Cited by 90Gut microbiota and healthEpigenetics and DNA MethylationGenetic factors in colorectal cancer

Microbiota impact on the epigenetic regulation of colorectal cancer

Open access
Yang, Tao, Owen, Jennifer L., Lightfoot, Yaíma L., Kladde, Michael P., Mohamadzadeh, Mansour·2013·Trends in Molecular Medicine

Abstract

Mechanisms of colorectal cancer (CRC) development can be generally divided into three categories: genetic, epigenetic, and aberrant immunologic signaling pathways, all of which may be triggered by an imbalanced intestinal microbiota. Aberrant gut microbial composition, termed 'dysbiosis', has been reported in inflammatory bowel disease patients who are at increased risk for CRC development. Recent studies indicate that it is feasible to rescue experimental models of colonic cancer by oral treatment with genetically engineered beneficial bacteria and/or their immune-regulating gene products. Here, we review the mechanisms of epigenetic modulation implicated in the development and progression of CRC, which may be the result of dysbiosis, and therefore may be amenable to therapeutic intervention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molmed.2013.08.005

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 119 · Cited by 90

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [26]Sekirov I Gut microbiota in health and disease. Physiol Rev 2010 90 859 904 20664075
  2. [111]Khazaie K Abating colon cancer polyposis by Lactobacillus acidophilus deficient in lipoteichoic acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012 109 10462 10467 22689992 PMC3387103

Authors
Yang, T., Owen, J. L., Lightfoot, Y. L., Kladde, M. P., & Mohamadzadeh, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Mohamadzadeh, Mansour
Venue
Trends in Molecular Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
19
Issue
12
Pages
714-725
ISSN
1471-4914 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045494646
Cited by
90
References
119
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 4
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Molecular Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (CA111002, L30 CA111002)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (1R01AI098833-01, R01AI093370)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR029890)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Keywords
colorectal cancer, gut microbiota, dysbiosis, epigenetic regulation, inflammatory bowel disease, probiotics, immune regulation, tumor progression
MeSH terms
Animals, Bacteria, Humans, Colorectal Neoplasms, Gastrointestinal Tract, Epigenesis, Genetic, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review