Cited by 64Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Shape and diffusion tensor imaging based integrative analysis of the hippocampus and the amygdala in Alzheimer's disease

Open access
Tang, Xiaoying, Qin, Yuanyuan, Wu, Jiong, Zhang, Min, Zhu, Wenzhen, Miller, Michael I.·2016·Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract

We analyzed, in an integrative fashion, the morphometry and structural integrity of the bilateral hippocampi and amygdalas in Alzheimer's disease (AD) using T1-weighted images and diffusion tensor images (DTIs). We detected significant hippocampal and amygdalar volumetric atrophies in AD relative to healthy controls (HCs). Shape analysis revealed significant region-specific atrophies with the hippocampal atrophy mainly being concentrated on the CA1 and CA2 while the amygdalar atrophy was concentrated on the basolateral and basomedial. In all structures, the structural integrity displayed a significantly decreased mean fractional anisotropy (FA) value and an increased mean trace value in AD. In addition to the inter-group comparisons, we systematically evaluated the discriminative power of our three types of features (volume, shape, and DTI), both individually and in their possible combinations, when differentiating between AD and HCs. We found the volume features to be redundant when the more sophisticated shape features were available. A combination of the shape and DTI features of the right hippocampus, with classification automatically performed by support vector machine, yielded the strongest classification result (overall accuracy, 94.6%; sensitivity, 95.5%; specificity, 93.3%).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mri.2016.05.001

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In AD, amyloid deposition spreads and the disease pathogenesis progressively involves a broad region of the brain.

    “the amyloid deposition spreads, and the disease pathogenesis progressively involves a broad region of the brain”

    From AAVrh.10-Mediated APOE2 Central Nervous System Gene Therapy for APOE4-Associated Alzheimer's Disease (2018) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Introduction describes AD as a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, and the Results report abnormalities in the hippocampus and amygdala. But the paper’s passages do not say that amyloid deposition spreads or that pathology progressively extends across a broad region of the brain; the findings concern specific structures rather than brain-wide progression. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 73 · Cited by 64

Authors
Tang, X., Qin, Y., Wu, J., Zhang, M., Zhu, W., & Miller, M. I.
Affiliations
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • Tongji Hospital (CN)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Tang, Xiaoying
Venue
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
34
Issue
8
Pages
1087-1099
ISSN
0730-725X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2398671403
Cited by
64
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
FWCI
4.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81501546, 84101389, 81171308)
  • SYSU-CMU Shunde International Joint Research Institute (20150306)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, hippocampus, amygdala, hippocampal atrophy, hippocampal subfields, CA1, CA2, basolateral amygdala, basomedial amygdala, fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, brain morphometry, shape analysis, diffusion tensor imaging, support vector machine classification, disease diagnosis
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Amygdala, Atrophy, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Diffusion Tensor Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review