Cited by 154Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesGenome Rearrangement Algorithms

The Landscape of L1 Retrotransposons in the Human Genome Is Shaped by Pre-insertion Sequence Biases and Post-insertion Selection

Open access
Sultana, Tania, van Essen, Dominic, Siol, Oliver, Bailly-Bechet, Marc, Philippe, Claude, Zine El Aabidine, Amal, Pioger, Léo, Nigumann, Pilvi +4 more·2019·Molecular Cell

Abstract

L1 retrotransposons are transposable elements and major contributors of genetic variation in humans. Where L1 integrates into the genome can directly impact human evolution and disease. Here, we experimentally induced L1 retrotransposition in cells and mapped integration sites at nucleotide resolution. At local scales, L1 integration is mostly restricted by genome sequence biases and the specificity of the L1 machinery. At regional scales, L1 shows a broad capacity for integration into all chromatin states, in contrast to other known mobile genetic elements. However, integration is influenced by the replication timing of target regions, suggesting a link to host DNA replication. The distribution of new L1 integrations differs from those of preexisting L1 copies, which are significantly reshaped by natural selection. Our findings reveal that the L1 machinery has evolved to efficiently target all genomic regions and underline a predominant role for post-integrative processes on the distribution of endogenous L1 elements.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.02.036

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LINE-1 comprises 17% of the human genome, about 500,000 copies, but only some 100-150 evolutionarily recent copies are full-length and lack mutations expected to affect function.

    “LINE-1 (L1) comprises 17% of the human genome (~500,000 copies); however, only some 100–150 evolutionarily recent element copies are full-length and lack mutations that would be expected to affect function10–12.”

    From The role of retrotransposable elements in ageing and age-associated diseases (2021) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Introduction states that L1 accounts for about 500,000 copies and 17% of the human genome, and that roughly 100 copies in the youngest L1HS subfamily remain retrotransposition-competent. It describes intact L1 elements separately, but does not explicitly say that the counted copies are full-length and lack function-affecting mutations, or give a count of 100–150 for copies meeting those criteria. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 99 · Cited by 154

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Han, K., Lee, J., Meyer, T.J., Remedios, P., Goodwin, L., and Batzer, M.A. (2008). L1 recombinationassociated deletions generate human genomic variation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.a. 105 , 1936619371.

Authors
Sultana, T., van Essen, D., Siol, O., Bailly-Bechet, M., Philippe, C., Zine El Aabidine, A., Pioger, L., Nigumann, P., Saccani, S., Andrau, J.-C., Gilbert, N., & Cristofari, G.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
Molecular Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
74
Issue
3
Pages
555-570.e7
ISSN
1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2928206577
Cited by
154
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13
FWCI
15.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Cell (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Canceropôle PACA
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  • Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency
  • Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche
  • European Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
Keywords
LINE-1 retrotransposons, retrotransposition, transposable elements, integration site mapping, sequence bias, chromatin state, DNA replication timing, DNA replication, natural selection, human genome, mobile genetic elements
MeSH terms
Chromosome Mapping, DNA Transposable Elements, DNA Replication, HeLa Cells, Humans, Genome, Human, Retroelements, Long Interspersed Nucleotide Elements, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review