The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pathogenesis of microbial keratitis
Open accessAbstract
Microbial keratitis is a sight-threatening ocular infection caused by bacteria, fungi, and protist pathogens. Epithelial defects and injuries are key predisposing factors making the eye susceptible to corneal pathogens. Among bacterial pathogens, the most common agents responsible for keratitis include Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus pneumonia and Serratia species. Fungal agents of corneal infections include both filamentous as well as yeast, including Fusarium, Aspergillus, Phaeohyphomycetes, Curvularia, Paecilomyces, Scedosporium and Candida species, while in protists, Acanthamoeba spp. are responsible for causing ocular disease. Clinical features include redness, pain, tearing, blur vision and inflammation but symptoms vary depending on the causative agent. The underlying molecular mechanisms associated with microbial pathogenesis include virulence factors as well as the host factors that aid in the progression of keratitis, resulting in damage to the ocular tissue. The treatment therefore should focus not only on the elimination of the culprit but also on the neutralization of virulence factors to minimize the damage, in addition to repairing the damaged tissue. A complete understanding of the pathogenesis of microbial keratitis will lead to the rational development of therapeutic interventions. This is a timely review of our current understanding of the advances made in this field in a comprehensible manner. Coupled with the recently available genome sequence information and high throughput genomics technology, and the availability of innovative approaches, this will stimulate interest in this field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gravet, A., Colin, D. A., Keller, D., Giradot, R., Monteil, H., & Prévost, G. (1998) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/s0014-5793(98)01130-2 · Cited by 177
Corneal virulence of Staphylococcus aureus: roles of alpha-toxin and protein A in pathogenesis
Callegan, M. C., Engel, L. S., Hill, J. M., & O'Callaghan, R. J. (1994) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.62.6.2478-2482.1994 · Cited by 149
Cited by
Jian, H.-J., Wu, R.-S., Lin, T.-Y., Li, Y.-J., Lin, H.-J., Harroun, S. G., Lai, J.-Y., & Huang, C.-C. (2017) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b01023 · Cited by 507
Niosomal drug delivery systems for ocular disease-recent advances and future prospects
Durak, S., Esmaeili Rad, M., Alp Yetisgin, A., Eda Sutova, H., Kutlu, O., Cetinel, S., & Zarrabi, A. (2020) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano10061191 · Cited by 196
Metadata
- Authors
- Lakhundi, S., Siddiqui, R., & Khan, N. A.
- Venue
- Microbial Pathogenesis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-03
- Volume
- 104
- Pages
- 97-109
- ISSN
- 0882-4010 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2564560812
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.