SEM characterization of anatomical variation in chitin organization in insect and arthropod cuticles
Abstract
The cuticles of insects and arthropods have some of the most diverse material properties observed in nature, so much so that it is difficult to imagine that all cutciles are primarily composed of the same two materials: a fibrous chitin network and a matrix composed of cuticle proteins. Various factors contribute to the mechanical and optical properties of an insect or arthropod cuticle including the thickness and composition. In this paper, we also identified another factor that may contribute to the optical, surface, and mechanical properties of a cuticle, i.e. the organization of chitin nanofibers and chitin fiber bundles. Self-assembled chitin nanofibers serve as the foundation for all higher order chitin structures in the cuticles of insects and other arthropods via interactions with structural cuticle proteins. Using a technique that enables the characterization of chitin organization in the cuticle of intact insects and arthropod exoskeletons, we demonstrate a structure/function correlation of chitin organization with larger scale anatomical structures. The chitin scaffolds in cuticles display an extraordinarily diverse set of morphologies that may reflect specific mechanical or physical properties. After removal of the proteinaceous and mineral matrix of a cuticle, we observe using SEM diverse nanoscale and micro scale organization of in-situ chitin in the wing, head, eye, leg, and dorsal and ventral thoracic regions of the periodical cicada Magicicada septendecim and…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Chitosan exists in alpha, beta, and gamma structural forms that influence its solubility, crystallinity, and overall functional properties.
“Chitosan exists in different structural forms, known as alpha (α-), beta (β-), and gamma (γ-), presenting unique properties that influence its suitability for anti-adhesion barrier applications [152,153]. These variants influence the polymer’s solubility, crystallinity, and overall functional properties.”
From Biomaterials in Postoperative Adhesion Barriers and Uterine Tissue Engineering (2025) · cites this paper as [152]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biomaterials in Postoperative Adhesion Barriers and Uterine Tissue Engineering
Fazel Anvari-Yazdi, A., Badea, I., & Chen, X. (2025) · Gels · doi:10.3390/gels11060441 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chandran, R., Williams, L., Hung, A., Nowlin, K., & LaJeunesse, D.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
- North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- LaJeunesse, Dennis
- Venue
- Micron
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 82
- Pages
- 74-85
- ISSN
- 0968-4328 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2214363459
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 2.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Micron (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- North Carolina Biotechnology Center (NCBC) Biotechnology Research Grant
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Studies on Chitinases and Chitosanases
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
- Keywords
- chitin nanofibers, insect cuticle, arthropod exoskeleton, cuticular proteins, Drosophila melanogaster, Farfantepenaeus aztecus, structure-function relationship, anatomical variation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Arthropods, Chitin, Drosophila melanogaster, Hemiptera, Insecta, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Proteins, Wings, Animal, Mutagenesis, Insertional, Penaeidae, Nanofibers, Animal Shells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review