Cited by 11Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

4D MR phase and magnitude segmentations with GPU parallel computing

Open access

Abstract

The increasing size and number of data sets of large four dimensional (three spatial, one temporal) magnetic resonance (MR) cardiac images necessitates efficient segmentation algorithms. Analysis of phase-contrast MR images yields cardiac flow information which can be manipulated to produce accurate segmentations of the aorta. Phase contrast segmentation algorithms are proposed that use simple mean-based calculations and least mean squared curve fitting techniques. The initial segmentations are generated on a multi-threaded central processing unit (CPU) in 10 seconds or less, though the computational simplicity of the algorithms results in a loss of accuracy. A more complex graphics processing unit (GPU)-based algorithm fits flow data to Gaussian waveforms, and produces an initial segmentation in 0.5 seconds. Level sets are then applied to a magnitude image, where the initial conditions are given by the previous CPU and GPU algorithms. A comparison of results shows that the GPU algorithm appears to produce the most accurate segmentation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mri.2014.08.019

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 11

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 1999, Lect Notes Comput Sci, 1682

Metadata

Authors
Bergen, R. V., Lin, H.-Y., Alexander, M. E., & Bidinosti, C. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • National Research Council Canada (CA)
  • The University of Winnipeg (CA)
Venue
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
134-145
ISSN
0730-725X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035416707
Cited by
11
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Mspace (University of Manitoba) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • NPARC (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Winnipeg
  • University of Manitoba
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Keywords
4D cardiac MRI, aorta segmentation, phase-contrast MRI, GPU parallel computing, level sets, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Aorta, Computer Graphics, Diagnostic Imaging, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Software, User-Computer Interface, Reproducibility of Results, Normal Distribution, Least-Squares Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 4D MR phase and magnitude segmentations with GPU parallel computing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.mri.2014.08.019
The paper
Bergen, R. V., Lin, H.-Y., Alexander, M. E., & Bidinosti, C. P. (2015). 4D MR phase and magnitude segmentations with GPU parallel computing. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2014.08.019