Weight management during pregnancy: A systematic review of qualitative evidence
Abstract
Background increasing overweight and obesity rates in pregnant women present health risks to mother and unborn infant. Objectives to identify barriers and facilitators to implementing and carrying out maternal weight management interventions. Search strategy searches were carried out in medical, midwifery and nursing databases, augmented by hand searching of midwifery journals. Selection criteria articles were included that were published in the UK after 1990, with a focus on women's and health professional's views about weight management during pregnancy. Data collection and analysis from 6423 citations, 126 full text papers were retrieved. Of these, 18 (reporting 17 studies) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Included papers were assessed for quality. Reported findings were analysed and synthesised using thematic analysis. Main results a major theme was access to relevant and appropriate information; advice was reported as vague or inadequate. Overweight or obese women reported feelings of stigmatisation during routine examinations. Health professionals reported a reluctance to discuss weight with larger women. Perceived risk to the fetus as well as changes in women's physiological responses to pregnancy, were reported barriers to optimal physical activity and dietary intake. Perceptions of control were related to women's feelings about their body image. Conclusion evidence suggests that the complexity of interactions with advice sources, bodily changes, feelings of control, as well as perceived risks may explain the relative ineffectiveness of weight management interventions during pregnancy. Focusing on healthy diet and physical activity levels may be more useful and less stigmatising than focusing on weight.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Johnson et al. systematic review concluded that focusing on weight may be a barrier to optimising diet and physical activity in pregnant women.
“A systematic review by Johnson et al. 112 concluded that focusing on weight may be a barrier to optimising diet and physical activity in pregnant women.”
From Overweight, obesity and excessive weight gain in pregnancy as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: A narrative review (2022) · cites this paper as [112]
Midwives fear a hostile response from women that they are trying to form a professional bond with.
“Midwives may lack the confidence to raise the issue of obesity and fear a hostile response from women that they are trying to form a professional bond with 112 , 117”
From Overweight, obesity and excessive weight gain in pregnancy as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: A narrative review (2022) · cites this paper as [112]
Midwives may lack the confidence to raise the issue of obesity.
“Midwives may lack the confidence to raise the issue of obesity and fear a hostile response from women that they are trying to form a professional bond with 112 , 117”
From Overweight, obesity and excessive weight gain in pregnancy as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: A narrative review (2022) · cites this paper as [112]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 32 · Cited by 85
- Authors
- Johnson, M., Campbell, F., Messina, J., Preston, L., Buckley Woods, H., & Goyder, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Johnson, Maxine
- Venue
- Midwifery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1287-1296
- ISSN
- 0266-6138 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136152152
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 2.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Midwifery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Keywords
- maternal weight management, pregnancy, maternal obesity, overweight in pregnancy, weight management interventions, barriers and facilitators, clinician attitudes, stigmatization, body image, perceived control, physical activity, dietary recommendations, prenatal care, maternal and fetal health
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Body Weight, Diet, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Obesity, Patient Care Management, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Exercise, Pregnant People, Pregnant Women
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review