Cited by 232Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsRNA Research and SplicingGene Regulatory Network Analysis

Transcription activation is enhanced by multivalent interactions independent of phase separation

Open access
Trojanowski, Jorge, Frank, Lukas, Rademacher, Anne, Mücke, Norbert, Grigaitis, Pranas, Rippe, Karsten·2022·Molecular Cell

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Transcription factors (TFs) consist of a DNA-binding domain and an activation domain (AD) that are frequently considered to be independent and exchangeable modules. However, recent studies report that the physicochemical properties of the AD can control TF assembly at chromatin by driving phase separation into transcriptional condensates. Here, we dissected transcription activation by comparing different synthetic TFs at a reporter gene array with real-time single-cell fluorescence microscopy. In these experiments, binding site occupancy, residence time, and coactivator recruitment in relation to multivalent TF interactions were compared. While phase separation propensity and activation strength of the AD were linked, the actual formation of liquid-like TF droplets had a neutral or inhibitory effect on transcription activation. We conclude that multivalent AD-mediated interactions enhance the transcription activation capacity of a TF by increasing its residence time in the chromatin-bound state and facilitating the recruitment of coactivators independent of phase separation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.04.017

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current theories propose liquid-liquid phase separation and some form of transcription factor trapping or engagement of transcription factors in multivalent interactions independent of assembly into phase-separated liquid-like droplets.

    “current theories propose liquid-liquid phase separation18,64–66 and some form of TF trapping22,67 or engagement of TFs in multivalent interactions independent of assembly into phase-separated liquid-like droplets.68”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [1]1. Banani, S.F. ∙ Lee, H.O. ∙ Hyman, A.A. ... Biomolecular condensates: Organizers of cellular biochemistry Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017; 18:285-298 Crossref Scopus (3254) PubMed Google Scholar
  2. [2]2. Boija, A. ∙ Klein, I.A. ∙ Sabari, B.R. ... Transcription factors activate genes through the phase-separation capacity of their activation domains Cell. 2018; 175:1842-1855.e16 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (1024) PubMed Google Scholar
  3. [3]3. Bracha, D. ∙ Walls, M.T. ∙ Wei, M.T. ... Mapping local and global liquid phase behavior in living cells using photo-oligomerizable seeds Cell. 2018; 175:1467-1480.e13 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (282) PubMed Google Scholar
  4. [4]4. Brent, R. ∙ Ptashne, M. A eukaryotic transcriptional activator bearing the DNA specificity of a prokaryotic repressor Cell. 1985; 43:729-736

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trojanowski, J., Frank, L., Rademacher, A., Mücke, N., Grigaitis, P., & Rippe, K.
Affiliations
German Cancer Research Center (DE)
Corresponding author
Rippe, Karsten
Venue
Molecular Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-05
Volume
82
Issue
10
Pages
1878-1893.e10
ISSN
1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4229375645
Cited by
232
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 10
FWCI
15.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg (INST 35/1314-1 FUGG, INST 35/1503-1 FUGG)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (RI1283/16-1)
  • Universität Heidelberg
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
transcriptional activation, multivalent interactions, phase separation, transcriptional condensates, coactivator recruitment, chromatin binding, binding site occupancy, residence time, synthetic transcription factors, liquid-like droplets
MeSH terms
Protein Domains, Binding Sites, Chromatin, Transcription Factors, Transcriptional Activation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review