CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 46

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Caseload midwifery in a multi-ethnic community: The women's experiences

Beake, Sarah, Acosta, Luisa, Cooke, Pauline, McCourt, Christine·2013·Midwifery
DOI 10.1016/j.midw.2013.01.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.midw.2013.01.003

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Beck, 2006, Pentadic cartography: mapping birth trauma narratives, Qualitative Health Research, 16, 453, 10.1177/1049732305285968 · DOI
  2. Benjamin, 2001, A comparison of partnership caseload midwifery care with conventional team midwifery care; labour and birth outcomes, Midwifery, 17, 234, 10.1054/midw.2001.0257 · DOI
  3. CMACE, 2011, Saving mothers’ lives. Reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–2008. The eighth report of the confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries, British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 118, 1, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02847.x · DOI
  4. De Souza, 2004, Improving services for disadvantaged childbearing women, Child: Care, Health and Development, 30, 599, 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2004.00471.x · DOI
  5. Dykes, 2003, Adolescent mothers and breastfeeding: experiences and support needs—an exploratory study, Journal of Human Lactation, 19, 391, 10.1177/0890334403257562 · DOI
  6. Entwistle, 2010, Speaking up about safety concerns: multi-setting qualitative study of patients’ views and experiences, Quality and Safety in Health Care, 19, e33
  7. Finlay, 2009, “Someone's rooting for you”: Continuity and Advocacy in Bureaucratic Maternal Health Care Systems, Social Science and Medicine, 69, 1228, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.029 · DOI
  8. Green, 1990, Expectations, experiences, and psychological outcomes of childbirth: a prospective study of 825 women, Birth, 17, 15, 10.1111/j.1523-536X.1990.tb00004.x · DOI
  9. Haggerty, 2003, Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review, British Medical Journal, 327, 1219, 10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1219 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Harper-Bulman, 2002, Somali refugee women's views and experiences of maternity care in West London, Critical Public Health, 12, 365, 10.1080/0958159021000029568 · DOI
  11. Hatem, M., Sandall, J., Devane, D., Soltani, H., Gates, S., 2008. Midwife-led versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub2. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Homer, 2001, Collaboration in maternity care: a randomized controlled trial comparing community-based continuity of care with standard hospital care, British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 108, 16, 10.1016/S0306-5456(00)00022-X · DOI · Paper page
  13. Homer, 2002, Women's experiences of continuity of midwifery care in a randomised controlled trial in Australia, Midwifery, 18, 102, 10.1054/midw.2002.0298 · DOI
  14. Hunter, 2006, The importance of reciprocity in relationships between community-based midwives and mothers, Midwifery, 22, 308, 10.1016/j.midw.2005.11.002 · DOI
  15. Lyndon, 2011, Predictors of likelihood of speaking up about safety concerns in labour and delivery, BMJ Quality and Safety
  16. Mackintosh, 2010, Overcoming gendered and professional hierarchies in order to facilitate escalation of care in emergency situations: the role of standardized communication protocols, Social Science & Medicine, 71, 1683, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.07.037 · DOI
  17. McAree, 2010, Perceptions of group practice midwifery from women living in an ethnically diverse setting, Evidence Based Midwifery, 8, 91
  18. McCourt, 1998, Evaluation of one-to-one midwifery: women's responses to care, Birth, 25, 73, 10.1046/j.1523-536x.1998.00073.x · DOI
  19. McCourt, 2000, Does continuity of carer matter to women from minority ethnic groups?, Midwifery, 16, 145, 10.1054/midw.2000.0204 · DOI
  20. McCourt, 2006, Supporting choice and control? Communication and interaction between midwives and women at the antenatal booking visit, Social Science & Medicine, 62, 1307, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.07.031 · DOI
  21. McLeish, 2005, Maternity experiences of asylum seekers in England, British Journal of Midwifery, 13, 782, 10.12968/bjom.2005.13.12.20125 · DOI
  22. Nutting, 2003, Continuity of primary care: to whom does it matter and when?, Annals of Family Medicine, 1, 149, 10.1370/afm.63 · DOI
  23. Page, 2001, Clinical outcomes of one-to-one midwifery practice, British Journal of Midwifery, 9, 700, 10.12968/bjom.2001.9.11.9417 · DOI
  24. Pilnick, 2011, On the remarkable persistence of asymmetry in doctor/patient interaction: a critical review, Social Science & Medicine, 72, 1374, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.033 · DOI
  25. Pope, 2009, Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data, British Medical Journal, 329, 114
  26. Raleigh, 2010, Ethnic and social inequalities in women's experience of maternity care in England: results of a national survey, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 103, 188, 10.1258/jrsm.2010.090460 · DOI
  27. Rowe, 2001, Does poor communication contribute to stillbirths and infant deaths? A review, Journal of Public Health Medicine, 23, 23, 10.1093/pubmed/23.1.23 · DOI
  28. Tanassi, 2004, Compliance as strategy: the importance of personalised relations in obstetric practice, Social Science & Medicine, 59, 2053, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.03.009 · DOI
  29. Williams, 2010, Mothers’ views of caseload midwifery and the value of continuity of care at an Australian regional hospital, Midwifery, 26, 615, 10.1016/j.midw.2009.02.003 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 46

Metadata

Authors
Beake, S., Acosta, L., Cooke, P., & McCourt, C.
Venue
Midwifery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-08
Volume
29
Issue
8
Pages
996-1002
ISSN
0266-6138
DOI
10.1016/j.midw.2013.01.003
Cited by
46
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review