Alternative diagnoses in patients referred to specialized centers for suspected MS
Abstract
Objectives The aim of this study is to explore the frequency, type, and predictors of alternative diagnoses among patients referred with a recent diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) to two specialized MS centers in the Middle East. Methods This is a retrospective review of a prospectively followed cohort of MS patients at 2 University specialized MS centers. All patients referred for MS were included. The final diagnosis was recorded and demographic, clinical, laboratory, electrophysiological and radiological variables were collected. Results A total of 554 patients were included in this study of which 431 were referred for diagnostic confirmation. The final diagnosis of MS was confirmed in 300 (70%), while 114 (26%) turned out to have an alternative diagnosis and 15 (3.5%) fulfilled criteria for radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS). The most common alternative diagnoses were psychogenic (16.3%), non-specific MRI white matter lesions (14.7%), NMO (9.5%), migraine (8.6%) and systemic autoimmune disorders (8.6%). The strongest predictors of a final diagnosis of MS were: younger age, presence of oligoclonal bands in the CSF, periventricular, corpus callosum, spinal (P Conclusions Our study shows that 30% of patients referred for a suspicion of MS end up with a different diagnosis. The most common alternative diagnoses of MS in the Middle East are not different from what has been described in Western countries. Age, MRI and CSF findings can help with the differential diagnosis…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Lebanon and Kuwait between 2011 and 2015, the most common alternative diagnosis in 131 patients referred with clinical or radiological suspicion of MS to two tertiary MS centers for diagnostic confirmation of MS, who did not have a confirmed diagnosis of MS, was 'psychogenic' in 19 (16%).
“In Lebanon and Kuwait between 2011 and 2015, the most common alternative diagnosis in 131 patients referred with clinical or radiological suspicion of MS to two tertiary MS centers for diagnostic confirmation of MS, who did not have a confirmed diagnosis of MS, was “psychogenic” in 19 (16%) [26].”
From Functional neurological disorder and multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of misdiagnosis and clinical overlap (2022) · cites this paper as [26]
Cites
The contemporary spectrum of multiple sclerosis misdiagnosis
Solomon, A. J., Bourdette, D. N., Cross, A. H., Applebee, A., Skidd, P. M., Howard, D. B., Spain, R. I., Cameron, M. H., Kim, E., Mass, M. K., et al. (2016) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000003152 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Incidence of multiple sclerosis misdiagnosis in referrals to two academic centers
Kaisey, M., Solomon, A. J., Luu, M., Giesser, B. S., & Sicotte, N. L. (2019) · Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.msard.2019.01.048 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Walzl, D., Solomon, A. J., & Stone, J. (2022) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/s00415-021-10436-6 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Misdiagnosis of multiple sclerosis: Time for action
Brownlee, W. J., & Solomon, A. J. (2021) · Multiple Sclerosis Journal · doi:10.1177/13524585211005367 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Toljan, K., Amin, M., & Ontaneda, D. (2025) · Clinical Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.crad.2025.106984 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Genetic diseases misdiagnosed as multiple sclerosis: Observational study and review of literature
Mandia, D., Shor, N., Carlson, A. K., Obusez, E., Cohen, J. A., Fenu, S., Salsano, E., La Piana, R., Durães, J., Faustino, P., et al. (2025) · Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.msard.2025.106439 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Aldraihem, M., Alyami, W., AlQahtani, E., Saeed, L., AlDosary, R., Altowaijri, G., & Almutlaq, A. (2025) · Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.msard.2025.106779
- Authors
- Yamout, B. I., Khoury, S. J., Ayyoubi, N., Doumiati, H., Fakhreddine, M., Ahmed, S. F., Tamim, H., Al-Hashel, J. Y., Behbehani, R., & Alroughani, R.
- Affiliations
- American University of Beirut Medical Center (LB)
- Ibn Sina Hospital (KW)
- Amiri Hospital (KW)
- Corresponding author
- Yamout, B.I.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 18
- Pages
- 85-89
- ISSN
- 2211-0348 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2760170066
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
- Keywords
- multiple sclerosis, alternative diagnoses, differential diagnosis, diagnostic confirmation, radiologically isolated syndrome, neuromyelitis optica, psychogenic symptoms, migraine, oligoclonal bands, periventricular lesions, diagnostic predictors, Middle East
- MeSH terms
- Academic Medical Centers, Adult, Age Factors, Diagnosis, Differential, Diagnostic Errors, Female, Humans, Kuwait, Lebanon, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Multiple Sclerosis, Prospective Studies, Referral and Consultation, Retrospective Studies, Biomarkers, Multivariate Analysis, Neuroimaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review