Cited by 213Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

CoBATCH for High-Throughput Single-Cell Epigenomic Profiling

Open access
Wang, Qianhao, Xiong, Haiqing, Ai, Shanshan, Yu, Xianhong, Liu, Yaxi, Zhang, Jiejie, He, Aibin·2019·Molecular Cell

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

An efficient, generalizable method for genome-wide mapping of single-cell histone modifications or chromatin-binding proteins is lacking. Here, we develop CoBATCH, combinatorial barcoding and targeted chromatin release, for single-cell profiling of genomic distribution of chromatin-binding proteins in cell culture and tissue. Protein A in fusion to Tn5 transposase is enriched through specific antibodies to genomic regions, and Tn5 generates indexed chromatin fragments ready for library preparation and sequencing. Importantly, this strategy enables not only low-input epigenomic profiling in intact tissues but also measures scalable up to tens of thousands of single cells per experiment under both native and cross-linked conditions. CoBATCH produces ∼12,000 reads/cell with extremely low background. Mapping of endothelial cell lineages from ten embryonic mouse organs through CoBATCH allows for efficient deciphering of epigenetic heterogeneity of cell populations and cis-regulatory mechanisms. Thus, obviating specialized devices, CoBATCH is broadly applicable and easily deployable for single-cell profiling of protein-DNA interactions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.07.015

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 71 · Cited by 213

Authors
Wang, Q., Xiong, H., Ai, S., Yu, X., Liu, Y., Zhang, J., & He, A.
Affiliations
Peking University (CN)
Corresponding author
He, Aibin
Venue
Molecular Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
76
Issue
1
Pages
206-216.e7
ISSN
1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2971336800
Cited by
213
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 4
FWCI
9.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Cell (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China Stem Cell and Translational Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
single-cell epigenomics, chromatin-binding proteins, histone modifications, combinatorial barcoding, Tn5 transposase, protein A, chromatin release, protein-DNA interactions, low-input sequencing, epigenetic heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells, Epigenome, Acetylation, Animals, Cell Line, Chromatin, Histones, Methylation, Mice, Transgenic, Protein Binding, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Mice, Epigenomics, Single-Cell Analysis, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review