Cited by 209Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsEpigenetics and DNA MethylationChromatin Remodeling and Cancer

Determinants of Histone H3K4 Methylation Patterns

Open access
Soares, Luis M., He, P. Cody, Chun, Yujin, Suh, Hyunsuk, Kim, TaeSoo, Buratowski, Stephen·2017·Molecular Cell

Abstract

Various factors differentially recognize trimethylated histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4me3) near promoters, H3K4me2 just downstream, and promoter-distal H3K4me1 to modulate gene expression. This methylation "gradient" is thought to result from preferential binding of the H3K4 methyltransferase Set1/complex associated with Set1 (COMPASS) to promoter-proximal RNA polymerase II. However, other studies have suggested that location-specific cues allosterically activate Set1. Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) experiments show that H3K4 methylation patterns on active genes are not universal or fixed and change in response to both transcription elongation rate and frequency as well as reduced COMPASS activity. Fusing Set1 to RNA polymerase II results in H3K4me2 throughout transcribed regions and similarly extended H3K4me3 on highly transcribed genes. Tethered Set1 still requires histone H2B ubiquitylation for activity. These results show that higher-level methylations reflect not only Set1/COMPASS recruitment but also multiple rounds of transcription. This model provides a simple explanation for non-canonical methylation patterns at some loci or in certain COMPASS mutants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.10.013

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Divergent H3K4me1 peaks were located further away from TSSs, flanking CGIs and H3K4me3 boundaries.

    “Divergent H3K4me1 peaks were located further away from TSSs (Fig. 4a, b), which flanked CGIs and H3K4me3 boundaries44–46”

    From Alternative promoters in CpG depleted regions are prevalently associated with epigenetic misregulation of liver cancer transcriptomes (2023) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Results section (“H3K4 methylation patterns are not universal”; page unavailable) reports that H3K4me1 is generally shifted downstream relative to H3K4me2 and notes possible enrichment associated with divergent promoters. It does not report that divergent H3K4me1 peaks flank CGIs or H3K4me3 boundaries; that is the part most directly attached to this citation. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A fast RNA Pol II mutant shifts H3K4me2/me3 in the 3′ direction, while a slow mutant shifts these marks toward the 5′ end of genes.

    “Moreover, a fast RNA Pol II mutant shifts H3K4me2/me3 in the 3′ direction (Soares et al, 2017), while a slow RNA Pol II mutant shifts these marks toward the 5′ end of genes (Fong et al, 2017; Soares et al, 2017).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 209

Authors
Soares, L. M., He, P. C., Chun, Y., Suh, H., Kim, T., & Buratowski, S.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Buratowski, Stephen
Venue
Molecular Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
68
Issue
4
Pages
773-785.e6
ISSN
1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2767770944
Cited by
209
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 13
FWCI
6.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH (GM46498, GM56663)
  • Korean National Research Foundation (2013S1A2A2035342)
  • Harvard College Research Program
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Keywords
histone H3 lysine 4 methylation, H3K4me3, H3K4me2, H3K4me1, COMPASS complex, Set1, RNA polymerase II, transcription elongation, histone H2B ubiquitylation, allosteric activation, gene expression regulation
MeSH terms
Histones, Methylation, Models, Biological, Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces, Transcription Factors, Schizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins, Ubiquitination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review