The DOI matches its Crossref record; 241 of the 243 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards a low-carbon society: A review of lithium resource availability, challenges and innovations in mining, extraction and recycling, and future perspectives
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Open-pit lithium mining currently accounts for more than half the world's production (Tabelin et al., 2021).”
From Lithium and water: Hydrosocial impacts across the life cycle of energy storage (2024) · cites this paper as Tabelin et al., 2021
In the citing paper
“Multiple sources report a range of values for the carbon intensity of EV production [99,105-109]. However, they mostly have the same magnitude and coalesce around 140 kg CO2/kWh, with about 25% of emissions coming from mining to cathode production, 40% from cell production, and the remaining 35% from pack production.”
From Lithium Supply Chain Optimization: A Global Analysis of Critical Minerals for Batteries (2024) · cites this paper as [106]
In the citing paper
“Multiple sources report a range of values for the carbon intensity of EV production [99,105-109]. However, they mostly have the same magnitude and coalesce around 140 kg CO2/kWh, with about 25% of emissions coming from mining to cathode production, 40% from cell production, and the remaining 35% from pack production.”
From Lithium Supply Chain Optimization: A Global Analysis of Critical Minerals for Batteries (2024) · cites this paper as [106]
Citations
Cites
Geochemistry of hydrothermal ore deposits
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-2126 · Cited by 3,853
From Lithium‐Ion to Sodium‐Ion Batteries: Advantages, Challenges, and Surprises
Nayak, P. K., Yang, L., Brehm, W., & Adelhelm, P. (2017) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201703772 · Cited by 2,688
The lithium-ion battery: State of the art and future perspectives
Zubi, G., Dufo‐López, R., Carvalho, M., & Paşaoğlu, G. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.002 · Cited by 2,681
Recovery and recycling of lithium: a review
Swain, B. (2017) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2016.08.031 · Cited by 1,713
The Essential Toxin: Impact of Zinc on Human Health
Plum, L. M., Rink, L., & Haase, H. (2010) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph7041342 · Cited by 1,577
Tarascon, J. (2010) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.680 · Cited by 1,165
Global lithium resources: relative importance of pegmatite, brine and other deposits
Kesler, S. E., Gruber, P. W., Medina, P. A., Keoleian, G. A., Everson, M. P., & Wallington, T. J. (2012) · Ore Geology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2012.05.006 · Cited by 1,140
Hein, J. R., Mizell, K., Koschinsky, A., & Conrad, T. A. (2012) · Ore Geology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2012.12.001 · Cited by 1,121
Potential of lithium-ion batteries in renewable energy
Diouf, B., & Pode, R. (2015) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2014.11.058 · Cited by 1,120
Recycling of Spent Lithium-Ion Battery: A Critical Review
Zeng, X., Li, J., & Singh, N. P. (2013) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2013.763578 · Cited by 956
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Ezama, I., de los Hoyos, C., Cortesgoso, P., Braun, T., 2018. Direct extraction lithium processes: The challenges of spent brine disposal, tailings and mine waste conference 2018, AusIMM, Brisbane.
- Klein, K., Gaines, L., 2012. Reducing foreign lithium dependence through coproduction of lithium from geothermal brine. In: Lithium Use in Batteries: Demand and Supply Considerations, pp. 1–11.
- Market, J., Byrne, C., Robinson, D., Jeanneau, P., Rossiter, H., 2019. Downhole assays in Pilbara. In: The Proceedings of Iron Ore 2019, Perth, WA, pp. 372–392.
- Rio Tinto, 2018. Press release — Jadar Project fact sheet 2018. <https://www.riotinto.com/documents/RT_Jadar_factsheet_EN.pdf> (Accessed: September 21, 2019).
- Tiihonen, M., Haavanlammi, L., Kinnunen, S., Kolehmainen, E., 2019. Outotec lithium hydroxide process-a novel direct leach process for the production of battery grade lithium hydroxide monohydrate from calcined spodumene. In Proceedings of ALTA 2019. ALTA Metallurgical Services Perth, Australia.
- USGS, 2016. Mineral commodity summaries 2016: U.S. Geological Survey, 202 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/70140094. · DOI
- Vitolo, S., Cialdella, M.L., 1995. Silica separation from reinjection brines having different compositions at Moste Amiata geothermal plant. In: Proc. World Geothermal Congress, pp. 2463–2466.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Environmental impact of direct lithium extraction from brines
Vera, M. L., Torres, W. R., Galli, C. I., Chagnes, A., & Flexer, V. (2023) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-022-00387-5 · Cited by 766
Toward Direct Regeneration of Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries: A Next-Generation Recycling Method
Wang, J., Ma, J., Zhuang, Z., Liang, Z., Jia, K., Ji, G., Zhou, G., & Cheng, H. (2024) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00884 · Cited by 513
Martins, L. S., Guimarães, L. F., Botelho Junior, A. B., Tenório, J. A. S., & Espinosa, D. C. R. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113091 · Cited by 361
Bradu, P., Biswas, A., Nair, C., Sreevalsakumar, S., Patil, M., Kannampuzha, S., Mukherjee, A. G., Wanjari, U. R., Renu, K., Vellingiri, B., et al. (2022) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-022-20024-4 · Cited by 327
RetractedTabelin, C. B., Park, I., Phengsaart, T., Jeon, S., Villacorte-Tabelin, M., Alonzo, D., Yoo, K., Ito, M., & Hiroyoshi, N. (2021) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105610 · Cited by 281
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tabelin, C. B., Dallas, J., Casanova, S., Pelech, T., Bournival, G., Saydam, S., & Canbulat, I.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Tabelin, Carlito Baltazar
- ORCID
- Venue
- Minerals Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-03
- Volume
- 163
- Pages
- 106743
- ISSN
- 0892-6875 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3128488908
- Cited by
- 533
- References
- 243
- Citations by year
- 2026: 83 · 2025: 161 · 2024: 120 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 22
- FWCI
- 30.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Minerals Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Metals and Alloys › Extraction and Separation Processes
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Mining and Resource Management
- Keywords
- lithium, lithium mining, lithium recovery, lithium recycling, lithium-ion batteries, electric vehicles, renewable energy storage, low-carbon society, ferromanganese nodules, desalination brine, geothermal brine, coal fly ash, mining waste, space mining, material flow
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
