Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 13

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Peak minimisation-based gate delay compensation for active current balancing of parallel IGBT system

Tripathi, Ravi Nath, Tsukuda, M., Omura, I.·2019·Microelectronics Reliability

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.microrel.2019.113426

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Perez-Delgado, 2016, Current sharing control strategy for IGBTs connected in parallel, J. Power Electron, 16, 769, 10.6113/JPE.2016.16.2.769 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bortis, 2008, Active gate control for current balancing of parallel connected IGBT modules solid-state modulators, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 36, 2632, 10.1109/TPS.2008.2003971 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Alvarez, 2014, Sinusoidal current operation of delay-time compensation for parallel-connected IGBTs, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 50, 3485, 10.1109/TIA.2014.2305905 · DOI · Paper page
  4. R.N. Tripathi, M. Tsukuda and I. Omura A fully digital feedback control of gate driver for current balancing of parallel connected power devices, Microelectron. Reliab.. 88-90 (2018) 505–509. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 13

Metadata

Authors
Tripathi, R. N., Tsukuda, M., & Omura, I.
Venue
Microelectronics Reliability
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
100-101
Pages
113426
ISSN
0026-2714
Cited by
13
References
1
Language
en
Funders
New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Peak minimisation-based gate delay compensation for active current balancing of parallel IGBT system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.microrel.2019.113426
The paper
Tripathi, R. N., Tsukuda, M., & Omura, I. (2019). Peak minimisation-based gate delay compensation for active current balancing of parallel IGBT system. Microelectronics Reliability. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microrel.2019.113426

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.