The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Radiomics: the process and the challenges
Open accessAbstract
"Radiomics" refers to the extraction and analysis of large amounts of advanced quantitative imaging features with high throughput from medical images obtained with computed tomography, positron emission tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Importantly, these data are designed to be extracted from standard-of-care images, leading to a very large potential subject pool. Radiomics data are in a mineable form that can be used to build descriptive and predictive models relating image features to phenotypes or gene-protein signatures. The core hypothesis of radiomics is that these models, which can include biological or medical data, can provide valuable diagnostic, prognostic or predictive information. The radiomics enterprise can be divided into distinct processes, each with its own challenges that need to be overcome: (a) image acquisition and reconstruction, (b) image segmentation and rendering, (c) feature extraction and feature qualification and (d) databases and data sharing for eventual (e) ad hoc informatics analyses. Each of these individual processes poses unique challenges. For example, optimum protocols for image acquisition and reconstruction have to be identified and harmonized. Also, segmentations have to be robust and involve minimal operator input. Features have to be generated that robustly reflect the complexity of the individual volumes, but cannot be overly complex or redundant. Furthermore, informatics databases that allow incorporation of image features and image annotations, along with medical and genetic data, have to be generated. Finally, the statistical approaches to analyze these data have to be optimized, as radiomics is not a mature field of study. Each of these processes will be discussed in turn, as well as some of their unique challenges and proposed approaches to solve them. The focus of this article will be on images of non-small-cell lung cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The first such study used 182 texture features in combination with 22 semantic features to describe CT images of lung cancer (24).”
From Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data (2016) · cites this paper as [24]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482 · cited 1×
“This multiple testing problem has been addressed in statistics in many ways; however, the most familiar, and conservative, Bonferroni corrections severely limit the power of the test in the 50,000-test experiments [81].”
BackgroundTextural Features for Image Classification
Haralick, R. M., Shanmugam, K., & Dinstein, I. (1973) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1973.4309314 · Cited by 22,886 · cited 1×
“Second-order statistics or co-occurrence matrix features can be used for texture classification [64–66] and are widely applied in medical pattern recognition tasks [67–71].”
MethodBootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife
Efron, B. (1979) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344552 · Cited by 17,602
Jolliffe, I. T. (2005) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0470013192.bsa501 · Cited by 14,522
Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: Algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations
Osher, S., & Sethian, J. A. (1988) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/0021-9991(88)90002-2 · Cited by 14,196 · cited 1×
“The level set method was initially proposed by Osher and Sethian in 1988 to track moving interfaces, and it was subsequently applied across various imaging applications in the late 1990s [38].”
MethodGolub, T. R., Slonim, D. K., Tamayo, P., Huard, C., Gaasenbeek, M., Mesirov, J. P., Coller, H., Loh, M. L., Downing, J. R., Caligiuri, M. A., et al. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.531 · Cited by 11,516 · cited 1×
“The field of high-dimensional biomarker discovery and validation has evolved rapidly over the past decade since some of the earliest microarray-based results were reported [80].”
BackgroundIn silico prediction of protein-protein interactions in human macrophages
Souiai, O., Guerfali, F. Z., Miled, S. B., Brun, C., & Benkahla, A. (2014) · BMC Research Notes · doi:10.1186/1756-0500-7-157 · Cited by 10,785
Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response
Tusher, V. G., Tibshirani, R., & Chu, G. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.091062498 · Cited by 10,568
Fundamentals of digital image processing
Jain, A. K. (1988) · Cited by 7,000
Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts
Boykov, Y., Veksler, O., & Zabih, R. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.969114 · Cited by 6,988
Chiang, L. H., Russell, E. L., & Braatz, R. D. (2001) · Advanced textbooks in control and signal processing · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-0347-9_4 · Cited by 6,684
Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis
Lambin, P., Rios-Velazquez, E., Leijenaar, R., Carvalho, S., van Stiphout, R. G. P. M., Granton, P., Zegers, C. M. L., Gillies, R., Boellard, R., Dekker, A., et al. (2012) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2011.11.036 · Cited by 6,084 · cited 1×
“010 , , mineable databases from radiological images [1].”
BackgroundSelf-citationFundamentals of digital image processing
(1989) · Computer Vision Graphics and Image Processing · doi:10.1016/0734-189x(89)90041-8 · Cited by 4,703
Sethian, J. A. (1999) · Cited by 3,608
Shape modeling with front propagation: a level set approach
Malladi, R., Sethian, J. A., & Vemuri, B. C. (1995) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.368173 · Cited by 3,166 · cited 1×
“Many popular segmentation algorithms have been applied in medical imaging studies within the last 20 years; the most popular ones include region-growing methods [31,32], level set methods [33–38], graph cut methods [39–44], active contours (snake) algorithms [45–49] and semiautomatic segmentations such as livewires [5…”
MethodArmato, S. G., McLennan, G., Bidaut, L., McNitt‐Gray, M. F., Meyer, C. R., Reeves, A. P., Zhao, B., Aberle, D. R., Henschke, C. I., Hoffman, E. A., et al. (2011) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.3528204 · Cited by 2,887 · cited 1×
“Currently available clinical image data which may be used for radiomics study includes the Lung Image Database Consortium, the Reference Image Database to Evaluate Response to therapy in lung cancer and others [27,28].”
MethodWold, S., Ruhe, A., Wold, H., & Dunn, III (1984) · SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing · doi:10.1137/0905052 · Cited by 2,529 · cited 1×
“Multivariate data analysis tools such as PCA [89] and partial least squares projection to latent structures [90] (PLS) can be used to analyze quantitative features together with additional data.”
MethodEstimating the error rate of a prediction rule: improvement on cross-validation
Efron, B. (1983) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1983.10477973 · Cited by 2,300 · cited 1×
“have pioneered the work, studied various cross-validation methods and proposed unbiased error estimation called the bootstrap [93,94].”
MethodThe positive false discovery rate: a Bayesian interpretation and the q-value
Storey, J. D. (2003) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1074290335 · Cited by 2,204 · cited 1×
“False discovery rates [82–84] have been developed to provide more reasonable error estimates.”
MethodFeature selection: evaluation, application, and small sample performance
Jain, A. K., & Zongker, D. E. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.574797 · Cited by 2,186 · cited 1×
“Different feature selection methods can be used for this purpose and may exploit machine learning or statistical approaches [72–76].”
MethodTexture analysis using gray level run lengths
Galloway, M. M. (1975) · Computer Graphics and Image Processing · doi:10.1016/s0146-664x(75)80008-6 · Cited by 2,168 · cited 2×
“Furthermore, gray level run length features, derived from run length matrices and using run length metrics as proposed by Galloway [66], can be extracted.”
MethodWarfield, S. K., Zou, K. H., & Wells, W. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2004.828354 · Cited by 2,072 · cited 1×
“Many metrics have been used, like volume, center of volume and maximum surface distance, to compare characteristics like robustness and accuracy [57,58].”
MethodDiffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Cancer Biomarker: Consensus and Recommendations
Padhani, A. R., Liu, G., Koh, D., Chenevert, T. L., Thoeny, H. C., Takahara, T., Dzik-Jurasz, A. S. K., Ross, B. D., CAUTEREN, M. V., Collins, D., et al. (2009) · Neoplasia · doi:10.1593/neo.81328 · Cited by 1,992 · cited 1×
“DWI has been proposed as a cancer imaging biomarker, and there are efforts to develop quality control protocols [18,19].”
BackgroundIdentifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures
Reiner, A., Yekutieli, D., & Benjamini, Y. (2003) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btf877 · Cited by 1,765 · cited 1×
“False discovery rates [82–84] have been developed to provide more reasonable error estimates.”
MethodFDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0
Boellaard, R., O’Doherty, M. J., Weber, W., Mottaghy, F. M., Lonsdale, M. N., Stroobants, S. G., Oyen, W. J. G., Kotzerke, J., Hoekstra, O. S., Pruim, J., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-009-1297-4 · Cited by 1,329 · cited 2×
“Before a scanner is used in a quantitative manner, interinstitution cross-calibration and quality control such as proposed recently [14] are necessary (Fig.”
MethodMorphometric analysis of white matter lesions in MR images: method and validation
Zijdenbos, A. P., Dawant, B. M., Margolin, R. A., & Palmer, A. C. (1994) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.363096 · Cited by 1,268 · cited 1×
“The Jaccard Similarity Index (SI) is the measure of the overlap of two or more volumes and is calculated as the ratio of voxel-wise intersection to union of target and reference images [59]:”
BackgroundTexture analysis of SAR sea ice imagery using gray level co-occurrence matrices
Soh, L.-K., & Tsatsoulis, C. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/36.752194 · Cited by 1,238 · cited 1×
“Second-order statistics or co-occurrence matrix features can be used for texture classification [64–66] and are widely applied in medical pattern recognition tasks [67–71].”
MethodShedden, K., Taylor, J. M. G., Misek, D. E., Chang, A. C., Hanash, S., Kuick, R. D., Beer, D. G., Enkemann, S. A., Yeatman, T. J., Eschrich, S. A., et al. (2008) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.1790 · Cited by 1,176
Self-citationUse of Archived Specimens in Evaluation of Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers
Simon, R. M., Paik, S., & Hayes, D. F. (2009) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djp335 · Cited by 1,040 · cited 1×
“Following the best practices in developing and then independently validating the observations in a distinct cohort is essential for reproducible results [92].”
MethodTexture analysis of medical images
Castellano, G., Bonilha, L., Li, L. M., & Cendes, F. (2004) · Clinical Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.crad.2004.07.008 · Cited by 1,030
The History of the Cluster Heat Map
Wilkinson, L., & Friendly, M. L. (2009) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1198/tas.2009.0033 · Cited by 979 · cited 1×
“This cluster heat map is a synthesis of various graphic displays developed by statisticians over more than a century [86].”
BackgroundStandards for PET Image Acquisition and Quantitative Data Analysis
Boellaard, R. (2009) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.108.057182 · Cited by 906 · cited 1×
“PET–CT Quantitative imaging with 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose (18-FDG) PET scans is a challenge because it not only requires calibration of the scanner and standardization of the scan protocol but also requires the patient and staff to adhere to a strict patient protocol [14,15].”
MethodDupuy, A., & Simon, R. (2007) · Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djk018 · Cited by 658 · cited 1×
“[91], many genomics-based studies that have been published contain significant analytical errors.”
BackgroundTexture information in run-length matrices
Tang, X. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/83.725367 · Cited by 655 · cited 1×
“Second-order statistics or co-occurrence matrix features can be used for texture classification [64–66] and are widely applied in medical pattern recognition tasks [67–71].”
MethodDecoding global gene expression programs in liver cancer by noninvasive imaging
Segal, E., Sirlin, C. B., Ooi, C., Adler, A. S., Gollub, J., Chen, X., Chan, B. K., Matcuk, G. R., Barry, C. T., Chang, H. Y., et al. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1306 · Cited by 629 · cited 1×
“Following a complete manual extraction of numerous (N100) image features, a subset of 14 features was able to predict 80% of the gene expression pattern in hepatocellular carcinoma using computed tomographic (CT) images [12].”
MethodRegion growing: a new approach
Hojjatoleslami, S. A., & Kittler, J. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/83.701170 · Cited by 560 · cited 1×
“Many popular segmentation algorithms have been applied in medical imaging studies within the last 20 years; the most popular ones include region-growing methods [31,32], level set methods [33–38], graph cut methods [39–44], active contours (snake) algorithms [45–49] and semiautomatic segmentations such as livewires [5…”
MethodInteractive Segmentation with Intelligent Scissors
Mortensen, E. N., & Barrett, W. A. (1998) · Graphical Models and Image Processing · doi:10.1006/gmip.1998.0480 · Cited by 547 · cited 1×
“Many popular segmentation algorithms have been applied in medical imaging studies within the last 20 years; the most popular ones include region-growing methods [31,32], level set methods [33–38], graph cut methods [39–44], active contours (snake) algorithms [45–49] and semiautomatic segmentations such as livewires [5…”
MethodExploring feature-based approaches in PET images for predicting cancer treatment outcomes
Naqa, I. E., Grigsby, P. W., Apte, A., Kidd, E. A., Donnelly, E. D., Khullar, D., Chaudhari, S. R., Yang, D., Schmitt, M., Laforest, R. A., et al. (2008) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2008.08.011 · Cited by 480 · cited 1×
“, mean, median, min, max, range, skewness, kurtosis), but also more complex values, such as metabolic volume above an absolute SUV of 5 or the fraction of highdensity tissue measured with CT [60,61].”
BackgroundIdentification of noninvasive imaging surrogates for brain tumor gene-expression modules
Diehn, M., Nardini, C., Wang, D. S., McGovern, S., Jayaraman, M., Liang, Y., Aldape, K., Cha, S., & Kuo, M. D. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0801279105 · Cited by 440 · cited 1×
“A similar extraction of features from contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images (MRI) of glioblastoma was able to predict immunohistochemically identified protein expression patterns [13].”
BackgroundWang, L., Li, C., Sun, Q., Xia, D., & Kao, C.-Y. (2009) · Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2009.04.010 · Cited by 405 · cited 1×
“Many popular segmentation algorithms have been applied in medical imaging studies within the last 20 years; the most popular ones include region-growing methods [31,32], level set methods [33–38], graph cut methods [39–44], active contours (snake) algorithms [45–49] and semiautomatic segmentations such as livewires [5…”
MethodFeature Selection Using Principal Component Analysis
Song, F., Guo, Z., & Mei, D. (2010) · International Conference on System science, Engineering design and Manufacturing informatization · doi:10.1109/icsem.2010.14 · Cited by 392 · cited 5×
“Dimensionality reduction can also be achieved by combining or transforming the original features to obtain a new set of features by using methods like principal component analysis (PCA) [73].”
MethodInfluentialMolecular Staging for Survival Prediction of Colorectal Cancer Patients
Eschrich, S. A., Yang, I. V., Bloom, G., Kwong, K. Y., Boulware, D. C., Cantor, A. B., Coppola, D., Kruhøffer, M., Aaltonen, L. A., Orntoft, T. F., et al. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.00.695 · Cited by 344 · cited 1×
“Approaches we have used include neural networks [87], linear regression [87] and Cox proportional hazards regression [88].”
MethodSelf-citationGalbraith, S. M., Lodge, M. A., Taylor, N. J., Rustin, G. J. S., Bentzen, S. M., Stirling, J., & Padhani, A. R. (2002) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.731 · Cited by 338 · cited 1×
“Results of the DCE MRI depend on the contrast agent dose, method of administration, pulse sequence used, field strength of the scanner and the analysis method used [20–22].”
MethodMeasures of Response: RECIST, WHO, and New Alternatives
Jaffe, C. C. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.06.5599 · Cited by 302 · cited 1×
“[RECIST]) or two-dimensional (2D) (World Health Organization) long-axis measures [2].”
Jackson, A., O’Connor, J. P. B., Parker, G. J. M., & Jayson, G. C. (2007) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-0238 · Cited by 296
Textural analysis of contrast‐enhanced MR images of the breast
Gibbs, P., & Turnbull, L. W. (2003) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.10496 · Cited by 287 · cited 1×
“In focused studies, texture features have been shown to provide significantly higher prognostic power than ROI-based methods [8–11].”
BackgroundSegmentation of Pulmonary Nodules in Thoracic CT Scans: A Region Growing Approach
Dehmeshki, J., Amin, H., Valdivieso, M., & Ye, X. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2007.907555 · Cited by 278 · cited 1×
“Many popular segmentation algorithms have been applied in medical imaging studies within the last 20 years; the most popular ones include region-growing methods [31,32], level set methods [33–38], graph cut methods [39–44], active contours (snake) algorithms [45–49] and semiautomatic segmentations such as livewires [5…”
MethodObject segmentation using graph cuts based active contours
Xu, N., Ahuja, N., & Bansal, R. (2007) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2006.11.004 · Cited by 219
Individual tooth segmentation from CT images using level set method with shape and intensity prior
Gao, H., & Chae, O. (2010) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2010.01.010 · Cited by 173 · cited 1×
“Many popular segmentation algorithms have been applied in medical imaging studies within the last 20 years; the most popular ones include region-growing methods [31,32], level set methods [33–38], graph cut methods [39–44], active contours (snake) algorithms [45–49] and semiautomatic segmentations such as livewires [5…”
MethodSmall sample issues for microarray‐based classification
Dougherty, E. R. (2001) · Comparative and Functional Genomics · doi:10.1002/cfg.62 · Cited by 159 · cited 1×
“Inference in small samples has seen renewed interest with the advent of genomics technologies, especially in classification [95].”
BackgroundCreating and Curating a Terminology for Radiology: Ontology Modeling and Analysis
Rubin, D. L. (2007) · Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10278-007-9073-0 · Cited by 154 · cited 1×
“There are efforts to develop a standardized lexicon for the description of such lesions [4,5] and to include these descriptors via annotated image markup into quantitative, mineable data [6,7].”
BackgroundImplementing Personalized Medicine in a Cancer Center
Fenstermacher, D., Wenham, R., Rollison, D., & Dalton, W. (2011) · Cancer Journal · doi:10.1097/ppo.0b013e318238216e · Cited by 148 · cited 1×
“Therefore, a new data warehouse model that incorporates the metadata layer into the data model, including a comprehensive data dictionary along with calculated data quality attributes such as completeness, accuracy and consistency, has been utilized for the radiomics project [79].”
MethodSelf-citationA review of methods of analysis in contouring studies for radiation oncology
Jameson, M., Holloway, L. C., Vial, P., Vinod, S. K., & Metcalfe, P. E. (2010) · Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1111/j.1754-9485.2010.02192.x · Cited by 143 · cited 1×
“Many metrics have been used, like volume, center of volume and maximum surface distance, to compare characteristics like robustness and accuracy [57,58].”
MethodQuantifying spatial heterogeneity in dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI parameter maps
Rose, C. J., Mills, S. J., O'Connor, J. P. B., Buonaccorsi, G. A., Roberts, C., Watson, Y., Cheung, S., Zhao, S., Whitcher, B., Jackson, A., et al. (2009) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.22003 · Cited by 125 · cited 1×
“It has been observed that enhancement in individual tumors can be heterogeneous and that analysis of this heterogeneity has prognostic value [9].”
BackgroundImage segmentation feature selection and pattern classification for mammographic microcalcifications
Fu, J., Lee, S. K., Wong, S. T. C., Yeh, J., Wang, A., & Wu, H. (2005) · Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2005.03.002 · Cited by 124 · cited 1×
“Different feature selection methods can be used for this purpose and may exploit machine learning or statistical approaches [72–76].”
MethodYang, X., & Knopp, M. V. (2011) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2011/732848 · Cited by 123 · cited 1×
“Results of the DCE MRI depend on the contrast agent dose, method of administration, pulse sequence used, field strength of the scanner and the analysis method used [20–22].”
MethodSuzuki, K., Kohlbrenner, R. M., Epstein, M. L., Obajuluwa, A. M., Xu, J., & Hori, M. (2010) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.3395579 · Cited by 117 · cited 1×
“Many popular segmentation algorithms have been applied in medical imaging studies within the last 20 years; the most popular ones include region-growing methods [31,32], level set methods [33–38], graph cut methods [39–44], active contours (snake) algorithms [45–49] and semiautomatic segmentations such as livewires [5…”
MethodGraph cuts segmentation using an elliptical shape prior
Slabaugh, G., & Ünal, G. (2005) · Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icip.2005.1530282 · Cited by 115 · cited 1×
“Many popular segmentation algorithms have been applied in medical imaging studies within the last 20 years; the most popular ones include region-growing methods [31,32], level set methods [33–38], graph cut methods [39–44], active contours (snake) algorithms [45–49] and semiautomatic segmentations such as livewires [5…”
MethodTai, P., Dyk, J. V., Yu, E., Battista, J. J., Stitt, L., & Coad, T. (1998) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00216-8 · Cited by 111 · cited 1×
“In the majority of cases, manual segmentation tends to overestimate the lesion volume to ensure the entire lesion is identified [54], and the process is highly variable [55,56].”
BackgroundFeasibility of Pathology-Correlated Lung Imaging for Accurate Target Definition of Lung Tumors
Stroom, J. C., Blaauwgeers, H., van Baardwijk, A. A. W., Boersma, L. J., Lebesque, J. V., Theuws, J. C. M., van Suylen, R. J., Klomp, H. M., Liesker, K. R., van Pel, R., et al. (2007) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.04.065 · Cited by 97 · cited 1×
“Manually traced segmentations are often used as gold standard or ground truth [30] against which the accuracy of the automatic segmentation is evaluated.”
MethodImage Data Sharing for Biomedical Research—Meeting HIPAA Requirements for De-identification
Freymann, J., Kirby, J., Perry, J. H., Clunie, D., & Jaffe, C. C. (2011) · Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10278-011-9422-x · Cited by 95 · cited 2×
“One of the largest online CT image repositories is the National Biomedical Image Archive (NBIA) hosted by the National Cancer Institute.”
MethodMcGrath, D. M., Bradley, D. P., Tessier, J., Lacey, T., Taylor, C., & Parker, G. J. M. (2009) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.21959 · Cited by 93 · cited 1×
“Different investigators use different methods to convert DCE MRI signal intensities to contrast agent concentration [23–25].”
MethodArmato, S. G., Meyer, C., McNitt‐Gray, M. F., McLennan, G., Reeves, A. P., Croft, B. Y., & Clarke, L. (2008) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1038/clpt.2008.161 · Cited by 92 · cited 1×
“Currently available clinical image data which may be used for radiomics study includes the Lung Image Database Consortium, the Reference Image Database to Evaluate Response to therapy in lung cancer and others [27,28].”
MethodIs cross-validation better than resubstitution for ranking genes?
Braga-Neto, U., Hashimoto, R. F., Dougherty, E. R., Nguyen, D. V., & Carroll, R. J. (2004) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg399 · Cited by 91 · cited 1×
“In addition, most popular error estimates has been studied in context of small sample classification [97].”
BackgroundObject segmentation using graph cuts based active contours
Xu, N., Bansal, R., & Ahuja, N. (2005) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2003.1211451 · Cited by 90 · cited 1×
“Many popular segmentation algorithms have been applied in medical imaging studies within the last 20 years; the most popular ones include region-growing methods [31,32], level set methods [33–38], graph cut methods [39–44], active contours (snake) algorithms [45–49] and semiautomatic segmentations such as livewires [5…”
MethodStrong Feature Sets from Small Samples
Kim, S., Dougherty, E. R., Barrera, J., Chen, Y., Bittner, M. L., & Trent, J. M. (2002) · Journal of Computational Biology · doi:10.1089/10665270252833226 · Cited by 89 · cited 1×
“There has been extensive studies to make unbiased inference in small samples, one approach was to create synthetic samples following the distribution of the sample groups and report errors of the newly formed population [96].”
BackgroundMedical Imaging on the Semantic Web: Annotation and Image Markup.
Rubin, D. L., Mongkolwat, P., Kleper, V., Supekar, K., & Channin, D. S. (2008) · Cited by 73
O’Sullivan, F. (2005) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxi010 · Cited by 70 · cited 1×
“Quantitative features describing the geometric shape of a tumor can also be extracted from the 3D surface of the rendered volumes [62].”
BackgroundCooper, J. S., Mukherji, S. K., Toledano, A. Y., Beldon, C., Schmalfuss, I. M., Amdur, R. J., Sailer, S. L., Loevner, L. A., Kousouboris, P., Ang, K. K., et al. (2007) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.10.029 · Cited by 66 · cited 1×
“In the majority of cases, manual segmentation tends to overestimate the lesion volume to ensure the entire lesion is identified [54], and the process is highly variable [55,56].”
BackgroundThe integration of PET-CT scans from different hospitals into radiotherapy treatment planning
Öllers, M., Bosmans, G., van Baardwijk, A. A. W., Dekker, A. L. A. J., Lambin, P., Teule, J., Thimister, W., Rhami, A., & Ruysscher, D. D. (2008) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2007.12.025 · Cited by 65 · cited 1×
“From a technical viewpoint, the main challenges are the dose calibration and the metabolic volume or volume-of-interest (VOI) reconstruction that depends heavily on the scan protocol and source-to-background ratio [16].”
BackgroundSelf-citationDeveloping a quality control protocol for diffusion imaging on a clinical MRI system
Delakis, I., Moore, E., Leach, M. O., & Wilde, J. P. D. (2004) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/49/8/003 · Cited by 65 · cited 1×
“DWI has been proposed as a cancer imaging biomarker, and there are efforts to develop quality control protocols [18,19].”
BackgroundAutomatic Graph Cut Segmentation of Lesions in CT Using Mean Shift Superpixels
Ye, X., Beddoe, G., & Slabaugh, G. (2010) · International Journal of Biomedical Imaging · doi:10.1155/2010/983963 · Cited by 55 · cited 1×
“Many popular segmentation algorithms have been applied in medical imaging studies within the last 20 years; the most popular ones include region-growing methods [31,32], level set methods [33–38], graph cut methods [39–44], active contours (snake) algorithms [45–49] and semiautomatic segmentations such as livewires [5…”
MethodThe Annotation and Image Mark-up Project
Channin, D. S., Mongkolwat, P., Kleper, V., & Rubin, D. L. (2009) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2533090135 · Cited by 55 · cited 1×
“There are efforts to develop a standardized lexicon for the description of such lesions [4,5] and to include these descriptors via annotated image markup into quantitative, mineable data [6,7].”
BackgroundPredicting Radiological Panel Opinions Using a Panel of Machine Learning Classifiers
Zinovev, D., Raicu, D. S., Furst, J. D., & Armato, S. G. (2009) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a2041473 · Cited by 53
Developing a classifier model for lung tumors in CT-scan images
Basu, S., Hall, L., Goldgof, D. B., Gu, Y., Kumar, V., Choi, J. W., Gillies, R. J., & Gatenby, R. A. (2011) · Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/icsmc.2011.6083840 · Cited by 51 · cited 2×
“These selected features can also be used to develop classifier models based on machine learning algorithms to improve the performance [29].”
BackgroundSelf-citationNon-rigid image registration of brain magnetic resonance images using graph-cuts
So, R. W. K., Tang, T. W. H., & Chung, A. C. S. (2011) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2011.04.008 · Cited by 50 · cited 1×
“Many popular segmentation algorithms have been applied in medical imaging studies within the last 20 years; the most popular ones include region-growing methods [31,32], level set methods [33–38], graph cut methods [39–44], active contours (snake) algorithms [45–49] and semiautomatic segmentations such as livewires [5…”
MethodPriest, A. N., Gill, A. B., Kataoka, M., McLean, M. A., Joubert, I., Graves, M. J., Griffiths, J. R., Crawford, R., Earl, H. M., Brenton, J. D., et al. (2010) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.22291 · Cited by 49 · cited 1×
“Different investigators use different methods to convert DCE MRI signal intensities to contrast agent concentration [23–25].”
MethodTexture feature extraction using gray level gradient based co-occurence matrices
Lam, S. W.-C. (2002) · Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/icsmc.1996.569778 · Cited by 47
A level set method based on the Bayesian risk for medical image segmentation
Chen, Y.-T. (2010) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2010.05.027 · Cited by 43 · cited 1×
“Many popular segmentation algorithms have been applied in medical imaging studies within the last 20 years; the most popular ones include region-growing methods [31,32], level set methods [33–38], graph cut methods [39–44], active contours (snake) algorithms [45–49] and semiautomatic segmentations such as livewires [5…”
MethodQuantitative histogram analysis of images
Holub, O., & Ferreira, S. T. (2006) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2006.06.014 · Cited by 42 · cited 1×
“, mean, median, min, max, range, skewness, kurtosis), but also more complex values, such as metabolic volume above an absolute SUV of 5 or the fraction of highdensity tissue measured with CT [60,61].”
BackgroundInteractive segmentation based on the live wire for 3D CT chest image analysis
Lu, K., & Higgins, W. E. (2007) · International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11548-007-0129-x · Cited by 41 · cited 1×
“Many popular segmentation algorithms have been applied in medical imaging studies within the last 20 years; the most popular ones include region-growing methods [31,32], level set methods [33–38], graph cut methods [39–44], active contours (snake) algorithms [45–49] and semiautomatic segmentations such as livewires [5…”
MethodGraph cut with ordering constraints on labels and its applications
Liu, X., Veksler, O., & Samarabandu, J. K. (2008) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2008.4587470 · Cited by 37 · cited 1×
“Many popular segmentation algorithms have been applied in medical imaging studies within the last 20 years; the most popular ones include region-growing methods [31,32], level set methods [33–38], graph cut methods [39–44], active contours (snake) algorithms [45–49] and semiautomatic segmentations such as livewires [5…”
MethodYang, C., Stadler, W. M., Karczmar, G. S., Milosevic, M., Yeung, I. W. T., & Haider, M. A. (2010) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.22371 · Cited by 36 · cited 1×
“Different investigators use different methods to convert DCE MRI signal intensities to contrast agent concentration [23–25].”
MethodMakkat, S., Luypaert, R., Sourbron, S. P., Stadnik, T. W., & Mey, J. D. (2007) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.20937 · Cited by 35 · cited 1×
“Results of the DCE MRI depend on the contrast agent dose, method of administration, pulse sequence used, field strength of the scanner and the analysis method used [20–22].”
MethodAn open-source toolkit for the volumetric measurement of CT lung lesions
Krishnan, K., Ibanez, L., Turner, W. D., Jomier, J., & Avila, R. S. (2010) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.18.015256 · Cited by 34
CHEN, C., Li, H., Zhou, X., & Wong, S. T. C. (2008) · Journal of Microscopy · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2818.2008.01974.x · Cited by 33 · cited 1×
“Many popular segmentation algorithms have been applied in medical imaging studies within the last 20 years; the most popular ones include region-growing methods [31,32], level set methods [33–38], graph cut methods [39–44], active contours (snake) algorithms [45–49] and semiautomatic segmentations such as livewires [5…”
MethodMapping LIDC, RadLex™, and Lung Nodule Image Features
Opulencia, P., Channin, D. S., Raicu, D. S., & Furst, J. D. (2010) · Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10278-010-9285-6 · Cited by 30 · cited 1×
“There are efforts to develop a standardized lexicon for the description of such lesions [4,5] and to include these descriptors via annotated image markup into quantitative, mineable data [6,7].”
BackgroundSegmentation of elastographic images using a coarse-to-fine active contour model
Liu, W., Zagzebski, J. A., Varghese, T., Dyer, C. R., Techavipoo, U., & Hall, T. J. (2006) · Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.11.011 · Cited by 29 · cited 1×
“Many popular segmentation algorithms have been applied in medical imaging studies within the last 20 years; the most popular ones include region-growing methods [31,32], level set methods [33–38], graph cut methods [39–44], active contours (snake) algorithms [45–49] and semiautomatic segmentations such as livewires [5…”
MethodA Context‐Sensitive Active Contour for 2D Corpus Callosum Segmentation
He, Q., Duan, Y., Miles, J. H., & Takahashi, N. (2007) · International Journal of Biomedical Imaging · doi:10.1155/2007/24826 · Cited by 26 · cited 1×
“Many popular segmentation algorithms have been applied in medical imaging studies within the last 20 years; the most popular ones include region-growing methods [31,32], level set methods [33–38], graph cut methods [39–44], active contours (snake) algorithms [45–49] and semiautomatic segmentations such as livewires [5…”
MethodToward a fully de-identified biomedical information warehouse.
Liu, J., Erdal, S., Silvey, S. A., Ding, J., Riedel, J. D., Marsh, C. B., & Kamal, J. (2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 25
Canuto, H. C., McLachlan, C., Kettunen, M. I., Velić, M., Krishnan, A. S., Neves, A., de Backer, M., Hu, D., Hobson, M., & Brindle, K. M. (2009) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.21946 · Cited by 21
Janssen, M. H. M., Öllers, M., van Stiphout, R. G. P. M., Riedl, R. G., van den Bogaard, J., Buijsen, J., Lambin, P., & Lammering, G. (2010) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2010.01.021 · Cited by 18 · cited 1×
“From a patient protocol perspective, administration issues (residual activity in syringe, paravenous administration), blood glucose level [17], uptake period, breathing, patient comfort and inflammation all influence the quantitation of the standardized uptake value (SUV) of 18-FDG.”
BackgroundSelf-citationSegmentation of the central-chest lymph nodes in 3D MDCT images
Lu, K., & Higgins, W. E. (2011) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.06.014 · Cited by 17 · cited 1×
“Many popular segmentation algorithms have been applied in medical imaging studies within the last 20 years; the most popular ones include region-growing methods [31,32], level set methods [33–38], graph cut methods [39–44], active contours (snake) algorithms [45–49] and semiautomatic segmentations such as livewires [5…”
MethodRECIST: right time to renovate?
Burton, A. (2007) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(07)70155-9 · Cited by 16 · cited 1×
“These measures do not reflect the complexity of tumor morphology or behavior, nor, in many cases, are changes in these measures predictive of therapeutic benefit [3].”
BackgroundIterative live wire and live snake: new user-steered 3D image segmentation paradigms
Souza, A., Udupa, J. K., Grevera, G. J., Sun, Y., Odhner, D., Suri, N., & Schnall, M. D. (2006) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.651333 · Cited by 16 · cited 1×
“Many popular segmentation algorithms have been applied in medical imaging studies within the last 20 years; the most popular ones include region-growing methods [31,32], level set methods [33–38], graph cut methods [39–44], active contours (snake) algorithms [45–49] and semiautomatic segmentations such as livewires [5…”
MethodEvaluation of accuracy in MS lesion volumetry using realistic lesion phantoms
Rexilius, J., Hahn, H. K., Schlüter, M., Bourquain, H., & Peitgen, H. (2005) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2004.10.059 · Cited by 13 · cited 1×
“In the majority of cases, manual segmentation tends to overestimate the lesion volume to ensure the entire lesion is identified [54], and the process is highly variable [55,56].”
BackgroundReliefF-Based Feature Selection for Automatic Tumor Classification of Mammogram Images
Heshmati, A., Amjadifard, R., & Shanbehzadeh, J. (2011) · Iranian Conference on Machine Vision and Image Processing · doi:10.1109/iranianmvip.2011.6121616 · Cited by 8
Kramer, K., Goldgof, D. B., Hall, L., & Remsen, A. (2011) · IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM) · doi:10.1109/cidm.2011.5949457 · Cited by 8
Self-citationOptimum compactness structures derived from the regular octahedron
Suárez, J., Gancedo, E., Álvarez, J. M., & Morán, A. (2008) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.04.030 · Cited by 6 · cited 1×
“Second-order statistics or co-occurrence matrix features can be used for texture classification [64–66] and are widely applied in medical pattern recognition tasks [67–71].”
Method
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Jackson E, Ashton E, Evelhoch J, Buonocore M, Karczmar G, Rosen M, et al. Multivendor, multisite DCE-MRI phantom validation study. 2009. In: Proceedings of the 95th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA '10); December 2009; Chicago, IL, USA.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data
Gillies, R. J., Kinahan, P. E., & Hricak, H. (2016) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2015151169 · Cited by 8,421
Self-citationRadiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine
Lambin, P., Leijenaar, R. T. H., Deist, T. M., Peerlings, J., de Jong, E. E. C., van Timmeren, J., Sanduleanu, S., Larue, R. T. H. M., Even, A. J. G., Jochems, A., et al. (2017) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.141 · Cited by 5,688
Self-citationDecoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach
Aerts, H. J. W. L., Velazquez, E. R., Leijenaar, R. T. H., Parmar, C., Grossmann, P., Carvalho, S., Bussink, J., Monshouwer, R., Haibe-Kains, B., Rietveld, D., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5006 · Cited by 5,132
Self-citationZwanenburg, A., Vallières, M., Abdalah, M. A., Aerts, H. J. W. L., Andrearczyk, V., Apte, A., Ashrafinia, S., Bakas, S., Beukinga, R. J., Boellaard, R., et al. (2020) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2020191145 · Cited by 4,177
“5 iv Chapter 1 On this document While analysis of medical images has practically taken place since the first image was recorded, high throughput analysis of medical images is a more recent phenomenon (Kumar et al., 2012; Lambin et al., 2012; Gillies et al., 2015). The aim of such a radiomics process is to provide decis…”
BackgroundSelf-citationArtificial intelligence in radiology
Hosny, A., Parmar, C., Quackenbush, J., Schwartz, L. H., & Aerts, H. J. W. L. (2018) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-018-0016-5 · Cited by 3,803
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kumar, V., Gu, Y., Basu, S., Berglund, A., Eschrich, S. A., Schabath, M. B., Forster, K., Aerts, H. J. W. L., Dekker, A., Fenstermacher, D., Goldgof, D. B., Hall, L. O., Lambin, P., Balagurunathan, Y., Gatenby, R. A., & Gillies, R. J.
- Affiliations
- Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
- University of South Florida (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Gillies, Robert J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1234-1248
- ISSN
- 0730-725X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3563280
- OpenAlex
- W2097475056
- Cited by
- 2,258
- References
- 104
- Citations by year
- 2026: 106 · 2025: 189 · 2024: 224 · 2023: 236 · 2022: 277 · 2021: 290 · 2020: 253 · 2019: 209 · 2018: 190 · 2017: 127 · 2016: 86 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 16.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Radiological Society of North America
- National Cancer Institute (U01CA143062, P30CA076292)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- radiomics, quantitative imaging features, image segmentation, feature extraction, data sharing, non-small cell lung cancer, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, prediction model
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Lung Neoplasms, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Medical Informatics, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Risk Factors, Software, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Reproducibility of Results, Multivariate Analysis, Radiation Oncology, Phantoms, Imaging, Positron-Emission Tomography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review