Cited by 205DNA Repair MechanismsRedox biology and oxidative stressCarcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment

DNA damage by singlet oxygen and cellular protective mechanisms

Agnez-Lima, Lucymara F., Melo, Julliane T.A., Silva, Acarízia E., Oliveira, Ana Helena S., Timoteo, Ana Rafaela S., Lima-Bessa, Keronninn M., Martinez, Glaucia R., Medeiros, Marisa H.G. +3 more·2012·Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research

Abstract

Reactive oxygen species, as singlet oxygen ((1)O(2)) and hydrogen peroxide, are continuously generated by aerobic organisms, and react actively with biomolecules. At excessive amounts, (1)O(2) induces oxidative stress and shows carcinogenic and toxic effects due to oxidation of lipids, proteins and nucleic acids. Singlet oxygen is able to react with DNA molecule and may induce G to T transversions due to 8-oxodG generation. The nucleotide excision repair, base excision repair and mismatch repair have been implicated in the correction of DNA lesions induced by (1)O(2) both in prokaryotic and in eukaryotic cells. (1)O(2) is also able to induce the expression of genes involved with the cellular responses to oxidative stress, such as NF-κB, c-fos and c-jun, and genes involved with tissue damage and inflammation, as ICAM-1, interleukins 1 and 6. The studies outlined in this review reinforce the idea that (1)O(2) is one of the more dangerous reactive oxygen species to the cells, and deserves our attention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mrrev.2011.12.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 205 · Cited by 205

Authors
Agnez-Lima, L. F., Melo, J. T. A., Silva, A. E., Oliveira, A. H. S., Timoteo, A. R. S., Lima-Bessa, K. M., Martinez, G. R., Medeiros, M. H. G., Di Mascio, P., Galhardo, R. S., & Menck, C. F. M.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (BR)
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Venue
Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
751
Issue
1
Pages
15-28
ISSN
1383-5742 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011985542
Cited by
205
References
205
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • CAPES
  • INCT-Redox Processes in Biomedicine, Redoxoma-CNPq
  • FAPESP
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Keywords
singlet oxygen, DNA damage, reactive oxygen species, oxidative stress, 8-oxoguanine, G to T transversions, nucleotide excision repair, base excision repair, DNA mismatch repair, NF-κB, c-fos, c-Jun, ICAM-1, interleukin-1, interleukin-6, inflammation, carcinogenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review