Cited by 186DNA Repair MechanismsFungal and yeast genetics researchGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

The checkpoint clamp activates Mec1 kinase during initiation of the DNA damage checkpoint

Open access
Majka, Jerzy, Niedziela-Majka, Anita, Burgers, Peter M.J.·2006·Molecular Cell

Abstract

Yeast Mec1/Ddc2 protein kinase, the ortholog of human ATR/ATRIP, plays a central role in the DNA damage checkpoint. The PCNA-like clamp Rad17/Mec3/Ddc1 (the 9-1-1 complex in human) and its loader Rad24-RFC are also essential components of this signal transduction pathway. Here we have studied the role of the clamp in regulating Mec1, and we delineate how the signal generated by DNA lesions is transduced to the Rad53 effector kinase. The checkpoint clamp greatly activates the kinase activity of Mec1, but only if the clamp is appropriately loaded upon partial duplex DNA. Activated Mec1 phosphorylates the Ddc1 and Mec3 subunits of the clamp, the Rad24 subunit of the loader, and the Rpa1 and Rpa2 subunits of RPA. Phosphorylation of Rad53, and of human PHAS-1, a nonspecific target, also requires a properly loaded clamp. Phosphorylation and binding studies with individual clamp subunits indicate that the Ddc1 subunit mediates the functional interactions with Mec1.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.11.027

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 186

Authors
Majka, J., Niedziela-Majka, A., & Burgers, P. M. J.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Burgers, Peter M.J.
Venue
Molecular Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-12
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
891-901
ISSN
1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2151214957
Cited by
186
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 45948, GM-32431, R01GM045948, R01GM032431)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
DNA damage checkpoint, Mec1 kinase, Rad53 phosphorylation, RPA phosphorylation, clamp loading, Saccharomyces cerevisiae
MeSH terms
DNA Damage, DNA, Fungal, Models, Biological, Phosphoproteins, Phosphorylation, RNA Polymerase I, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Cell Cycle Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Checkpoint Kinase 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review