Cited by 53Probiotics and Fermented FoodsPolysaccharides Composition and ApplicationsBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

’Ropy’ Phenotype, Exopolysaccharides and Metabolism: Study on Food Isolated Potential Probiotics LAB

Open access
Cirrincione, Simona, Breuer, Yael, Mangiapane, Erika, Mazzoli, Roberto, Pessione, Enrica·2018·Microbiological Research

Abstract

Lactic acid bacteria are fully recognized for their industrial applications among which the production and release of exopolysaccharides. In the present investigation, we screened fifteen Lactobacilli in order to find ropy strains, quantify exopolysaccharides and detect proteins specifically associated with the ropy-exopolysaccharide production. The highest ropy-exopolysaccharide producer (L. helveticus 6E8), was grown in stimulating and basal condition (10% and 2% lactose) and subjected to comparative proteomic analysis. The levels of 4 proteins were found significantly increased in the membrane fraction under stimulating conditions: a specific exopolysaccharide biosynthetic protein, a stress-induced protein, a protein involved in secretion and an ATP-synthase subunit. Conversely, several enzymes involved in anabolism and protein synthesis were decreased. These results suggest a general shift from growth to exopolysaccharide-mediated protection from the hyperosmotic environment. Due to the great interest in exopolysaccharides with novel features, the identification of these proteins could have implications for future improvements of industrial strains.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.micres.2018.07.004

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The composition of the culture medium, including added nutrients as growth enhancers, is one of the most important factors affecting EPS production.

    “The composition of the culture medium, including added nutrients as growth enhancers, is one of the most important factors affecting EPS production [55].”

    From Lactic Acid Bacteria Exopolysaccharides Producers: A Sustainable Tool for Functional Foods (2021) · cites this paper as [55]

    The Introduction says culture conditions can be manipulated to increase EPS production and gives the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio as an example. Section 3.2 discusses increased EPS biosynthesis in high-sugar media. The copy does not characterize added nutrients as growth enhancers or establish medium composition as one of the most important factors. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • MRS media supplemented with sucrose, fructose or maltose is generally used to screen HoPS production.

    “For instance, de Man Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) media supplemented with sucrose, fructose or maltose is generally used to screen HoPS production [37,55,56].”

    From Lactic Acid Bacteria Exopolysaccharides Producers: A Sustainable Tool for Functional Foods (2021) · cites this paper as [55]

    Sections 2.2 and 3.1 describe screening for the ropy phenotype using sugar-supplemented media, including sucrose and fructose. But the medium was semi-defined medium (SDM), not MRS; the tested sugars did not include maltose, and the screen was not described as specific to HoPS production. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The presence of different carbohydrates as a carbon source can significantly affect the formation of ropy filaments, leading to misinterpretation of ropy phenotypes.

    “Furthermore, the presence of different carbohydrates as a carbon source can significantly affect the formation of ropy filaments, leading to misinterpretation of ropy phenotypes [55].”

    From Lactic Acid Bacteria Exopolysaccharides Producers: A Sustainable Tool for Functional Foods (2021) · cites this paper as [55]

    Section 3.2 reports that lactose was better at inducing the ropy phenotype and cites another strain whose ropyness decreased with fructose as its sole sugar source. But in the strains studied here, RP-positive strains remained positive across the tested sugars; the paper does not show that carbohydrate choice caused a misinterpretation of their ropy phenotypes. Section 3.1 instead identifies scarce biomass as a difficulty in detecting filaments. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The phenol-sulfuric acid method is the most widely used method of calculating EPS yield.

    “A colorimetric procedure for the determination of total carbohydrate (expressed as glucose equivalents per unit of weight) by phenol-sulfuric acid method is the most widely used method of calculating EPS yield [27,33,34,42,43,44,49,55,99,102].”

    From Lactic Acid Bacteria Exopolysaccharides Producers: A Sustainable Tool for Functional Foods (2021) · cites this paper as [55]

    Section 2.3.4 reports using the phenol-sulfuric-acid method with glucose as the standard to determine EPS content. The paper does not say it is the most widely used method for calculating EPS yield. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Ethanol is commonly used for precipitation of EPS, although isopropanol, acetone or a mixture of acetone and ethanol have also been used.

    “For the following precipitation of EPS, ethanol is commonly used [27,42,43,50,55,58,99], although isopropanol [100], acetone [33] or a mixture of acetone and ethanol [101] have been also used.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 65 · Cited by 53

Authors
Cirrincione, S., Breuer, Y., Mangiapane, E., Mazzoli, R., & Pessione, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Pessione, Enrica
Venue
Microbiological Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
214
Pages
137-145
ISSN
0944-5013 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2874216812
Cited by
53
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Microbiological Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem
  • Università degli Studi di Torino
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
exopolysaccharide production, lactic acid bacteria, Lactobacillus helveticus, probiotics, proteomics, hyperosmotic stress, stress proteins, ATP synthase, membrane proteins, lactose concentration, industrial strain improvement
MeSH terms
Bacterial Proteins, Bacteriological Techniques, Culture Media, Food Microbiology, Lactobacillus, Lactose, Phenotype, Polysaccharides, Bacterial, Probiotics, Proteome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review