Interaction of pathogenic yeasts with phagocytes: survival, persistence and escape.
Abstract
Pathogenic yeasts, either from the environment or the normal flora, have to face phagocytic cells that constitute the first line of defence during infection. In order to evade or counteract attack by phagocytes, pathogenic yeasts have acquired a repertoire of strategies to survive, colonize and infect the host. In this review we focus on the interaction of yeasts, such as Candida, Histoplasma or Cryptococcus species, with macrophages or neutrophils. We discuss strategies used by these fungi to prevent phagocytosis or to counteract phagocytic activities. We go on to describe the strategies that permit intracellular survival within phagocytes and that may eventually lead to damage of and escape from the phagocyte.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
C. glabrata cells resist killing by macrophages and have evolved distinct strategies for intracellular survival.
“Of note, C. glabrata cells also resist killing by macrophages and have evolved distinct strategies for intracellular survival (Otto and Howard, 1976; Kaur et al., 2007; Seider et al., 2010).”
From Candida glabrata susceptibility to antifungals and phagocytosis is modulated by acetate (2015) · cites this paper as Seider et al., 2010
Fps1, a homologue of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae acetate channel, is also upregulated inside macrophages.
“Another observation supporting this hypothesis is that Fps1, a homologue of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae acetate channel, is also upregulated inside macrophages (Seider et al., 2010).”
From Candida glabrata susceptibility to antifungals and phagocytosis is modulated by acetate (2015) · cites this paper as Seider et al., 2010
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 77 · Cited by 167
- Authors
- Seider, K., Heyken, A., Lüttich, A., Miramón, P., & Hube, B.
- Affiliations
- Leibniz-Institut für Naturstoff-Forschung und Infektionsbiologie e. V. - Hans-Knöll-Institut (HKI) (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Hube, Bernhard
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Microbiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 392-400
- ISSN
- 1369-5274 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035155416
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 1.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Keywords
- pathogenic yeasts, phagocytes, phagocytosis evasion, macrophages, neutrophils, intracellular survival, Candida, Histoplasma, Cryptococcus, fungal persistence, host-pathogen interaction
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Macrophages, Mycoses, Neutrophils, Phagocytes, Phagocytosis, Yeasts, Host-Pathogen Interactions, Immune Evasion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review