Tandem protein interaction modules organize the ubiquitin-dependent response to DNA double-strand breaks.
Open accessAbstract
The response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) entails the hierarchical recruitment of proteins orchestrated by ATM-dependent phosphorylation and RNF8-mediated chromatin ubiquitylation. As in most ubiquitin-dependent processes, the ordered accumulation of DNA repair factors at the break site relies on ubiquitin-binding domains (UBDs). However, how UBDs select their ligands is poorly understood, and therefore we sought to uncover the basis for selectivity in the ubiquitin-dependent DSB response. We show that RNF168, its paralog RNF169, RAD18, and the BRCA1-interacting RAP80 protein accumulate at DSB sites through the use of bipartite modules composed of UBDs juxtaposed to peptide motifs that provide specificity. These sequences, named LR motifs (LRMs), are transferable, and we show that the RNF169 LRM2 binds to nucleosomes, the substrates of RNF168. The LRM-based selection of ligands is a parsimonious means to build a highly discrete ubiquitin-based signaling pathway such as the DNA damage response.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
RNF168 promotes 53BP1 and BRCA1 localization to DSBs, while RNF169 competes with 53BP1 and BRCA1 for ubiquitin binding and inhibits this binding.
“While RNF168 promotes 53BP1 and BCRA1 localization to sites of DSBs, RNF169 is a direct inhibitor of this binding. This is because, once RNF168 synthesizes H2A/H2AX ubiquitin chains, RNF169 competes with 53BP1 and BRCA1 for ubiquitin binding (Chen et al., 2012; Panier et al., 2012; Poulsen et al., 2012).”
From USP7 Is a Master Regulator of Genome Stability (2020) · cites this paper as Panier et al., 2012
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 152
- Authors
- Panier, S., Ichijima, Y., Fradet-Turcotte, A., Leung, C. C. Y., Kaustov, L., Arrowsmith, C. H., & Durocher, D.
- Affiliations
- Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Durocher, Daniel
- Venue
- Molecular Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 383-395
- ISSN
- 1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081264027
- Cited by
- 152
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 7.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Molecular Cell (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP84297)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Keywords
- DNA double-strand breaks, DNA damage response, ubiquitin-binding domain, RNF168, RAD18, RAP80, nucleosome binding, ATM signaling
- MeSH terms
- Carrier Proteins, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Nuclear Proteins, Phosphorylation, Ubiquitin, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, HCT116 Cells, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded, Ubiquitination, Histone Chaperones, HEK293 Cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review