Cited by 77Microbial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringBiofuel production and bioconversion

Targeted gene engineering in Clostridium cellulolyticum H10 without methylation

Cui, Gu-zhen, Hong, Wei, Zhang, Jie, Li, Wen-li, Feng, Yingang, Liu, Ya-jun, Cui, Qiu·2012·Journal of Microbiological Methods

Abstract

Genetic engineering of Clostridium cellulolyticum has been developed slowly compared with that of other clostridial species, and one of the major reasons might be the restriction and modification (RM) system which degrades foreign DNA. Here, a putative MspI endonuclease gene, ccel2866, was inactivated by a ClosTron-based gene disruption method. The resulting C. cellulolyticum mutant H10ΔmspI lost the MspI endonuclease activity and can accept unmethylated DNA efficiently. Following that, an oxygen-independent green fluorescence protein gene was introduced into H10ΔmspI without methylation, generating a convenient reporter system to evaluate the expression of heterologous protein in C. cellulolyticum by green fluorescence. To further demonstrate the efficiency of the H10ΔmspI, double mutants H10ΔmspIΔldh and H10ΔmspIΔack were constructed by disrupting lactate dehydrogenase gene ccel2485 and acetate kinase gene ccel2136 in H10ΔmspI, respectively, without DNA methylation, and the stability of the double mutation was confirmed after the 100th generation. The mutant H10ΔmspI constructed here can be used as a platform for further targeted gene manipulation conveniently and efficiently. It will greatly facilitate the metabolic engineering of C. cellulolyticum aiming at faster cellulose degradation and higher biofuel production at the molecular level.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mimet.2012.02.015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 77

Authors
Cui, G.-Z., Hong, W., Zhang, J., Li, W.-L., Feng, Y., Liu, Y.-J., & Cui, Q.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Cui, Qiu
Venue
Journal of Microbiological Methods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
89
Issue
3
Pages
201-208
ISSN
0167-7012 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085019719
Cited by
77
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Microbiological Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional knowledge base (Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
Keywords
Clostridium cellulolyticum, restriction-modification systems, DNA methylation, GFP reporter, heterologous expression, lactate dehydrogenase, acetate kinase, metabolic engineering, cellulose degradation, biofuel production
MeSH terms
DNA, Bacterial, Genetic Engineering, Molecular Sequence Data, Transformation, Bacterial, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Genes, Reporter, Gene Targeting, Deoxyribonuclease HpaII, DNA Methylation, Clostridium cellulolyticum, Ruminiclostridium cellulolyticum, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Gene Knockout Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review