Cited by 62Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksComputational Drug Discovery Methods

“Pathway drug cocktail”: targeting Ras signaling based on structural pathways

Open access
Nussinov, Ruth, Tsai, Chung-Jung, Mattos, Carla·2013·Trends in Molecular Medicine

Abstract

Tumors bearing Ras mutations are notoriously difficult to treat. Drug combinations targeting the Ras protein or its pathway have also not met with success. 'Pathway drug cocktails', which are combinations aiming at parallel pathways, appear more promising; however, to be usefully exploited, a repertoire of classified pathway combinations is desirable. This challenge would be facilitated by the availability of the structural network of signaling pathways. When integrated with functional and systems level clinical data, they can be powerful in advancing novel therapeutic platforms. Based on structural knowledge, drug cocktails may tear into multiple cellular processes that drive tumorigenesis, and help in deciphering the interrelationship between Ras mutations and the rewired Ras network. The pathway drug cocktail paradigm can be applied to other signaling protein targets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molmed.2013.07.009

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • K-Ras protein has a relatively smooth surface with few well-characterized hydrophobic pockets where compounds could bind.

    “First, K-Ras protein has a relatively smooth surface, with few well-characterized hydrophobic pockets where compounds could bind.41,44”

    From Overcoming Resistance to Drugs Targeting KRAS Mutation (2020) · cites this paper as [44]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 72 · Cited by 62

Authors
Nussinov, R., Tsai, C.-J., & Mattos, C.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • National Cancer Institute (US)
  • Northeastern University (US)
Corresponding author
Nussinov, Ruth
Venue
Trends in Molecular Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-11
Volume
19
Issue
11
Pages
695-704
ISSN
1471-4914 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058481347
Cited by
62
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Molecular Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. Public Health Service (HHSN261200800001E)
  • National Cancer Institute (R56CA096867)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
Ras signaling, drug combination therapy, RAS mutations, cancer therapy, carcinogenesis
MeSH terms
Animals, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Drug Therapy, Combination, Humans, Neoplasms, Signal Transduction, ras Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review