Influence of surface modification on selective CO2 adsorption: A technical review on mechanisms and methods
Open accessAbstract
The mitigation of climate change, abatement of greenhouse gas emissions and thus, fundamentally, the separation of CO2 from various gas streams are some of the most pressing and multifaceted issues that we face as a society. De-carbonising our entire civilisation will come at a great cost and requires vast amounts of knowledge, initiative and innovation; yet, no matter how much time or money is spent, some sectors simply cannot be de-carbonised without the deployment of carbon capture and storage technologies. The technical challenges associated with the removal of CO2 are not universal – there exists no single solution. Capturing the CO2 on solid sorbents has been gaining traction in recent years given its cost-effectiveness as a result of its ease of application, relatively small energy requirements and applicability in a wide range of processes. Even with the myriad materials such as zeolites, carbons, metal organic frameworks, mesoporous silicas and polymers, the challenge to identify a sorbent with optimal capacity, kinetics, selectivity, stability and ultimately, viability, still persists. By tailoring these solid materials through comprehensive campaigns of surface modification, the pitfalls of each can be mollified and the strengths enhanced. This highly specific tailoring must be well informed so as to understand the mechanisms by which the CO2 is adsorbed, the surface chemistry that has influence on this process, and what methods exist to facilitate the improvement of this. This review endeavours to identify the surface functional groups that interact with the CO2 molecules during adsorption and the methods by which these functional groups can be introduced. It also provides a comprehensive review of the recent attempts and advancements made within the scientific community in the experimental applications of such methods to enhance CO2 capture via adsorption processes. The primary search engine employed in this critical review was Scopus. Of the 421 references cited that embody the literature focussed on surface modification for enhancing the selective adsorption of CO2, 370 are original research papers, 43 are review articles and 7 are conference proceedings.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In terms of CO2 adsorption, micropores and alkalinity play a more crucial role.
“Nevertheless, in terms of CO 2 adsorption, micropores and alkalinity play more crucial role (Goel etal. 2021; Petrovic et al. 2021).”
From Lignin-impregnated biochar assisted with microwave irradiation for CO2 capture: adsorption performance and mechanism (2024) · cites this paper as Petrovic et al. 2021
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 427 · Cited by 381
- Authors
- Petrovic, B., Gorbounov, M., & Masoudi Soltani, S.
- Affiliations
- Brunel University of London (GB)
- Venue
- Microporous and Mesoporous Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 312
- Pages
- 110751
- ISSN
- 1387-1811 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3096815884
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 427
- Citations by year
- 2026: 61 · 2025: 91 · 2024: 85 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 22
- FWCI
- 17.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Microporous and Mesoporous Materials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Industrial Gas Emission Control
- Keywords
- CO2 adsorption, surface modification, CO2 capture, solid sorbents, surface functional groups, adsorption selectivity, surface chemistry, carbon capture and storage, metal-organic frameworks, zeolites, mesoporous silica, carbon adsorbents, polymers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review