Cited by 101DNA Repair MechanismsGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

Chromatin Reader Brd4 Functions in Ig Class Switching as a Repair Complex Adaptor of Nonhomologous End-Joining

Open access
Stanlie, Andre, Yousif, Ashraf S., Akiyama, Hideo, Honjo, Tasuku, Begum, Nasim A.·2014·Molecular Cell

Abstract

Class switch recombination (CSR) is a B cell-specific genomic alteration induced by activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID)-dependent DNA break at the immunoglobulin heavy-chain locus, followed by repair. Although chromatin-associated factors in promoting AID-induced DNA break have been widely reported, the involvement of chromatin adaptors at the repair phase of CSR remains unknown. Here, we show that the acetylated histone reader Brd4 is critical for nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) repair of AID- and I-SceI-induced DNA breaks. Brd4 was recruited to the DNA break regions, and its depletion from the chromatin caused CSR impairment without affecting the DNA break generation. Inhibition of Brd4 suppressed the accumulation of 53BP1 and uracil DNA glycosylase at the switch regions, perturbed the switch junctional microhomology, and reduced Igh/c-myc translocation. We conclude that Brd4 serves as a chromatin platform required for the recruitment of repair components during CSR and general DNA damage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.05.018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BRD4 can bind 53BP1 and recruit it to DNA double-strand break sites, thereby facilitating NHEJ in a transcriptionally independent manner.

    “BRD4 has the potential to bind 53BP1, a DNA damage response protein serving as an adaptor for the assembly and activation of the DNA repair machinery, and recruit it to DSB sites, thereby facilitating NHEJ in a transcriptionally independent manner32,33.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 64 · Cited by 101

Authors
Stanlie, A., Yousif, A. S., Akiyama, H., Honjo, T., & Begum, N. A.
Affiliations
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • Toray Industries, Inc. (Japan) (JP)
Corresponding author
Honjo, Tasuku
Venue
Molecular Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
97-110
ISSN
1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2135685490
Cited by
101
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
BRD4, class switch recombination, non-homologous end joining, activation-induced cytidine deaminase, chromatin reader, histone acetylation, DNA repair, 53BP1, uracil-DNA glycosylase, B cells, immunoglobulin heavy chain locus
MeSH terms
Bromodomain Containing Proteins, Animals, Cell Line, Chromatin, DNA Damage, Nuclear Proteins, Recombination, Genetic, Transcription Factors, Immunoglobulin Class Switching, Mice, DNA End-Joining Repair

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review