” the south-facing slope receives 200–800% more solar radiation, and *Aspergillus niger* there contains three times more melanin; isolates from that slope grew faster after exposure to up to 4,000 Gy of ⁶⁰Co radiation than north-slope isolates.
  • Chernobyl-associated fungi showed “radiotropism”: across 27 fungus–radiation interactions, 18 (66.7%) displayed positive growth toward the radiation source, with significant directed growth to a ¹⁰⁹Cd source for several isolates. Later work reported radiation-promoted spore germination, or “radiostimulation,” and a “radioadaptive response” only for fungi from contaminated regions, though the authors note possible technical limitations.
  • Irradiation changed melanin’s electron spin resonance signal, and irradiated melanin showed a fourfold greater capacity to reduce NADH. Melanized *Cryptococcus neoformans*, *Wangiella dermatitidis*, and *Cladosporium sphaerospermum* showed increased metabolic activity or growth after radiation about 500 times background, including threefold greater ¹⁴C-acetate incorporation; melanin’s protective effects were attributed to free-radical quenching and its spherical arrangement.
  • Yeast studies linked radiation responses to cell-cycle, DNA-processing, repair, recombination, and stress genes. A microhomology-mediated recombination pathway induced by 50 Gy gamma-rays in *Saccharomyces cerevisiae* was proposed as a possible route to adaptive evolution, but the authors consider it unlikely to explain rapid growth effects in irradiated melanized fungi.

Methods

  • Narrative review synthesizing published studies on fungi in high-radiation environments, spacecraft, melanin–radiation interactions, and genetic responses to radiation; no new primary experiments are reported.
  • Evidence discussed includes Chernobyl isolates, ⁶⁰Co exposures up to 4,000 Gy, collimated ³²P and ¹⁰⁹Cd beams, ¹²¹Sn and ¹³⁷Cs sources, International Space Station surveys, a 7-month open-space exposure, melanin ESR/HPLC assays, XTT/MTT metabolic assays, CFU/dry-weight/¹⁴C-acetate measurements, and yeast microarray and recombination studies.
  • Main analysis is qualitative synthesis and hypothesis generation rather than systematic review or meta-analysis.

Limitations

  • Stated by the authors: later radiotropism/radiostimulation studies used radioactive sources roughly 1,000-fold less active than earlier work, possibly too weak to stimulate hyphal growth; low-energy ¹²¹Sn and ¹³⁷Cs beta particles may have been absorbed by the Petri dish, meaning actual doses could have been overestimated.
  • Evident from the text: as a review, it lacks a systematic search strategy, formal quality appraisal, or meta-analysis, and many conclusions depend on cited studies with varied organisms, radiation sources, and endpoints.
  • Evident from the text: the proposal that melanin acts like an energy-harvesting pigment analogous to chlorophyll is explicitly speculative and requires future experimental testing.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mib.2008.09.013

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

14 of 67 cited sources checked · 11 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 26 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 5
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 17
21 of 21

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 42 references

4 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Zhdanova, 1994, Tropism of soil micromycetes under the influence of ionizing radiation, Mycologiya i Fitopatologiya, 28, 8

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–402 of 402

Metadata

Authors
Dadachova, E., & Casadevall, A.
Affiliations
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
  • Dadachova, Ekaterina
  • Casadevall, Arturo
Venue
Current Opinion in Microbiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-12
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
525-531
ISSN
1369-5274 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018461548
Cited by
399
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ai052733-16, 5r37ai033142-24)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI-033774, R01AI033142, R37-AI033142, AI60507, AI033142, R01-AI052733, R56AI060507, R01AI060507, R01AI033774)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Metabolism and Applications
Keywords
ionizing radiation, fungi, melanin, radiation adaptation, microhomology-mediated recombination, adaptive evolution, gene upregulation
MeSH terms
Fungi, Melanins, Radiation, Ionizing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review