Cited by 107Tuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyMycobacterium research and diagnosisInfectious Diseases and Tuberculosis

Evolution of virulence in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex

Orgeur, Mickael, Brosch, Roland·2018·Current Opinion in Microbiology

Abstract

Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the causative agent of human tuberculosis is one of the most widely spread human pathogens. It has succeeded to infect a quarter of the global human population by developing most sophisticated ways to circumvent innate and adaptive immune defences. This highly specialized, major human pathogen has evolved from a pool of ancestral environmental mycobacteria, whose extant representatives are known under the name of Mycobacterium canettii. Recent whole genome analyses in combination with different phenotypic screens have provided key insights into the evolution of M. tuberculosis and closely related members regrouped in the M. tuberculosis complex (MTBC). They have also elucidated novel virulence determinants that are essential for these obligate pathogens. In this review, we present the most recent evolutionary models of the MTBC and various factors that have contributed to the outstanding evolutionary success of the tuberculosis agent.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mib.2017.11.021

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In contrast to M. canettii strains, DNA transfer between M. tuberculosis strains was not observed despite numerous trials, emphasizing the clonal population structure of M. tuberculosis strains.

    “In contrast to M. canettii strains, DNA transfer between M. tuberculosis strains was not observed despite numerous trials (55), emphasizing the clonal population structure of M. tuberculosis strains (58,59).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 107

Authors
Orgeur, M., & Brosch, R.
Affiliations
Institut Pasteur (FR)
Corresponding author
Brosch, Roland
Venue
Current Opinion in Microbiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
41
Pages
68-75
ISSN
1369-5274 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2771278397
Cited by
107
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 7
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Agence National de Recherche (ANR-10-LABX-62-IBEID, ANR-16-CE15-0003, ANR-16-CE35-0009)
  • Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (SPF20160936136, DEQ20130326471)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
Keywords
Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, virulence evolution, Mycobacterium canettii, nontuberculous mycobacteria, host immune evasion, virulence factors, whole-genome analysis, evolutionary models, tuberculosis pathogenesis
MeSH terms
Humans, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Phylogeny, Tuberculosis, Virulence, Genome, Bacterial, Evolution, Molecular, Virulence Factors, Host-Pathogen Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review