Mineral carbon storage in pre-treated ultramafic ores
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ultramafic rock-hosted ore deposits favored for integrated mineral carbonation technologies include chrysotile, nickel, chromium, diamond, and platinum group element mines.
“The ultramafic rock-hosted ore deposits that are favored for integrated mineral carbonation technologies include chrysotile [63], nickel [64-66], chromium [67,68], diamond [69] and platinum group element (PGE) mines [70,71].”
From Integrated Mineral Carbonation of Ultramafic Mine Deposits—A Review (2018) · cites this paper as [64]
Cites
Gadikota, G., Matter, J., Kelemen, P., & Park, A.-H. A. (2014) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c3cp54903h · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Transparency on greenhouse gas emissions from mining to enable climate change mitigation
Azadi, M., Northey, S. A., Ali, S. H., & Edraki, M. (2020) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/s41561-020-0531-3 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Utilization of mineral carbonation products: current state and potential
Woodall, C. M., McQueen, N., Pilorgé, H., & Wilcox, J. (2019) · Greenhouse Gases Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/ghg.1940 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Recent developments and challenges of aqueous mineral carbonation: a review
Veetil, S. P., & Hitch, M. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-020-02776-z · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Integrated Mineral Carbonation of Ultramafic Mine Deposits—A Review
Li, J., Hitch, M., Power, I., & Pan, Y. (2018) · Minerals · doi:10.3390/min8040147 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
“Okanogan nickel deposit, WA; Thompson nickel bell, MB Serpentine Pure CO2 TA, CA DC aqueous [64]”
BackgroundKularatne, K., Sissmann, O., Kohler, E., Chardin, M., Noirez, S., & Martinez, I. (2018) · Applied Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2018.05.020 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bobicki, E. R., Liu, Q., & Xu, Z.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Qingxia
- Venue
- Minerals Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 70
- Pages
- 43-54
- ISSN
- 0892-6875 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089340283
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 1.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Minerals Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Vale and a Collaborative Research and Development
- NSERC
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
- Keywords
- microwave pretreatment, magnesium leaching, catechol, Tiron, cost reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
