Cited by 423Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterialsEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies

Nanoadsorbents for pollutants removal: A review

Kyzas, George Z., Matis, Kostas A.·2015·Journal of Molecular Liquids

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molliq.2015.01.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 116 · Cited by 423

Authors
Kyzas, G. Z., & Matis, K. A.
Affiliations
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
Corresponding author
Kyzas, George Z.
Venue
Journal of Molecular Liquids
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
203
Pages
159-168
ISSN
0167-7322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967655398
Cited by
423
References
116
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 8
FWCI
21.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Molecular Liquids (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of National Education and Religious Affairs (SR1-22107/13)
  • State Scholarships Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
Keywords
nanoadsorbents, nanomaterials, adsorption, wastewater treatment, dye removal, heavy metal removal, water remediation, surface area, environmental sustainability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review