Experiences with the routine use of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale from health visitors’ and midwives’ perspectives – An exploratory qualitative study
Abstract
Background The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale has been practiced as a routine screening for postnatal depression at a municipal health care centre for more than ten years. Objectives The aim of this study was to examine how health visitors and midwives perceive and practice this routine screening. Study design We chose an exploratory qualitative approach, with analysis of data from focus group interviews. Methods Ten health visitors and two midwives participated in two focus group interviews by sharing their thoughts and reflections. The analysis was performed in collaboration with all authors according to thematic network analysis. Findings The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale is well accepted as a screening tool. In addition to giving health visitors and midwives information about mothers who need special attention concerning mental health challenges, the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale is a tool for talking about problems related to early motherhood. A trusting relationship is a prerequisite for these conversations. The health visitors seldom use the word 'depression' in contact with the individual mother. They sometimes lose opportunities to identify mothers in need of help because of a tight time schedule and social and cultural factors. Collaboration on a daily basis with colleagues and family therapists, and monthly guidance from mental health professionals are necessary to secure professional quality and confidence. Conclusion The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale is a useful screening tool, but there are social and cultural challenges, and the available time during screening consultations is often too short. Collaboration with and guidance from other professionals are necessary.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Factors that can assist in the early diagnosis of PPD by community nurses include home visits, explicitly stating that the purpose of the visit is to treat both the mother and the baby, longer meetings without time constraints, and continuity of care.
“Among these factors are home visits, explicitly stating that the purpose of the visit is to treat both the mother and the baby, longer meetings without time constraints, and continuity of care.”
From Challenges in diagnosing and treating postpartum depression in the primary care Setting- a qualitative study (2025) · cites this paper as [24]
There is significant importance in collaboration among nurses, family physicians, and psychiatrists to provide adequate treatment for PPD.
“Furthermore, there is significant importance in collaboration among nurses, family physicians, and psychiatrists to provide adequate treatment for PPD [24].”
From Challenges in diagnosing and treating postpartum depression in the primary care Setting- a qualitative study (2025) · cites this paper as [24]
Cites
“Outing” the Researcher: The Provenance, Process, and Practice of Reflexivity
Finlay, L. (2002) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/104973202129120052 · Cited by 1,937 · see citing works
Impact of postpartum depressive symptoms on mother and her 18-month-old infant
Righetti-Veltema, M., Bousquet, A., & Manzano, J. (2003) · European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s00787-003-0311-9 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Assessing mental health during pregnancy: An exploratory qualitative study of midwives’ perceptions
Baker, N., Gillman, L., & Coxon, K. (2020) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2020.102690 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Krepak, D. K., Kopit, A. B., Biderman, A., Yehoshua, I., & Adler, L. (2025) · BMC Primary Care · doi:10.1186/s12875-025-03004-8 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Vik, K., Aass, I. M., Willumsen, A. B., & Hafting, M.
- Affiliations
- Sørlandet Sykehus (NO)
- University of Bergen (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Vik, Kari
- ORCID
- Hafting, Marit
- Venue
- Midwifery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-09
- Volume
- 100
- Pages
- 103017
- ISSN
- 0266-6138 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3153976858
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 1.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Midwifery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Keywords
- Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, postpartum depression screening, health visitors, midwives, early motherhood, maternal mental health, professional collaboration, family therapists
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Midwifery, Pregnancy, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Depression, Postpartum, Qualitative Research, Nurses, Community Health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review