Cited by 10Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Central vein sign in patients with inflammatory lesion of the upper cervical spinal cord on susceptibility weighted imaging at 3 tesla. Preliminary results

Jensen-Kondering, U., Larsen, N., Huhndorf, M., Jansen, O., Lüddecke, R., Stürner, K., Salehi Ravesh, M.·2022·Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract

Background The central vein sign (CVS) has been described in vivo in patients with MS but also in other inflammatory lesion of the brain such as neuromyelits optica spectrum disease and others. Recently, it has been used to differentiate patients with MS from other inflammatory lesions of the brain. Objective It was the goal of this study to demonstrate the feasibility of the depiction of the CVS in patients with inflammatory lesion of the upper cervical spinal cord using susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI). Methods Consecutive patients with inflammatory lesions of the upper cervical spinal cord were included. Patients were scanned using a 3 T Philips Ingenia CX. The presence of the CVS was assessed by two raters. Demographic and clinical parameters were compared between patients with and those without a CVS. Results 20 patients could be included. 15 patients had a diagnosis of MS. A CVS was present in 8 patients (40%). Agreement between the two raters was substantial (κ = 0.79). Time from first manifestation was significantly different (14 vs. 2 years, p = 0.021) between patients with CVS and without CVS. Conclusion The depiction of the CVS in the upper cervical spine is feasible. More research is necessary to evaluate these preliminary results and the value of the CVS in the spinal cord.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mri.2022.07.013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jensen-Kondering, U., Larsen, N., Huhndorf, M., Jansen, O., Lüddecke, R., Stürner, K., & Salehi Ravesh, M.
Affiliations
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE)
Venue
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-11
Volume
93
Pages
11-14
ISSN
0730-725X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4288760582
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
central vein sign, susceptibility-weighted imaging, upper cervical spinal cord, multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, 3T MRI, interobserver agreement
MeSH terms
Brain, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Multiple Sclerosis, Spinal Cord, Cervical Cord

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review