Chromosome-wide Rad51 Spreading and SUMO-H2A.Z-Dependent Chromosome Fixation in Response to a Persistent DNA Double-Strand Break
Open accessAbstract
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are acutely hazardous for cells, as they can cause genome instability. DSB repair involves the sequential recruitment of repair factors to the DSBs, followed by Rad51-mediated homology probing, DNA synthesis, and ligation. However, little is known about how cells react if no homology is found and DSBs persist. Here, by monitoring a single persistent DNA break, we show that, following DNA resection and RPA recruitment, Rad51 spreads chromosome-wide bidirectionally from the DSB but selectively only on the broken chromosome. Remarkably, the persistent DSB is later fixed to the nuclear periphery in a process that requires Rad51, the histone variant H2A.Z, its SUMO modification, and the DNA-damage checkpoint. Indeed, H2A.Z is deposited close to the break early but transiently and directs DNA resection, single DSB-induced checkpoint activation, and DSB anchoring. Thus, a persistent DSB induces a multifaceted response, which is linked to a specific chromatin mark.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies have shown the importance of histones in DNA damage response, senescence, brain aging, neuronal identity, and memory formation.
“Previous studies have shown the importance of histones in DNA damage response, senescence, brain aging, neuronal identity, and memory formation100–102,136–139.”
From Neuronal DNA double-strand breaks lead to genome structural variations and 3D genome disruption in neurodegeneration (2023) · cites this paper as [100]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 340
- Authors
- Kalocsay, M., Hiller, N. J., & Jentsch, S.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry (DE)
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Jentsch, Stefan
- Venue
- Molecular Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 335-343
- ISSN
- 1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095460783
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 9.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Molecular Cell (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
- Keywords
- DNA double-strand breaks, RAD51, H2A.Z, SUMOylation, DNA resection, RPA, DNA damage checkpoint, chromatin, nuclear periphery, genomic instability
- MeSH terms
- DNA, Fungal, Histones, Nuclear Envelope, Chromosomes, Fungal, SUMO-1 Protein, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Rad51 Recombinase, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review