Cited by 85Obesity and Health PracticesGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Weight management during pregnancy: A systematic review of qualitative evidence

Johnson, Maxine, Campbell, Fiona, Messina, Josie, Preston, Louise, Buckley Woods, Helen, Goyder, Elizabeth·2013·Midwifery

Abstract

Background increasing overweight and obesity rates in pregnant women present health risks to mother and unborn infant. Objectives to identify barriers and facilitators to implementing and carrying out maternal weight management interventions. Search strategy searches were carried out in medical, midwifery and nursing databases, augmented by hand searching of midwifery journals. Selection criteria articles were included that were published in the UK after 1990, with a focus on women's and health professional's views about weight management during pregnancy. Data collection and analysis from 6423 citations, 126 full text papers were retrieved. Of these, 18 (reporting 17 studies) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Included papers were assessed for quality. Reported findings were analysed and synthesised using thematic analysis. Main results a major theme was access to relevant and appropriate information; advice was reported as vague or inadequate. Overweight or obese women reported feelings of stigmatisation during routine examinations. Health professionals reported a reluctance to discuss weight with larger women. Perceived risk to the fetus as well as changes in women's physiological responses to pregnancy, were reported barriers to optimal physical activity and dietary intake. Perceptions of control were related to women's feelings about their body image. Conclusion evidence suggests that the complexity of interactions with advice sources, bodily changes, feelings of control, as well as perceived risks may explain the relative ineffectiveness of weight management interventions during pregnancy. Focusing on healthy diet and physical activity levels may be more useful and less stigmatising than focusing on weight.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.midw.2012.11.016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 32 · Cited by 85

Authors
Johnson, M., Campbell, F., Messina, J., Preston, L., Buckley Woods, H., & Goyder, E.
Affiliations
University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Johnson, Maxine
Venue
Midwifery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
29
Issue
12
Pages
1287-1296
ISSN
0266-6138 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136152152
Cited by
85
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Midwifery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
maternal weight management, pregnancy, maternal obesity, overweight in pregnancy, weight management interventions, barriers and facilitators, clinician attitudes, stigmatization, body image, perceived control, physical activity, dietary recommendations, prenatal care, maternal and fetal health
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Weight, Diet, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Obesity, Patient Care Management, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Exercise, Pregnant People, Pregnant Women

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review