Cited by 80Carcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentDNA Repair MechanismsEffects of Radiation Exposure

Do cytotoxicity and cell death cause false positive results in the in vitro comet assay?

Open access
Azqueta, Amaya, Stopper, Helga, Zegura, Bojana, Dusinska, Maria, Møller, Peter·2022·Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis

Abstract

The comet assay is used to measure DNA damage induced by chemical and physical agents. High concentrations of test agents may cause cytotoxicity or cell death, which may give rise to false positive results in the comet assay. Systematic studies on genotoxins and cytotoxins (i.e. non-genotoxic poisons) have attempted to establish a threshold of cytotoxicity or cell death by which DNA damage results measured by the comet assay could be regarded as a false positive result. Thresholds of cytotoxicity/cell death range from 20% to 50% in various publications. Curiously, a survey of the latest literature on comet assay results from cell culture studies suggests that one-third of publications did not assess cytotoxicity or cell death. We recommend that it should be mandatory to include results from at least one type of assay on cytotoxicity, cell death or cell proliferation in publications on comet assay results. A combination of cytotoxicity (or cell death) and proliferation (or colony forming efficiency assay) is preferable in actively proliferating cells because it covers more mechanisms of action. Applying a general threshold of cytotoxicity/cell death to all types of agents may not be applicable; however, 25% compared to the concurrent negative control seems to be a good starting value to avoid false positive comet assay results. Further research is needed to establish a threshold value to distinguish between true and potentially false positive genotoxic effects detected by the…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2022.503520

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In mutagenicity testing, excessive cytotoxicity or cytostasis may cause misleading positives through oxidative stress, nuclease activation, impaired DNA repair, disturbed cell-cycle progression, chromosomal mis-segregation or selective survival of damaged cells.

    “In mutagenicity testing, excessive cytotoxicity or cytostasis may cause misleading positives through oxidative stress, nuclease activation, impaired DNA repair, disturbed cell-cycle progression, chromosomal mis-segregation or selective survival of damaged cells (OECD, 2012,2016,2023; Fowler et al., 2012; Azqueta et al., 2022).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Azqueta, A., Stopper, H., Zegura, B., Dusinska, M., & Møller, P.
Affiliations
  • Navarre Institute of Health Research (ES)
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Azqueta, Amaya
Venue
Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-09
Volume
881
Pages
503520
ISSN
1383-5718 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283382418
Cited by
80
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6
FWCI
6.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DiRROS repository (University of Maribor) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Deposito Adademico Digital Universidad De Navarra (University of Navarra) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS (P1-0245)
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (PID2020, PID2020-115348RB-I00)
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (P1-0245, 857381, 952404, 814425)
  • European Regional Development Fund (H2020)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
Keywords
comet assay, false positives, cytotoxicity, cell death, genotoxicity testing, genotoxins, cytotoxin, cell proliferation, DNA damage
MeSH terms
Cause of Death, DNA Damage, Mutagens, Cell Death, Comet Assay

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review