Cited by 10Helminth infection and controlParasites and Host InteractionsMollusks and Parasites Studies

Newly excysted juveniles (NEJs) of Fasciola gigantica induce mice liver fibrosis and M2 macrophage-like phenotype in vivo

Open access
Zhang, Yaoyao, Mei, Xuefang, Liang, Yiying, Zhu, Bin, Sheng, Zhaoan, Shi, Wei, Wang, Dongying, Huang, Weiyi·2020·Microbial Pathogenesis

Abstract

Liver flukes of animals are parasitic flatworms of major socioeconomic importance in many countries. Particularly, Fasciola gigantica is a leading cause of production losses to the livestock (mainly sheep and cattle) and meat industries due to clinical disease, reduced weight gain and milk production, and deaths. Immune responses induced by helminth have been extensively studied, but there is limited information on this aspect by F. gigantica, especially on macrophages induced with this parasite. Studies have shown that host immune responses induced by parasitic infection is greatly correlated with the macrophage polarization axis. In the present study, we used the murine model of F. gigantica to explore the interaction of host and F. gigantica. We found F. gigantica NEJs promoted pathology and fibrosis of mice liver, and the enlargement of mice spleen. We also showed that macrophages were recruited to mice peritoneal cavity at 5 days post infection. By evaluating the expression of genetic markers of M2 macrophages such as Arg-1, Ym1 and RELMɑ, and genetic marker of M1 macrophages iNOS, we showed that M2 macrophages were induced by F. gigantica. M2 macrophages are central to the immune response during helminth infection, and our findings in this study provided insight into the immune interaction between F. gigantica and host.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103909

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In chronic viral hepatitis or parasitic infections, excessive anti-inflammatory polarization may impair pathogen clearance and perpetuate chronic inflammation.

    “In these settings, excessive anti-inflammatory polarization may impair pathogen clearance and perpetuate chronic inflammation, thereby reshaping macrophage function (129–135).”

Cited by

Authors
Zhang, Y., Mei, X., Liang, Y., Zhu, B., Sheng, Z., Shi, W., Wang, D., & Huang, W.
Affiliations
  • Guangxi University (CN)
  • Shanxi Agricultural University (CN)
  • Guangxi Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Dongying
  • Huang, Weiyi
Venue
Microbial Pathogenesis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
139
Pages
103909
ISSN
0882-4010 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2992674520
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Microbial Pathogenesis (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasites and Host Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Mollusks and Parasites Studies
Keywords
Fasciola gigantica, liver fluke, newly excysted juveniles, liver fibrosis, M2 macrophages, macrophage polarization, host-parasite immune interaction, helminthiasis, Arg1, Ym1, RELMα, inducible nitric oxide synthase, splenomegaly, mouse model
MeSH terms
Animals, Fasciola, Fasciola hepatica, Fascioliasis, Female, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Macrophages, Male, Phenotype, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review