The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterization of Tollip protein upon Lipopolysaccharide challenge
Abstract
Tollip protein serves as a suppressor of innate immunity signaling with unknown mechanism. In this report, we observed that Tollip preferentially bound with phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate (PtdIns(3)P) and phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-phosphate (PtdIns(3,4,5)P) in vitro. Mutation of lysine 150 to glutamic acid (Tollip(KE)) within the C2 domain abolished such binding, indicating that C2 domain is critically involved. We demonstrated that overexpression of Tollip inhibited NFkB reporter gene transcription. On the contrary, overexpression of Tollip(KE) mutant has no inhibitory effect on LPS-induced NFkB reporter activity. Tollip binding with 3'-phosphorylated phosphatidylinositides implies that PI3 kinase may regulate its function. We observed that Tollip-mediated inhibition could be alleviated by wortmannin. We also showed that pretreatment with wortmannin augmented LPS-induced endogenous IL-1beta gene expression in monocytic THP-1 cells. THP-1 cells with prolonged LPS treatment develop a state of hyporesponsiveness and no longer respond to further LPS challenge in terms of IL-1beta gene expression. Here we demonstrated that Tollip protein levels were increased following LPS treatment in THP-1 cells as well as in human primary blood mononuclear cells. Increased protein stability upon LPS challenge was likely the cause for the Tollip protein increase. Upon over expression with an enhanced green fluorescent tag, Tollip localized to Golgi apparatus. Our study provides yet another m…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Pathologically, TOLLIP-deficient mice tend to develop more severe atherosclerosis as well as neurological defects [628, 631].”
From Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1 (2021) · cites this paper as [631]
In the citing paper
“TOLLIP-deficient monocytes are defective in lysosome fusion and are programmed into an inflamed state with elevated CCR5 and enhanced expression of chemokines such as CCL2/MCP1 [629, 631].”
From Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1 (2021) · cites this paper as [631]
Citations
Cites
Guha, M., & Mackman, N. (2002) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m203298200 · Cited by 799
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1
Klionsky, D. J., Abdel-Aziz, A. K., Abdelfatah, S., Abdellatif, M., Abdoli, A., Abel, S., Abeliovich, H., Abildgaard, M. H., Abudu, Y. P., Acevedo-Arozena, A., et al. (2021) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2020.1797280 · Cited by 2,897
Self-citationNegative regulation of Toll-like receptor-mediated immune responses
Liew, F. Y., Xu, D., Brint, E. K., & O'Neill, L. A. J. (2005) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1630 · Cited by 1,509
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, T.
- Venue
- Molecular Immunology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-92
- ISSN
- 0161-5890
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review