Cited by 167Fungal Infections and StudiesAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal and yeast genetics research

Interaction of pathogenic yeasts with phagocytes: survival, persistence and escape.

Seider, Katja, Heyken, Antje, Lüttich, Anja, Miramón, Pedro, Hube, Bernhard·2010·Current Opinion in Microbiology

Abstract

Pathogenic yeasts, either from the environment or the normal flora, have to face phagocytic cells that constitute the first line of defence during infection. In order to evade or counteract attack by phagocytes, pathogenic yeasts have acquired a repertoire of strategies to survive, colonize and infect the host. In this review we focus on the interaction of yeasts, such as Candida, Histoplasma or Cryptococcus species, with macrophages or neutrophils. We discuss strategies used by these fungi to prevent phagocytosis or to counteract phagocytic activities. We go on to describe the strategies that permit intracellular survival within phagocytes and that may eventually lead to damage of and escape from the phagocyte.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mib.2010.05.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • C. glabrata cells resist killing by macrophages and have evolved distinct strategies for intracellular survival.

    “Of note, C. glabrata cells also resist killing by macrophages and have evolved distinct strategies for intracellular survival (Otto and Howard, 1976; Kaur et al., 2007; Seider et al., 2010).”
  • Fps1, a homologue of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae acetate channel, is also upregulated inside macrophages.

    “Another observation supporting this hypothesis is that Fps1, a homologue of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae acetate channel, is also upregulated inside macrophages (Seider et al., 2010).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 77 · Cited by 167

Authors
Seider, K., Heyken, A., Lüttich, A., Miramón, P., & Hube, B.
Affiliations
Leibniz-Institut für Naturstoff-Forschung und Infektionsbiologie e. V. - Hans-Knöll-Institut (HKI) (DE)
Corresponding author
Hube, Bernhard
Venue
Current Opinion in Microbiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-08
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
392-400
ISSN
1369-5274 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035155416
Cited by
167
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
pathogenic yeasts, phagocytes, phagocytosis evasion, macrophages, neutrophils, intracellular survival, Candida, Histoplasma, Cryptococcus, fungal persistence, host-pathogen interaction
MeSH terms
Humans, Macrophages, Mycoses, Neutrophils, Phagocytes, Phagocytosis, Yeasts, Host-Pathogen Interactions, Immune Evasion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review