Cited by 154Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingFungal and yeast genetics researchGene Regulatory Network Analysis

The Role of Docking Interactions in Mediating Signaling Input, Output, and Discrimination in the Yeast MAPK Network

Open access
Reményi, Attila, Good, Matthew C., Bhattacharyya, Roby P., Lim, Wendell A.·2005·Molecular Cell

Abstract

Cells use a network of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) to coordinate responses to diverse extracellular signals. Here, we examine the role of docking interactions in determining connectivity of the yeast MAPKs Fus3 and Kss1. These closely related kinases are activated by the common upstream MAPK kinase Ste7 yet generate distinct output responses, mating and filamentous growth, respectively. We find that docking interactions are necessary for communication with the kinases and that they can encode subtle differences in pathway-specific input and output. The cell cycle arrest mediator Far1, a mating-specific substrate, has a docking motif that selectively binds Fus3. In contrast, the shared partner Ste7 has a promiscuous motif that binds both Fus3 and Kss1. Structural analysis reveals that Fus3 interacts with specific and promiscuous peptides in conformationally distinct modes. Induced fit recognition may allow docking peptides to achieve discrimination by exploiting subtle differences in kinase flexibility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.10.030

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 154

Authors
Reményi, A., Good, M. C., Bhattacharyya, R. P., & Lim, W. A.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Lim, Wendell A.
Venue
Molecular Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-12
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
951-962
ISSN
1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154586058
Cited by
154
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
MAPK signaling, FUS3, Kss1, Ste7, FAR1, mating response, filamentous growth, signal discrimination, induced fit, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, cell cycle arrest
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Cell Cycle, Enzyme Activation, Models, Molecular, Molecular Sequence Data, Protein Binding, Protein Kinases, Repressor Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Sequence Alignment, Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Crystallography, X-Ray, Cell Cycle Proteins, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases, MAP Kinase Signaling System, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review