Cited by 152DNA Repair MechanismsUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Tandem protein interaction modules organize the ubiquitin-dependent response to DNA double-strand breaks.

Open access
Panier, Stephanie, Ichijima, Yosuke, Fradet-Turcotte, Amélie, Leung, Charles C.Y., Kaustov, Lilia, Arrowsmith, Cheryl H., Durocher, Daniel·2012·Molecular Cell

Abstract

The response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) entails the hierarchical recruitment of proteins orchestrated by ATM-dependent phosphorylation and RNF8-mediated chromatin ubiquitylation. As in most ubiquitin-dependent processes, the ordered accumulation of DNA repair factors at the break site relies on ubiquitin-binding domains (UBDs). However, how UBDs select their ligands is poorly understood, and therefore we sought to uncover the basis for selectivity in the ubiquitin-dependent DSB response. We show that RNF168, its paralog RNF169, RAD18, and the BRCA1-interacting RAP80 protein accumulate at DSB sites through the use of bipartite modules composed of UBDs juxtaposed to peptide motifs that provide specificity. These sequences, named LR motifs (LRMs), are transferable, and we show that the RNF169 LRM2 binds to nucleosomes, the substrates of RNF168. The LRM-based selection of ligands is a parsimonious means to build a highly discrete ubiquitin-based signaling pathway such as the DNA damage response.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.045

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RNF168 promotes 53BP1 and BRCA1 localization to DSBs, while RNF169 competes with 53BP1 and BRCA1 for ubiquitin binding and inhibits this binding.

    “While RNF168 promotes 53BP1 and BCRA1 localization to sites of DSBs, RNF169 is a direct inhibitor of this binding. This is because, once RNF168 synthesizes H2A/H2AX ubiquitin chains, RNF169 competes with 53BP1 and BRCA1 for ubiquitin binding (Chen et al., 2012; Panier et al., 2012; Poulsen et al., 2012).”

    From USP7 Is a Master Regulator of Genome Stability (2020) · cites this paper as Panier et al., 2012

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 152

Authors
Panier, S., Ichijima, Y., Fradet-Turcotte, A., Leung, C. C. Y., Kaustov, L., Arrowsmith, C. H., & Durocher, D.
Affiliations
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Durocher, Daniel
Venue
Molecular Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-08
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
383-395
ISSN
1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081264027
Cited by
152
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 2
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP84297)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
DNA double-strand breaks, DNA damage response, ubiquitin-binding domain, RNF168, RAD18, RAP80, nucleosome binding, ATM signaling
MeSH terms
Carrier Proteins, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Nuclear Proteins, Phosphorylation, Ubiquitin, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, HCT116 Cells, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded, Ubiquitination, Histone Chaperones, HEK293 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review