Williams syndrome transcription factor is critical for neural crest cell function in Xenopus laevis
Open accessAbstract
Williams Syndrome Transcription Factor (WSTF) is one of ∼25 haplodeficient genes in patients with the complex developmental disorder Williams Syndrome (WS). WS results in visual/spatial processing defects, cognitive impairment, unique behavioral phenotypes, characteristic "elfin" facial features, low muscle tone and heart defects. WSTF exists in several chromatin remodeling complexes and has roles in transcription, replication, and repair. Chromatin remodeling is essential during embryogenesis, but WSTF's role in vertebrate development is poorly characterized. To investigate the developmental role of WSTF, we knocked down WSTF in Xenopus laevis embryos using a morpholino that targets WSTF mRNA. BMP4 shows markedly increased and spatially aberrant expression in WSTF-deficient embryos, while SHH, MRF4, PAX2, EPHA4 and SOX2 expression are severely reduced, coupled with defects in a number of developing embryonic structures and organs. WSTF-deficient embryos display defects in anterior neural development. Induction of the neural crest, measured by expression of the neural crest-specific genes SNAIL and SLUG, is unaffected by WSTF depletion. However, at subsequent stages WSTF knockdown results in a severe defect in neural crest migration and/or maintenance. Consistent with a maintenance defect, WSTF knockdowns display a specific pattern of increased apoptosis at the tailbud stage in regions corresponding to the path of cranial neural crest migration. Our work is the first to describe a role for WSTF in proper neural crest function, and suggests that neural crest defects resulting from WSTF haploinsufficiency may be a major contributor to the pathoembryology of WS.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
BAZ1B has an established role in neural crest maintenance and migration in Xenopus laevis, and knockout mice show craniofacial defects.
“(i) its established role in NC maintenance and migration in Xenopus laevis and the craniofacial defects observed in knockout mice (10, 11);”
Mild neural crest deficits have been put forth as a unifying explanatory framework for the defining features of domestication syndrome, with BAZ1B listed among putative underlying genes because of its previously reported role in the neural crest of model organisms.
“Mild NC deficits have been put forth as a unifying explanatory framework for the defining features of the so-called domestication syndrome, with BAZ1B listed among the putative underlying genes because of its previously reported role in the NC of model organisms (5, 10, 11).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 85 · Cited by 48
- Authors
- Barnett, C., Yazgan, O., Kuo, H.-C., Malakar, S., Thomas, T., Fitzgerald, A., Harbour, W., Henry, J. J., & Krebs, J. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Alaska Anchorage (US)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Krebs, Jocelyn E.
- ORCID
- Henry, Jonathan J.
- Venue
- Mechanisms of Development
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 9-12
- Pages
- 324-338
- ISSN
- 0925-4773 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3459152
- OpenAlex
- W1995950066
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Mechanisms of Development (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Alaska Anchorage
- National Institutes of Health
- National Eye Institute (EY09844, R01EY009844, EY016029, R15EY016027)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P20GM103395)
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
- National Center for Research Resources (P20RR016466)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Williams Syndrome Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
- Keywords
- Williams syndrome, WSTF, haploinsufficiency, neural crest, neural crest migration, chromatin remodeling, BMP4, apoptosis, cranial neural crest, Xenopus laevis, morpholino knockdown
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Base Sequence, Cell Movement, Female, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Neural Crest, Transcription Factors, Xenopus laevis, Apoptosis, Williams Syndrome, Body Patterning, Xenopus Proteins, Embryonic Development, Gene Knockdown Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review