The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Immunomodulatory and ameliorative effects of Lactobacillus and Saccharomyces based probiotics on pathological effects of eimeriasis in broilers
Abstract
Eimeria infection is very important in broilers and causes heavy economic losses in extensive farming system due to reduced weight gains, high mortality and poor feed conversion ratio (FCR). Under the circumstances, there is a dire need to devise effective control strategies to avoid/counteract this infectious threat. This study was conducted to assess the immunomodulatory and ameliorative effects of Lactobacillus and Saccharomyces based probiotics against Eimeria infection in broilers. The results showed statistically higher (P < 0.05) lymphoproliferative responses in experimental groups treated either with Lactobacillus or Saccharomyces based probiotics, as compared to control group. Further higher antibody titers (geomean titers) were also recorded in chickens of experimental groups treated with probiotics as compared to those of control group. The probiotic treated groups also revealed significantly improved (P < 0.05) FCRs as compared to control group. In challenge experiment, significantly lower (P < 0.05) oocyst counts were recorded in broilers treated with probiotics, when compared with control group. Further, experimental groups also revealed significantly higher (P < 0.05) daily weight gains and protection rates as compared to control. The data regarding the lesion scoring showed that chickens treated with probiotics had higher values of percent protection against intestinal and caecal lesion, when compared with those of control group. In conclusion, supplementation…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While most previous meta-analyses align with our pooled result, one review by Dabrowski et al. reported no significant benefit for patients exposed to antibiotics (19, 39, 40).”
From Efficacy of probiotic supplementation in preventing Clostridioides difficile infection: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [40]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 46
Research works printed but not linked: 56
- Awais, 2018, Evaluation of Saccharum officinarum L. bagasse-derived polysaccharides as native immunomodulatory and anticoccidial agents in broilers, Vet. Parasitol., 249, 74, 10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.11.012 · DOI
- Williams, 2005, Intercurrent coccidiosis and necrotic enteritis of chickens: rational, integrated disease management by maintenance of gut integrity, Avian Pathol., 34, 159, 10.1080/03079450500112195 · DOI
- Dalloul, 2006, Poultry coccidiosis: recent advancements in control measures and vaccine development, Expert Rev. Vaccines, 5, 143, 10.1586/14760584.5.1.143 · DOI
- Arabkhazaeli, 2013, Evaluating the resistance of Eimeria spp. Field isolates to anticoccidial drugs using three different indices, Iran, J. Parasitol., 8, 234
- Chapman, 2002, Sustainable coccidiosis control in poultry production: the role of live vaccines, Int. J. Parasitol., 32, 617, 10.1016/S0020-7519(01)00362-9 · DOI
- Li, 2005, Responses of chickens vaccinated with a live attenuated multi-valent ionophore-tolerant Eimeria vaccine, Vet. Parasitol., 129, 179, 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.09.034 · DOI
- Kogut, 1988, The role of lymphokines or gamma (γ) interferon in host defense of chickens to Eimeria tenella, Vet. Parasitol., 29, 295, 10.1016/0304-4017(88)90134-3 · DOI
- Patterson, 2003, Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production, Poultry Sci., 82, 627, 10.1093/ps/82.4.627 · DOI
- Ritzi, 2014, Effects of probiotics and application methods on performance and response of broiler chickens to an Eimeria challenge, Poultry Sci., 93, 2772, 10.3382/ps.2014-04207 · DOI
- Ohimain, 2012, The effect of probiotic and prebiotic feed supplementation on chicken health and gut microflora: a review, Int. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 4, 135
- Mountzouris, 2010, Effects of probiotic inclusion levels in broiler nutrition on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, plasma immunoglobulins, and cecal microflora composition, Poultry Sci., 89, 58, 10.3382/ps.2009-00308 · DOI
- Travers, 2011, Probiotics for the control of parasites: an overview, J. Parasitol. Res., 2011, 610769, 10.1155/2011/610769 · DOI
- Soltan Dallal, 2015, Effects of probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus casei on colorectal tumor cells activity (CaCo-2), Arch. Iran. Med., 18, 167
- Higgins, 2007, Temporal effects of lactic acid bacteria probiotic culture on Salmonella in neonatal broilers, Poultry Sci., 86, 1662, 10.1093/ps/86.8.1662 · DOI
- Hosoi T, 1999, Changes in fecal microflora induced by intubation of mice with Bacillus subtilis (natto) spores are dependent upon dietary components, Can. J. Microbiol., 45, 59, 10.1139/w98-206 · DOI
- Dalloul, 2005, Induction of local protective immunity to Eimeria acervulina by a Lactobacillus- based probiotic, Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 28, 351, 10.1016/j.cimid.2005.09.001 · DOI
- Farnell, 2006, Upregulation of oxidative burst and degranulation in chicken heterophils stimulated with probiotic bacteria, Poultry Sci., 85, 1900, 10.1093/ps/85.11.1900 · DOI
- Gao, 2008, Effects of yeast culture in broiler diets on performance and immunomodulatory functions, Poultry Sci., 87, 1377, 10.3382/ps.2007-00418 · DOI
- Yalcin, 2008, Yeast culture supplementation to laying hen diets containing soybean meal or sunflower seed meal and its effect on performance, egg quality traits, and blood chemistry, J. Appl. Poultry Res., 17, 229, 10.3382/japr.2007-00064 · DOI
- Sonmez, 1999, Effects of supplementation of zinc bacitracin, mannan oligosaccharide, and probiotic into the broiler feeds on morphology of the small intestine, Uludag Univ. Vet. Fac. Derg., 18, 125
- Mountzouris, 2015, Evaluation of yeast dietary supplementation in broilers challenged or not with Salmonella on growth performance, cecal microbiota composition and Salmonella in ceca, cloacae and carcass skin, Poultry Sci., 94, 2445, 10.3382/ps/pev243 · DOI
- Awais, 2011, Immunotherapeutic effects of some sugarcane (SaccharumofficinarumL.) extracts against coccidiosis in industrial broiler chickens, Exp. Parasitol., 128, 104, 10.1016/j.exppara.2011.02.024 · DOI
- Ryley, 1976, Methods in coccidosis research: separation of oocysts from faeces, Parasitology, 73, 311, 10.1017/S0031182000046990 · DOI
- Corrier, 1990, Comparison of phytohemagglutinin-induced cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions in the interdigital skin of broiler and layer chicks, Avian Dis., 34, 369, 10.2307/1591421 · DOI
- Awais, 2013, Saccharum officinarum derived mid molecular mass glycoproteins as native BRMs in chickens, Pak. J. Life Soc. Sci., 11, 200
- Johnson, 1970, Anticoccidial drugs: lesion scorings techniques in battery and floor-pen experiments with chickens, Exp. Parasitol., 28, 30, 10.1016/0014-4894(70)90063-9 · DOI
- Khaliq, 2017, Evaluation of immunotherapeutic effects of Aloe vera polysaccharides against coccidiosis in chicken, Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg., 23, 895
- Angelakis, 2013, Related actions of probiotics and antibiotics on gut microbiota and weight modification, Lancet, 13, 889, 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70179-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Kechagia, 2013, Health benefits of probiotics: a Review, ISRN Nutrition, 2013, 481651, 10.5402/2013/481651 · DOI
- Edens, 2003, An alternative for antibiotic use in poultry: probiotics, Braz. J. Poult. Sci., 5, 75, 10.1590/S1516-635X2003000200001 · DOI
- Guarner, 2003, Gut flora in health and disease, Lancet, 361, 512, 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12489-0 · DOI
- Lee, 2007, Influence of Pediococcus-based probiotics on coccidiosis in broiler chickens, Poultry Sci., 86, 63, 10.1093/ps/86.1.63 · DOI
- Lensing, 2012, Efficacy of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product on intestinal health and productivity of coccidian-challenged laying hens, Poultry Sci., 91, 1590, 10.3382/ps.2011-01508 · DOI
- Ashraf, 2014, Immune system stimulation by probiotic microorganisms, Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 54, 938, 10.1080/10408398.2011.619671 · DOI
- Kamilya, 2015, Inactivated Probiotic bacteria stimulate cellular immune responses of Catlacatla (Hamilton) in Vitro, Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins, 7, 101, 10.1007/s12602-015-9191-9 · DOI
- Koenen, 2004, Immunomodulation by probiotic Lactobacillus in layer- and meat-type chickens, Br. Poultry Sci., 45, 355, 10.1080/00071660410001730851 · DOI
- Yuan, 2015, Yeast product supplementation modulated humoral and mucosal immunity and uterine inflammatory signals in transition dairy cows, J. Dairy Sci., 98, 3236, 10.3168/jds.2014-8469 · DOI
- Broadway, 2015, Live yeast and yeast cell wall supplements enhance immune function and performance in food-producing livestock: a review, Microorganisms, 3, 417, 10.3390/microorganisms3030417 · DOI
- Majtan, 2005, Stimulation of TNF-alpha release by fungal cell wall polysaccharides, Z. Naturforsch. C Biosci., 60, 921, 10.1515/znc-2005-11-1216 · DOI
- Xiao, 2004, A genome-wide screen identifies a single beta-defensin gene cluster in the chicken: implications for the origin and evolution of mammalian defensins, BMC Genomics, 5, 56, 10.1186/1471-2164-5-56 · DOI
- Lammers, 2004, Adoptive transfer of natural antibodies to non-immunized chickens affects subsequent antigen-specific humoral and cellular immune responses, Dev. Comp. Immunol., 28, 51, 10.1016/S0145-305X(03)00102-2 · DOI
- Haghighi, 2005, Modulation of antibody-mediated immune response by probiotics in chickens, Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol., 12, 1387, 10.1128/CDLI.12.12.1387-1392.2005 · DOI
- Nikpiran, 2013, Influence of Probiotic and Prebiotic on broiler chicken's performance and immune status, J. Nov. Appl. Sci., 2, 256
- Hemaiswarya, 2013, Mechanism of action of probiotics, J. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol., 56, 113, 10.1590/S1516-89132013000100015 · DOI
- Haldar, 2011, Effects of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and yeast protein concentrate on production performance of broiler chickens exposed to heat stress and challenged with Salmonella enteritidis, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 168, 61, 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.03.007 · DOI
- Wolfenden, 2011, Evaluation of selected direct-fed microbial candidates on live performance and Salmonella reduction in commercial Turkey brooding houses, Poultry Sci., 90, 2627, 10.3382/ps.2011-01360 · DOI
- Giannenas, 2014, Assessment of probiotics supplementation via feed or water on the growth performance, intestinal morphology and microflora of chickens after experimental infection with Eimeria acervulina, Eimeria maxima and Eimeria tenella, Avian Pathol., 43, 209, 10.1080/03079457.2014.899430 · DOI
- Patel, 2010, Evaluation of probiotics characteristics of Siderophoregenic Bacillus Spp. Isolated from dairy waste, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 160, 140, 10.1007/s12010-009-8583-2 · DOI
- Liu, 2006, Dynamic changes of T lymphocyte subpopulations in immune organs of chicks infected with Eimeria necatrix, Acta Vet. Zootech. Sin., 37, 168
- Gil de los santos, 2005, Bacillus cereus var. toyoii and Saccharomyces boulardii increased feed efficiency in broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis, Br. Poultry Sci., 46, 494, 10.1080/00071660500181461 · DOI
- Idris, 1997, Quantitative pathology of small intestinal coccidiosis caused by Eimeria maxima in young broilers, Avian Pathol., 26, 731, 10.1080/03079459708419249 · DOI
- Eizaguirre, 2002, Probiotic supplementation reduces the risk of bacterial translocation in experimental short bowel syndrome, J. Pediatr. Surg., 37, 699, 10.1053/jpsu.2002.32256 · DOI · Paper page
- Badran, 2006, Control of coccidiosis and different coccidia of chicken in selected technologies used in tropics and subtropics, Agric. Tropica Subtropica, 39, 39
- Chen, 2017, Pretreatment with a heat-killed probiotic modulates monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and reduces the pathogenicity of influenza and enterovirus 71 infections, Mucosal Immunol., 10, 215, 10.1038/mi.2016.31 · DOI
- Haddaji, 2015, Effect of high temperature on viability of Lactobacillus casei and analysis of secreted and GroeL proteins profiles, African J. Bacteriol. Res., 7, 29
- Mohapatra, 2014, Beneficial effects of dietary probiotics mixture on hemato-immunology and cell apoptosis of labeorohita fingerlings reared at higher water temperatures, PloS One, 9, 10.1371/journal.pone.0100929 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Awais, M. M., Jamal, M. A., Akhtar, M., Hameed, M. R., Anwar, M. I., & Ullah, M. I.
- Affiliations
- Bahauddin Zakariya University (PK)
- Corresponding author
- Awais, Mian Muhammad
- Venue
- Microbial Pathogenesis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 126
- Pages
- 101-108
- ISSN
- 0882-4010 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2899139542
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 3.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Microbial Pathogenesis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Coccidia and coccidiosis research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Keywords
- probiotics, Lactobacillus, Saccharomyces, Eimeria infection, coccidiosis, broiler chickens, immunomodulation, antibody titers, lymphoproliferation, feed conversion ratio, oocyst count, intestinal lesions, caecal lesions, growth performance, poultry disease control
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Feed, Chickens, Coccidiosis, Disease Models, Animal, Eimeria, Immunity, Intestines, Lactobacillus, Poultry Diseases, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Weight Gain, Probiotics, Oocysts, Immunomodulation, Disease Resistance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immunomodulatory and ameliorative effects of Lactobacillus and Saccharomyces based probiotics on pathological effects of eimeriasis in broilers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.micpath.2018.10.038
- The paper
- Awais, M. M., Jamal, M. A., Akhtar, M., Hameed, M. R., Anwar, M. I., & Ullah, M. I. (2019). Immunomodulatory and ameliorative effects of Lactobacillus and Saccharomyces based probiotics on pathological effects of eimeriasis in broilers. Microbial Pathogenesis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2018.10.038