A review on brain tumor diagnosis from MRI images: Practical implications, key achievements, and lessons learned
Abstract
The successful early diagnosis of brain tumors plays a major role in improving the treatment outcomes and thus improving patient survival. Manually evaluating the numerous magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images produced routinely in the clinic is a difficult process. Thus, there is a crucial need for computer-aided methods with better accuracy for early tumor diagnosis. Computer-aided brain tumor diagnosis from MRI images consists of tumor detection, segmentation, and classification processes. Over the past few years, many studies have focused on traditional or classical machine learning techniques for brain tumor diagnosis. Recently, interest has developed in using deep learning techniques for diagnosing brain tumors with better accuracy and robustness. This study presents a comprehensive review of traditional machine learning techniques and evolving deep learning techniques for brain tumor diagnosis. This review paper identifies the key achievements reflected in the performance measurement metrics of the applied algorithms in the three diagnosis processes. In addition, this study discusses the key findings and draws attention to the lessons learned as a roadmap for future research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Abd-Ellah et al. performed a systematic literature review on brain tumor detection, segmentation, and classification using machine and deep learning, but did not provide an overview of recent deep learning methods and the BraTS 2018 dataset.
“Another systematic literature review was performed by Abd-Ellah et al. [14] on brain tumor detection, segmentation, and classification using machine and deep learning, but they did not provide an overview of recent deep learning methods and the BraTS 2018 dataset.”
From A Comprehensive Analysis of Recent Deep and Federated-Learning-Based Methodologies for Brain Tumor Diagnosis (2022) · cites this paper as [14]
Few studies have reviewed deep and federated learning, and these studies have limitations.
“Few studies have reviewed deep and federated learning. Moreover, these studies have limitations.”
From A Comprehensive Analysis of Recent Deep and Federated-Learning-Based Methodologies for Brain Tumor Diagnosis (2022) · cites this paper as [14]
Primary tumors are categorized as benign or malignant depending on their type, and they can be life-threatening because when they grow, they cause damage to brain cells and skulls.
“These tumors are categorized as benign or malignant, depending on their type, and they can be life-threatening because when they grow, they cause damage to brain cells and skulls [14].”
From A Comprehensive Analysis of Recent Deep and Federated-Learning-Based Methodologies for Brain Tumor Diagnosis (2022) · cites this paper as [14]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 163 · Cited by 348
- Authors
- Abd-Ellah, M. K., Awad, A. I., Khalaf, A. A. M., & Hamed, H. F. A.
- Affiliations
- Al-Azhar University (EG)
- Minia University (EG)
- Corresponding author
- Awad, Ali Ismail
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 61
- Pages
- 300-318
- ISSN
- 0730-725X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2948542848
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 163
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 2.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Keywords
- brain tumor diagnosis, computer-aided diagnosis, tumor segmentation, tumor classification, tumor detection, deep learning, machine learning, early diagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Algorithms, Brain, Brain Neoplasms, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Glioma, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review