Do cytotoxicity and cell death cause false positive results in the in vitro comet assay?
Open accessAbstract
The comet assay is used to measure DNA damage induced by chemical and physical agents. High concentrations of test agents may cause cytotoxicity or cell death, which may give rise to false positive results in the comet assay. Systematic studies on genotoxins and cytotoxins (i.e. non-genotoxic poisons) have attempted to establish a threshold of cytotoxicity or cell death by which DNA damage results measured by the comet assay could be regarded as a false positive result. Thresholds of cytotoxicity/cell death range from 20% to 50% in various publications. Curiously, a survey of the latest literature on comet assay results from cell culture studies suggests that one-third of publications did not assess cytotoxicity or cell death. We recommend that it should be mandatory to include results from at least one type of assay on cytotoxicity, cell death or cell proliferation in publications on comet assay results. A combination of cytotoxicity (or cell death) and proliferation (or colony forming efficiency assay) is preferable in actively proliferating cells because it covers more mechanisms of action. Applying a general threshold of cytotoxicity/cell death to all types of agents may not be applicable; however, 25% compared to the concurrent negative control seems to be a good starting value to avoid false positive comet assay results. Further research is needed to establish a threshold value to distinguish between true and potentially false positive genotoxic effects detected by the…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In mutagenicity testing, excessive cytotoxicity or cytostasis may cause misleading positives through oxidative stress, nuclease activation, impaired DNA repair, disturbed cell-cycle progression, chromosomal mis-segregation or selective survival of damaged cells.
“In mutagenicity testing, excessive cytotoxicity or cytostasis may cause misleading positives through oxidative stress, nuclease activation, impaired DNA repair, disturbed cell-cycle progression, chromosomal mis-segregation or selective survival of damaged cells (OECD, 2012,2016,2023; Fowler et al., 2012; Azqueta et al., 2022).”
From Cytotoxicity across OECD methods is not a single endpoint: context-dependent roles, variability and implications for decision-making (2026) · cites this paper as Azqueta et al., 2022
Cites
Molecular mechanisms of necroptosis: an ordered cellular explosion
Vandenabeele, P., Galluzzi, L., Vanden Berghe, T., & Kroemer, G. (2010) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2970 · Cited by 2,382 · see citing works
Rabinowitz, J. D., & White, E. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1193497 · Cited by 1,982 · see citing works
Tang, H. L., Tang, H. M., Mak, K. H., Hu, S., Wang, S. S., Wong, K. M., Wong, C. S. T., Wu, H. Y., Law, H. T., Liu, K., et al. (2012) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e11-11-0926 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mayilswami, S., Raval, N. P., Tomar, R., Sharma, S., Praveena, S. M., Kataria, N., Selvasembian, R., Shanmugam, S. R., Nath, R., Malakar, A., et al. (2025) · Environmental Science: Advances · doi:10.1039/d4va00405a · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Thoma, T., Löhr, L., Demuth, P., Hambruch, N., Oesch, F., & Landsiedel, R. (2026) · NAM Journal · doi:10.1016/j.namjnl.2026.100126
- Authors
- Azqueta, A., Stopper, H., Zegura, B., Dusinska, M., & Møller, P.
- Affiliations
- Navarre Institute of Health Research (ES)
- University of Würzburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Azqueta, Amaya
- Venue
- Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-09
- Volume
- 881
- Pages
- 503520
- ISSN
- 1383-5718 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4283382418
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6
- FWCI
- 6.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DiRROS repository (University of Maribor) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Deposito Adademico Digital Universidad De Navarra (University of Navarra) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS (P1-0245)
- Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (PID2020, PID2020-115348RB-I00)
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (P1-0245, 857381, 952404, 814425)
- European Regional Development Fund (H2020)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
- Keywords
- comet assay, false positives, cytotoxicity, cell death, genotoxicity testing, genotoxins, cytotoxin, cell proliferation, DNA damage
- MeSH terms
- Cause of Death, DNA Damage, Mutagens, Cell Death, Comet Assay
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review