The experience of psychological distress, depression, and anxiety during pregnancy: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research
Abstract
Objective to systematically review qualitative research that explores the experience of maternal antenatal psychological distress, such as depression, anxiety and stress during pregnancy. Method a meta-synthesis was conducted to integrate the findings of qualitative studies. Eight final eligible studies were scrutinised, recurring themes were extracted and compared across studies, and core themes were identified. Findings five core themes of the experience of pregnancy distress were identified: Recognising that things are not right, Dealing with stigma, Negotiating the transformation, Spiralling down, and Regaining control. In the interpretation of these concepts the experience of maternal antenatal distress was depicted as a process similar to the one of grief and loss, as a result of women׳s inability to situate their experience within the 'perfect mother' discourse. Key conclusions women who experience psychological distress undergo a specific process of transformation towards motherhood that begins during pregnancy. This process is exacerbated by their interpretation of their experience as deviant and often as inadequate. Implications for practice this review will assist health professionals in translating and negotiating the transformation towards motherhood for women experiencing pregnancy distress, in a timely and meaningful manner.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pregnant Latinas noted that receiving exposure therapy could subject them to familial and community stigma.
“Pregnant Latinas noted that receiving exposure therapy could subject them to familial and community stigma (e.g., labeled as crazy or bad mothers)”
From Exposure Therapy Acceptability Among Pregnant Latinas With Anxiety: A Qualitative Content Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Staneva et al., 2015
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 136
- Authors
- Staneva, A. A., Bogossian, F., & Wittkowski, A.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Venue
- Midwifery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 563-573
- ISSN
- 0266-6138 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W306670608
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 0.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Midwifery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
- Keywords
- antenatal depression, prenatal anxiety, maternal distress, pregnancy, motherhood, stigma, grief and loss, women's experiences, maternal mental health
- MeSH terms
- Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Mothers, Pregnancy, Stress, Psychological, Qualitative Research, Social Stigma
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review