Cited by 136Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsPregnancy-related medical research

The experience of psychological distress, depression, and anxiety during pregnancy: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research

Staneva, Aleksandra A., Bogossian, Fiona, Wittkowski, Anja·2015·Midwifery

Abstract

Objective to systematically review qualitative research that explores the experience of maternal antenatal psychological distress, such as depression, anxiety and stress during pregnancy. Method a meta-synthesis was conducted to integrate the findings of qualitative studies. Eight final eligible studies were scrutinised, recurring themes were extracted and compared across studies, and core themes were identified. Findings five core themes of the experience of pregnancy distress were identified: Recognising that things are not right, Dealing with stigma, Negotiating the transformation, Spiralling down, and Regaining control. In the interpretation of these concepts the experience of maternal antenatal distress was depicted as a process similar to the one of grief and loss, as a result of women׳s inability to situate their experience within the 'perfect mother' discourse. Key conclusions women who experience psychological distress undergo a specific process of transformation towards motherhood that begins during pregnancy. This process is exacerbated by their interpretation of their experience as deviant and often as inadequate. Implications for practice this review will assist health professionals in translating and negotiating the transformation towards motherhood for women experiencing pregnancy distress, in a timely and meaningful manner.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.midw.2015.03.015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 136

Authors
Staneva, A. A., Bogossian, F., & Wittkowski, A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Venue
Midwifery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
563-573
ISSN
0266-6138 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W306670608
Cited by
136
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Midwifery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
Keywords
antenatal depression, prenatal anxiety, maternal distress, pregnancy, motherhood, stigma, grief and loss, women's experiences, maternal mental health
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Mothers, Pregnancy, Stress, Psychological, Qualitative Research, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review