Women's lived experience of compassionate midwifery: human and professional
Abstract
Objective To develop an understanding of women's lived experience of compassionate midwifery DESIGN: A qualitative study using the principles of Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). Data was collected during interviews with 17 women who identified themselves as having received compassionate midwifery care.Findings Women participants' experience of compassionate care from midwives was experienced through a sense of a midwife Being With them, Being in Relationship with them and Empowerment. Women were also aware of the way midwives were able to Balance potentially conflicting aspects of their work, in order to provide compassionate care. Two other themes which emerged through extensive analysis of the data related to how women set their experience of compassion in the context of their personal suffering and that compassion made a difference. These themes will be reported separately.Conclusion and implications for practice The unique contribution of this study was to provide a window into the nature of women's lived experiences of compassionate midwifery and thus building, understanding around the qualities of compassionate midwifery and its impact on women. The findings are important because they challenge assumptions that compassion is ill-defined and therefore difficult to teach. On the contrary, compassionate midwifery was easily identified by women participants and had the features of an effective intervention for relieving their suffering. A dynamic model of Compassionate Midwifery in Balance has been proposed, providing a much-needed tool to inform practice, education and policy. Further research will build on this work by focussing on women in varied circumstances, environments and cultures and on understanding the lived experience of compassionate midwifery from the midwife's perspective.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Communication and touch are key elements in women's experiences of compassionate care.
“These findings are supported by research undertaken by Menage et al. (2020) who found communication and touch were key elements in women's experiences of compassionate care.”
From Stranger in a mask” midwives’ experiences of providing perinatal bereavement care to parents during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ireland: a qualitative descriptive study (2022) · cites this paper as Menage et al. (2020)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 34
- Authors
- Menage, D., Bailey, E., Lees, S., & Coad, J.
- Affiliations
- University Hospital Coventry (GB)
- Coventry University (GB)
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Venue
- Midwifery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 85
- Pages
- 102662
- ISSN
- 0266-6138 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3006436949
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 2.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Midwifery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Coventry University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
- Keywords
- women's experiences, midwife-patient relationship, empowerment, childbirth care
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Empathy, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Life Change Events, Midwifery, Mothers, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review