Cited by 57MicroRNA in disease regulationRNA Research and SplicingRNA regulation and disease

Structural basis of microRNA biogenesis by Dicer-1 and its partner protein Loqs-PB

Open access
Jouravleva, Karina, Golovenko, Dmitrij, Demo, Gabriel, Dutcher, Robert C., Hall, Traci M. Tanaka, Zamore, Phillip D., Korostelev, Andrei A.·2022·Molecular Cell

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

In animals and plants, Dicer enzymes collaborate with double-stranded RNA-binding domain (dsRBD) proteins to convert precursor-microRNAs (pre-miRNAs) into miRNA duplexes. We report six cryo-EM structures of Drosophila Dicer-1 that show how Dicer-1 and its partner Loqs‑PB cooperate (1) before binding pre-miRNA, (2) after binding and in a catalytically competent state, (3) after nicking one arm of the pre-miRNA, and (4) following complete dicing and initial product release. Our reconstructions suggest that pre-miRNA binds a rare, open conformation of the Dicer‑1⋅Loqs‑PB heterodimer. The Dicer-1 dsRBD and three Loqs‑PB dsRBDs form a tight belt around the pre-miRNA, distorting the RNA helix to place the scissile phosphodiester bonds in the RNase III active sites. Pre-miRNA cleavage shifts the dsRBDs and partially closes Dicer-1, which may promote product release. Our data suggest a model for how the Dicer‑1⋅Loqs‑PB complex affects a complete cycle of pre-miRNA recognition, stepwise endonuclease cleavage, and product release.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.09.002

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Jouravleva, K., Golovenko, D., Demo, G., Dutcher, R. C., Hall, T. M. T., Zamore, P. D., & Korostelev, A. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Hall, Traci M. Tanaka
  • Zamore, Phillip D.
  • Korostelev, Andrei A.
Venue
Molecular Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-11
Volume
82
Issue
21
Pages
4049-4063.e6
ISSN
1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4298111957
Cited by
57
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 3
FWCI
5.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Charles A. King Trust
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM136275, R35GM127094)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ZIAES050165)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
Keywords
DICER1, microRNA biogenesis, pre-miRNA processing, double-stranded RNA-binding domain, Drosophila, cryo-EM structure, product launch, endonuclease activity
MeSH terms
Animals, Drosophila, RNA-Binding Proteins, Drosophila Proteins, MicroRNAs, Ribonuclease III

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review