Newly excysted juveniles (NEJs) of Fasciola gigantica induce mice liver fibrosis and M2 macrophage-like phenotype in vivo
Open accessAbstract
Liver flukes of animals are parasitic flatworms of major socioeconomic importance in many countries. Particularly, Fasciola gigantica is a leading cause of production losses to the livestock (mainly sheep and cattle) and meat industries due to clinical disease, reduced weight gain and milk production, and deaths. Immune responses induced by helminth have been extensively studied, but there is limited information on this aspect by F. gigantica, especially on macrophages induced with this parasite. Studies have shown that host immune responses induced by parasitic infection is greatly correlated with the macrophage polarization axis. In the present study, we used the murine model of F. gigantica to explore the interaction of host and F. gigantica. We found F. gigantica NEJs promoted pathology and fibrosis of mice liver, and the enlargement of mice spleen. We also showed that macrophages were recruited to mice peritoneal cavity at 5 days post infection. By evaluating the expression of genetic markers of M2 macrophages such as Arg-1, Ym1 and RELMɑ, and genetic marker of M1 macrophages iNOS, we showed that M2 macrophages were induced by F. gigantica. M2 macrophages are central to the immune response during helminth infection, and our findings in this study provided insight into the immune interaction between F. gigantica and host.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In chronic viral hepatitis or parasitic infections, excessive anti-inflammatory polarization may impair pathogen clearance and perpetuate chronic inflammation.
“In these settings, excessive anti-inflammatory polarization may impair pathogen clearance and perpetuate chronic inflammation, thereby reshaping macrophage function (129–135).”
From Strategies to promote liver fibrosis amelioration with involvement of restorative macrophages (2026) · cites this paper as [133]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Strategies to promote liver fibrosis amelioration with involvement of restorative macrophages
Aquino, J. B. (2026) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2026.1792423 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhang, Y., Mei, X., Liang, Y., Zhu, B., Sheng, Z., Shi, W., Wang, D., & Huang, W.
- Affiliations
- Guangxi University (CN)
- Shanxi Agricultural University (CN)
- Guangxi Medical University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Dongying
- Huang, Weiyi
- Venue
- Microbial Pathogenesis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 139
- Pages
- 103909
- ISSN
- 0882-4010 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2992674520
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Microbial Pathogenesis (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasites and Host Interactions
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Mollusks and Parasites Studies
- Keywords
- Fasciola gigantica, liver fluke, newly excysted juveniles, liver fibrosis, M2 macrophages, macrophage polarization, host-parasite immune interaction, helminthiasis, Arg1, Ym1, RELMα, inducible nitric oxide synthase, splenomegaly, mouse model
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Fasciola, Fasciola hepatica, Fascioliasis, Female, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Macrophages, Male, Phenotype, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review