CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 25

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Decolorization of an anthraquinone dye by the recombinant dye-decolorizing peroxidase (rDyP) immobilized on mesoporous materials

Shakeri, Mozaffar, Shoda, Makoto·2008·Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic
DOI 10.1016/j.molcatb.2007.12.009
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molcatb.2007.12.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both the available examples of immobilised DyP showed great performance of the composite, with high reusability and stability and very high throughput, comparable to the values observed for AOPs.

    “It is also worth mentioning that both the available examples of immobilised DyP showed great performance of the composite, with high reusability and stability 190, 191 and very high throughput, comparable to the values observed for AOPs..”

    From Degradation of anthraquinone dyes from effluents: A review focusing on enzymatic dye degradation with industrial potential (2020) · cites this paper as [190]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Xu, 2005, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 71, 246, 10.1007/s00253-005-0144-1 · DOI
  2. Vyas, 1995, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 61, 3919, 10.1128/aem.61.11.3919-3927.1995 · DOI
  3. Torres, 2003, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 46, 1, 10.1016/S0926-3373(03)00228-5 · DOI
  4. Kim, 1995, J. Ferment. Bioeng., 79, 601, 10.1016/0922-338X(95)94755-G · DOI
  5. Sugano, 2000, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 66, 1754, 10.1128/AEM.66.4.1754-1758.2000 · DOI
  6. Conesa, 2002, J. Biotechnol., 93, 143, 10.1016/S0168-1656(01)00394-7 · DOI
  7. Shakeri, 2007, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 76, 919, 10.1007/s00253-007-1042-5 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Tischer, 1999, Top. Curr. Chem., 200, 95, 10.1007/3-540-68116-7_4 · DOI
  9. Krajewska, 2004, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 35, 126, 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2003.12.013 · DOI
  10. Saijo, 2005, Acta Crystallogr., F61, 729
  11. Sugano, 2006, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 73, 862, 10.1007/s00253-006-0545-9 · DOI
  12. Yiu, 2005, J. Mater. Chem., 15, 3690, 10.1039/b506090g · DOI
  13. Diaz, 1996, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 2, 115, 10.1016/S1381-1177(96)00017-3 · DOI
  14. Takahashi, 2000, Chem. Mater., 12, 3301, 10.1021/cm000487a · DOI
  15. Washmon-Kriel, 2000, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 10, 453, 10.1016/S1381-1177(99)00123-X · DOI
  16. Lei, 2004, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater., 73, 121, 10.1016/j.micromeso.2004.05.004 · DOI
  17. Inagaki, 1993, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 680, 10.1039/c39930000680 · DOI
  18. Zhao, 1998, Science, 279, 548, 10.1126/science.279.5350.548 · DOI
  19. Vinu, 2004, J. Phys. Chem.: B, 108, 7323, 10.1021/jp037303a · DOI
  20. Moelans, 2005, Catal. Commun., 6, 307, 10.1016/j.catcom.2005.02.005 · DOI
  21. Han, 2002, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 17, 1, 10.1016/S1381-1177(01)00072-8 · DOI
  22. Aburto, 2005, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater., 83, 193, 10.1016/j.micromeso.2005.04.008 · DOI
  23. Fadnavis, 2003, Biotechnol. Prog., 19, 346, 10.1021/bp025678s · DOI
  24. Salis, 2003, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1646, 145, 10.1016/S1570-9639(02)00556-3 · DOI
  25. Blanco, 2004, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 30, 83
  26. Hernandez-Ruiz, 2001, Biochem. J., 354, 107, 10.1042/bj3540107 · DOI
  27. Di Martino, 2003, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 46, 613, 10.1016/S0926-3373(03)00323-0 · DOI
  28. Gonzalez-Saiz, 2001, Eur. Polym. J., 37, 435, 10.1016/S0014-3057(00)00151-8 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shakeri, M., & Shoda, M.
Venue
Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-07
Volume
54
Issue
1-2
Pages
42-49
ISSN
1381-1177
DOI
10.1016/j.molcatb.2007.12.009
Cited by
25
References
0
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review