The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
4D MR phase and magnitude segmentations with GPU parallel computing
Open accessAbstract
The increasing size and number of data sets of large four dimensional (three spatial, one temporal) magnetic resonance (MR) cardiac images necessitates efficient segmentation algorithms. Analysis of phase-contrast MR images yields cardiac flow information which can be manipulated to produce accurate segmentations of the aorta. Phase contrast segmentation algorithms are proposed that use simple mean-based calculations and least mean squared curve fitting techniques. The initial segmentations are generated on a multi-threaded central processing unit (CPU) in 10 seconds or less, though the computational simplicity of the algorithms results in a loss of accuracy. A more complex graphics processing unit (GPU)-based algorithm fits flow data to Gaussian waveforms, and produces an initial segmentation in 0.5 seconds. Level sets are then applied to a magnitude image, where the initial conditions are given by the previous CPU and GPU algorithms. A comparison of results shows that the GPU algorithm appears to produce the most accurate segmentation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Alvarado ve diğerleri [59] yaptıkları çalışmada bölütleme için OpenMP ve CUDA kullanmışlar ve 8 kata kadar hızlanma elde etmişlerdir.”
From GPU Programlamada CUDA Platformu Kullanılan Paralel Görüntü İşleme Çalışmalarının İncelenmesi (2020) · cites this paper as [59]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 11
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 1999, Lect Notes Comput Sci, 1682
Metadata
- Authors
- Bergen, R. V., Lin, H.-Y., Alexander, M. E., & Bidinosti, C. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Manitoba (CA)
- National Research Council Canada (CA)
- The University of Winnipeg (CA)
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 134-145
- ISSN
- 0730-725X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035416707
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- public-domain
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Mspace (University of Manitoba) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- NPARC (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Winnipeg
- University of Manitoba
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- 4D cardiac MRI, aorta segmentation, phase-contrast MRI, GPU parallel computing, level sets, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Aorta, Computer Graphics, Diagnostic Imaging, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Software, User-Computer Interface, Reproducibility of Results, Normal Distribution, Least-Squares Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 4D MR phase and magnitude segmentations with GPU parallel computing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.mri.2014.08.019
- The paper
- Bergen, R. V., Lin, H.-Y., Alexander, M. E., & Bidinosti, C. P. (2015). 4D MR phase and magnitude segmentations with GPU parallel computing. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2014.08.019